Literature DB >> 23979169

[Arthrodesis and endoprostheses of the ankle joint: indications, techniques and pitfalls].

S H Wirth1, G Klammer, N Espinosa.   

Abstract

If adequate conservative measures for the treatment of end-stage ankle osteoarthritis have failed, surgery may be taken into consideration. After exorbitant failure rates in the beginning of total ankle replacement, nowadays this kind of treatment has regained lot of interest and has become a viable alternative to ankle fusion. The correct indication and a precise explanation of the surgical procedure, outcomes and potential complications provide a solid base for future success.Currently, there is no doubt that total ankle replacement has become an important player in the treatment of symptomatic and debilitating end-stage ankle arthritis. With increasing number of patients who undergo total ankle replacement the experience with this kind of procedure increases too. As a consequence several surgeons have started to stretch indications favoring total ankle replacement. However, it must be mentioned here, despite progress in terms of improved anatomical and biomechanical understanding of the hindfoot and improved surgical techniques and instruments, total ankle replacement and ankle fusion remain challenging and difficult procedures. We provide a review article including an overview of the relevant techniques. This article should serve as rough guide for surgeons and help in decision-making regarding total ankle replacement and ankle fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23979169     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-013-2386-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  67 in total

1.  Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement.

Authors:  Fabian G Krause; Markus Windolf; Biraj Bora; Murray J Penner; Kevin J Wing; Alastair S E Younger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Michael S Lee; David M Millward
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.231

3.  Habitual physical activity and sports participation after total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian D Naal; Franco M Impellizzeri; Markus Loibl; Martin Huber; Pascal F Rippstein
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  STAR™ ankle: long-term results.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Mann; Roger A Mann; Eric Horton
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 5.  Total ankle arthroplasty: state of the art.

Authors:  C L Saltzman
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

6.  Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.

Authors:  Roel P M Hendrickx; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Evelien E de Bruijn; Inger N Sierevelt; C Niek van Dijk; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR).

Authors:  Hakon Kofoed
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: a comparative gait analysis study.

Authors:  Philippe Piriou; Paul Culpan; Mark Mullins; Jean-Noel Cardon; Delphine Pozzi; Thierry Judet
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adrienne A Spirt; Mathieu Assal; Sigvard T Hansen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Ankle arthrodesis: results after the miniarthrotomy technique.

Authors:  G D Paremain; S D Miller; M S Myerson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.