Literature DB >> 19770321

BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement.

Robert L Gutierrez1, Wendy B DeMartini, Peter R Eby, Brenda F Kurland, Sue Peacock, Constance D Lehman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the predictive features of BI-RADS lesion characteristics and the risk of malignancy for mammographically and clinically occult lesions detected initially on breast MRI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 1,523 consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 1, 2003, to June 30, 2005, to identify all lesions initially detected on MRI and assessed as BI-RADS 4 or 5 for which the patient underwent subsequent imaging-guided needle or excisional biopsy. BI-RADS lesion features were recorded for each case, and the risk of malignancy was assessed using generalized estimating equations. Separate multivariate models were constructed for lesions classified as masses.
RESULTS: Included in the analysis were 258 suspicious lesions in 196 women. Among all lesions, those of 1 cm or greater were significantly more often malignant (50/147, 34%) than lesions of less than 1 cm (22/111, 20%; odds ratio, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.83). For masses, size, BI-RADS margin, and enhancement pattern predicted malignancy. In multivariate analysis of combinations of features, masses of 1 cm or greater with heterogeneous enhancement and irregular margins had a 68% probability of malignancy. Masses of 1 cm or greater with smooth margins and homogeneous enhancement had the lowest predicted probability of malignancy of 3%. BI-RADS descriptors and size were not significant predictors of malignancy for nonmasslike enhancement (NMLE).
CONCLUSION: Combinations of BI-RADS lesion descriptors can predict the probability of malignancy for breast MRI masses but not for NMLE. If our model is validated, masses with a low probability of malignancy may be eligible for short-interval follow-up rather than biopsy. Further research focused on predictive features of NMLE is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770321     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.1983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  42 in total

Review 1.  Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI.

Authors:  I Millet; E Pages; D Hoa; S Merigeaud; F Curros Doyon; X Prat; P Taourel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Kinetic analysis of lesions without mass effect on breast MRI using manual and computer-assisted methods.

Authors:  Tibor Vag; Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Ramy Zoubi; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Rim-enhancing breast masses with smooth or spiculated margins on magnetic resonance imaging: histopathology and clinical significance.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Masako Kasami; Brandi T Nicholson
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience?

Authors:  Maria Adele Marino; Paola Clauser; Ramona Woitek; Georg J Wengert; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Thomas H Helbich; Klaus Preidler; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-based biomarkers of therapeutic response in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel I Golden; Jafi A Lipson; Melinda L Telli; James M Ford; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Clinical application of bilateral high temporal and spatial resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast at 7 T.

Authors:  K Pinker; W Bogner; P Baltzer; S Trattnig; S Gruber; O Abeyakoon; M Bernathova; O Zaric; P Dubsky; Z Bago-Horvath; M Weber; D Leithner; T H Helbich
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Lesion morphology on breast MRI affects targeted ultrasound correlation rate.

Authors:  Lauren Hollowell; Elissa Price; Vignesh Arasu; Dorota Wisner; Nola Hylton; Bonnie Joe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A simple and robust classification tree for differentiation between benign and malignant lesions in MR-mammography.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Matthias Dietzel; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  The MRI characteristics of non-mass enhancement lesions of the breast: associations with malignancy.

Authors:  Hale Aydin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Breast MRI BI-RADS assessments and abnormal interpretation rates by clinical indication in US community practices.

Authors:  Christoph I Lee; Laura Ichikawa; Michele C Rochelle; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Brian L Sprague; Wendy B DeMartini; Karen J Wernli; Bonnie N Joe; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.