Literature DB >> 19770053

Finding meaning in novel geometric shapes influences electrophysiological correlates of repetition and dissociates perceptual and conceptual priming.

Joel L Voss1, Haline E Schendan, Ken A Paller.   

Abstract

Repeatedly viewing an object can engender fluency-related implicit memory for perceptual and conceptual attributes, as indexed in tests of perceptual and conceptual priming, respectively. Stimuli with minimal pre-experimental meaning allow direct comparisons between these two types of priming and explorations of whether corresponding neural mechanisms differ. We therefore examined electrophysiological correlates of perceptual and conceptual priming for minimalist geometric shapes (squiggles). Response time measures of conceptual priming were evident for squiggles rated by individual subjects as most meaningful, but not for those rated least meaningful. Conceptual-priming magnitude was proportional across individuals to the amplitude of FN400 brain potentials, but only for meaningful squiggles. Perceptual priming was evident for squiggles irrespective of meaningfulness, and perceptual-priming magnitude was proportional to the amplitude of frontal P170 potentials. These findings therefore show that a single exposure to a novel stimulus can lead to neural processing accompanying conceptual priming that is distinct from that accompanying perceptual priming (FN400 potentials vs. P170 potentials, respectively). Overall, this evidence is also relevant to the current debate over the neural correlates of familiarity-based recognition, and runs counter to the prominent supposition that familiarity can be generically indexed by FN400 potentials. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19770053     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  41 in total

1.  The potato chip really does look like Elvis! Neural hallmarks of conceptual processing associated with finding novel shapes subjectively meaningful.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Kara D Federmeier; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  More than a feeling: Pervasive influences of memory without awareness of retrieval.

Authors:  Joel L Voss; Heather D Lucas; Ken A Paller
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.065

3.  Attention's Accelerator.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Laura J McClenahan; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2016-04-07

4.  Experts' memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition.

Authors:  Grit Herzmann; Tim Curran
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

5.  Enhancing long-term memory with stimulation tunes visual attention in one trial.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  When 2 × 4 is meaningful: the N400 and P300 reveal operand format effects in multiplication verification.

Authors:  Danielle S Dickson; Vanessa R Cerda; Rosemary N Beavers; Andres Ruiz; Ricardo Castañeda; Nicole Y Y Wicha
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  High stakes trigger the use of multiple memories to enhance the control of attention.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Localization and Elimination of Attentional Dysfunction in Schizophrenia During Visual Search.

Authors:  Robert M G Reinhart; Sohee Park; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  An ERP study of recognition memory for concrete and abstract pictures in school-aged children.

Authors:  Olivier Boucher; Christine Chouinard-Leclaire; Gina Muckle; Alissa Westerlund; Matthew J Burden; Sandra W Jacobson; Joseph L Jacobson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.