Literature DB >> 15132930

Clinical outcome of tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing the chevron technique.

Franz J Kopp1, Michael A Banks, Randall E Marcus.   

Abstract

Tibiotalar arthrodesis remains the gold standard reconstructive procedure for the treatment of disabling ankle arthritis. The purpose of this study was to review the clinical results of tibiotalar arthrodesis utilizing the chevron fusion technique. The results of 46 consecutive patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis utilizing the chevron technique were reviewed. The etiology of the tibiotalar arthritis was posttraumatic in 29 of 46 patients. Of the remaining 17 patients, seven had osteoarthritis, five had talar osteonecrosis, two had rheumatoid arthritis, one had hemophilic arthropathy, one had gouty arthropathy, and one had unrecognized chronic osteomyelitis. Three patients had prior hindfoot arthrodeses, and two patients had bilateral ankle fusions at last follow-up. All patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Of the 46 patients, 41 were available for review, with an average follow-up of 7.3 years (range, 2-20 years). Twelve patients had greater than 10-year follow-up. The Mazur ankle score was calculated for all 41 patients. The average Mazur ankle score for the 41 patients available for review was 72.8, out of a maximum possible score of 90. Eighteen patients had excellent results, 11 patients had good results, five patients had fair results, and seven patients had poor results. The most common reasons for fair or poor results were symptomatic subtalar arthritis and multiple medical comorbidities. All patients with postoperative symptomatic subtalar arthritis had preoperative radiographic evidence of subtalar arthrosis. Of the 12 patients with greater than 10-year follow-up, nine had excellent or good results, and an average Mazur ankle score of 76.6. All patients with either prior hindfoot arthrodeses or bilateral ankle fusions had excellent or good results. Of the 41 arthrodeses included in the study, 38 (38/41, 93%) went on to clinical and radiographic union. The chevron technique provides a predictable method to obtain fusion of the tibiotalar joint. Most patients can expect excellent or good results. In the current study, 90% (37/41) of patients were satisfied with the outcome of their surgery and would undergo the same operation again under similar circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15132930     DOI: 10.1177/107110070402500406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  8 in total

1.  Comparison study of two surgical options for distal tibia fracture-minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis vs. open reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  Wang Cheng; Ying Li; Wang Manyi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Patient and Surgical Factors Affecting Fusion Rates After Arthroscopic and Open Ankle Fusion: A Review of a High-Risk Cohort.

Authors:  Ashish B Shah; William Davis; Zachary L Littlefield; Sean Young; Bradley Alexander; Nicholas A Andrews; Ankit Khurana; Benjamin Cage; Tanvee Sinha; Gerald McGwin; Ashish Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Treatment of distal tibial shaft fractures by three different surgical methods: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Yongchuan Li; Xi Jiang; Qinghe Guo; Lei Zhu; Tianwen Ye; Aimin Chen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  High union rates and function scores at midterm followup with ankle arthrodesis using a four screw technique.

Authors:  Hans Zwipp; Stefan Rammelt; Thomas Endres; Jan Heineck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical and Radiological Mid- to Long-term Outcomes Following Ankle Fusion.

Authors:  Ines E Gaedke; Ulrich Wiebking; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; Christian Krettek; Ralph Gaulke
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Ankle arthrodesis: A systematic approach and review of the literature.

Authors:  Youichi Yasui; Charles P Hannon; Dexter Seow; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-11-18

7.  TIBIOTARSAL COMPRESSION ARTHRODESIS USING A LATERAL LOCKING PLATE.

Authors:  Michael J Coughlin; Caio Nery; Daniel Baumfeld; James Jastifer
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04

8.  Novel anterior curved incision combined with MIPO for Pilon fracture treatment.

Authors:  Dankai Wu; Chuangang Peng; Guangkai Ren; Baoming Yuan; He Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.