Literature DB >> 19761342

Visual motion aftereffects arise from a cascade of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms.

Alan A Stocker1, Eero P Simoncelli.   

Abstract

Prolonged exposure to a moving stimulus can substantially alter the perceived velocity (both speed and direction) of subsequently presented stimuli. Here, we show that these changes can be parsimoniously explained with a model that combines the effects of two isomorphic adaptation mechanisms, one nondirectional and one directional. Each produces a pattern of velocity biases that serves as an observable "signature" of the corresponding mechanism. The net effect on perceived velocity is a superposition of these two signatures. By examining human velocity judgments in the context of different adaptor velocities, we are able to separate these two signatures. The model fits the data well, successfully predicts subjects' behavior in an additional experiment using a nondirectional adaptor, and is in agreement with a variety of previous experimental results. As such, the model provides a unifying explanation for the diversity of motion aftereffects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19761342      PMCID: PMC3718883          DOI: 10.1167/9.9.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  43 in total

1.  A model of speed tuning in MT neurons.

Authors:  John A Perrone; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  A Bayesian framework for sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Norberto M Grzywacz; Rosario M Balboa
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Subtractive and divisive adaptation in visual motion computations.

Authors:  Keith Langley; Stephen J Anderson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The relation between color discrimination and color constancy: when is optimal adaptation task dependent?

Authors:  Alicia B Abrams; James M Hillis; David H Brainard
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion.

Authors:  E Levinson; R Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Direction-selective coding of stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion.

Authors:  R E Phinney; C Bowd; R Patterson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  A ratio model of perceived speed in the human visual system.

Authors:  Stephen T Hammett; Rebecca A Champion; Antony B Morland; Peter G Thompson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Peter Dayan; Richard M Lipkin; Ning Qian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A population decoding framework for motion aftereffects on smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Stefanie N Tokiyama; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?

Authors:  Peggy Seriès; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.026

View more
  17 in total

1.  Hierarchy of direction-tuned motion adaptation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Hyun Ah Lee; Sang-Hun Lee
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The tactile speed aftereffect depends on the speed of adapting motion across the skin rather than other spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  Sarah McIntyre; Tatjana Seizova-Cajic; Alex O Holcombe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Separable temporal metrics for time perception and anticipatory actions.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Can speed be judged independent of direction?

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Rory Trevelyan Thomas; Oliver Braddick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  Moving sensory adaptation beyond suppressive effects in single neurons.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Evaluating comparative and equality judgments in contrast perception: attention alters appearance.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Is the homunculus "aware" of sensory adaptation?

Authors:  Peggy Seriès; Alan A Stocker; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Adaptation to one perceived motion direction can generate multiple velocity aftereffects.

Authors:  Nikos Gekas; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.

Authors:  Ahna R Girshick; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Adaptation maintains population homeostasis in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Andrea Benucci; Aman B Saleem; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.