Literature DB >> 19763726

High union rates and function scores at midterm followup with ankle arthrodesis using a four screw technique.

Hans Zwipp1, Stefan Rammelt, Thomas Endres, Jan Heineck.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: When evaluating the role of ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of severe ankle arthritis, postoperative infection, nonunion, and the development of arthritis at the adjacent joints are major issues when considering treatment alternatives. We evaluated the rate of complications, the functional outcome, and compensatory range of motion at the midtarsal joint at medium-term followup after ankle arthrodesis with four cancellous screws. We performed 94 ankle fusions in 92 patients; 12 patients were lost to followup and eight declined to participate, leaving 72 patients (76%) for evaluation. The minimum followup was 4.8 years (mean, 5.9; range, 4.8-7.8 years). No patient developed a deep infection; three patients developed postoperative hematoma which we operatively drained. Union occurred in 93 of the 94 patients (99%). The sagittal motion at the midtarsal joint averaged 24 degrees . Secondary arthritis of the subtalar and talonavicular joints developed during the followup period in 17% and 11%, respectively. Progression of preexisting arthritis occurred in 13 of 43 patients (30%) at the subtalar joint and five of 26 patients (19%) at the talonavicular joint. None of these patients had fusion of an adjacent joint. The average American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score increased from 36 preoperatively to 85 at followup. Ankle arthrodesis with screws provides high rates of union, reliable pain relief, and favorable functional medium-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19763726      PMCID: PMC2835613          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1074-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

Review 1.  [Arthrodesis - non-union of the ankle. Arthrodesis failed].

Authors:  H Zwipp; R Grass; S Rammelt; C Dahlen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Posterior roentgenogram of the foot.

Authors:  J C Cobey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Arthrodesis of the ankle.

Authors:  E W Johnson; E H Boseker
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1968-11

4.  Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis.

Authors:  L M Coester; C L Saltzman; J Leupold; W Pontarelli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Quality of life 20 years after arthrodesis of the ankle. A study of adjacent joints.

Authors:  S Fuchs; C Sandmann; A Skwara; C Chylarecki
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

6.  Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis.

Authors:  J M Mazur; E Schwartz; S R Simon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Ankle fusion attributable to posttraumatic arthrosis: a long-term followup of 48 patients.

Authors:  Matthias Buchner; Desiderius Sabo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Foot function after subtalar distraction bone-block arthrodesis. A prospective study.

Authors:  S Rammelt; R Grass; T Zawadski; A Biewener; H Zwipp
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

9.  Clinical outcome of tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing the chevron technique.

Authors:  Franz J Kopp; Michael A Banks; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Complications and long-term results of ankle arthrodeses following trauma.

Authors:  B F Morrey; G P Wiedeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  [Arthrodesis and endoprostheses of the ankle joint: indications, techniques and pitfalls].

Authors:  S H Wirth; G Klammer; N Espinosa
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Ankle fusion using a 2-incision, 3-screw technique.

Authors:  R P M Hendrickx; G M M J Kerkhoffs; S A S Stufkens; C N van Dijk; R K Marti
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Optimal double screw configuration for subtalar arthrodesis: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jun Young Lee; Yeon Soo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Arthrodesis for patients with rheumatic arthritis of the ankle and hindfoot. A reasonable option?].

Authors:  C Baier; H R Springorum; G Maderbacher; C Pickl; J Grifka; J Götz
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Can a Three-Component Prosthesis be Used for Conversion of Painful Ankle Arthrodesis to Total Ankle Replacement?

Authors:  Markus Preis; Travis Bailey; Lucas S Marchand; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Three-dimensional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanar radiographs: comparison with standard radiographic measurements.

Authors:  Reto Sutter; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Norman Espinosa; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint using angle-stable mini-plates: a prospective study.

Authors:  Philipp Lechler; Stephanie Graf; Franz Xaver Köck; Jens Schaumburger; Joachim Grifka; Martin Handel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Anterior ankle arthrodesis with molded plate: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Mohammad Gharehdaghi; Hasan Rahimi; Alireza Mousavian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

9.  [Arthrodesis versus total joint replacement of the ankle].

Authors:  T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Thromboembolic complications following ankle prosthesis implantation].

Authors:  A Barg; S W Schneider; G Pagenstert; B Hintermann; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.