Literature DB >> 14513456

Shoulder arthroplasty in the young patient.

Paul L Burroughs1, Peter F Gearen, William R Petty, Thomas W Wright.   

Abstract

We reviewed the performance of 22 shoulder implant arthroplasties in 19 patients age 50 or younger at surgery. Patients were evaluated by telephone interview, written questionnaire, and radiographic examination. The average age at surgery was 38.6 years, and the average follow-up was 5.6 years. Patients were grouped by disease process (rheumatoid arthritis [RA], avascular necrosis [AVN], trauma, and hemophilic arthropathy [HA]) and type of prosthesis (total vs. hemiarthroplasty). The highest scores (best shoulder function) were seen in patients with hemiarthroplasty for HA. Patients with hemiarthroplasty for trauma and AVN scored similarly, whereas those with a hemiarthroplasty for RA scored lowest. Patients with RA who had a total shoulder arthroplasty scored higher than patients with hemiarthroplasty. When patients in our population with longer follow-up were compared with those with a shorter follow-up, no downward trends in shoulder function were seen. Accelerated deterioration of function of shoulder arthroplasties was not observed in our young patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513456     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00253-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Results for endoprosthetic care in patients younger than 50 years].

Authors:  J Ziegler; M Amlang; M Bottesi; S Kirschner; W-C Witzleb; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Complications in shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 485 cases.

Authors:  Peter R Aldinger; Patric Raiss; Markus Rickert; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Soft tissue balancing in total shoulder replacement.

Authors:  Maike Mueller; Gregory Hoy
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

Review 4.  [Indications and alternatives for arthroplasty in young patients].

Authors:  S Eichinger; R Forst; M Kindervater
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  [The importance of wear couples for younger endoprosthesis patients].

Authors:  J Kircher; P Bergschmidt; R Bader; D Kluess; E Besser-Mahuzir; A Leder; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ahmed Haleem; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Nolan S Horner; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan; Bashar Alolabi
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-09-17

Review 7.  Shoulder Arthroplasty Options for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis in Young and Active Patients (<60 Years Old): A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hélder Fonte; Tiago Amorim-Barbosa; Sara Diniz; Luís Barros; Joaquim Ramos; Rui Claro
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  In vitro measurement of temperature changes during implantation of cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Guido Pape; Sebastian Jäger; Markus Loew; Rudi Bitsch; Markus Rickert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  [Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty in patients less than 55 years of age].

Authors:  P Raiss; G Pape; S Becker; M Rickert; M Loew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Early revision in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a cross-registry comparison.

Authors:  Mark T Dillon; Richard S Page; Stephen E Graves; Michelle F Lorimer; Heather A Prentice; Jessica E Harris; Elizabeth W Paxton; Ronald A Navarro
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-04-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.