Literature DB >> 19761321

Learning illumination- and orientation-invariant representations of objects through temporal association.

Guy Wallis1, Benjamin T Backus, Michael Langer, Gesche Huebner, Heinrich Bülthoff.   

Abstract

As the orientation or illumination of an object changes so does its appearance. This paper considers how observers are nonetheless able to recognize objects that have undergone such changes. In particular the paper tests the hypothesis that observers rely on temporal correlations between different object views to decide whether they are views of the same object or not. In a series of experiments subjects were shown a sequence of views representing a slowly transforming object. Testing revealed that subjects had formed object representations which were directly influenced by the temporal characteristics of the training views. In particular, introducing spurious correlations between views of different people's heads caused subjects to regard those views as being of a single person. This rapid and robust overriding of basic generalization processes supports the view that our recognition system tracks the correlated appearance of views of objects across time. Such view associations appear to allow the visual system to solve the view invariance problem without recourse to complex illumination models for extracting 3D form, or the use of the image plane transformations required to make appearance-based comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19761321     DOI: 10.1167/9.7.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  16 in total

1.  Stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in high-level vision.

Authors:  David B T McMahon; David A Leopold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Unsupervised natural visual experience rapidly reshapes size-invariant object representation in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Nuo Li; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Attention regulates the plasticity of multisensory timing.

Authors:  James Heron; Neil W Roach; David Whitaker; James V M Hanson
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Spatiotemporal information during unsupervised learning enhances viewpoint invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Unsupervised changes in core object recognition behavior are predicted by neural plasticity in inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Xiaoxuan Jia; Ha Hong; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Exploiting object constancy: effects of active exploration and shape morphing on similarity judgments of novel objects.

Authors:  Haemy Lee; Christian Wallraven
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neuronal learning of invariant object representation in the ventral visual stream is not dependent on reward.

Authors:  Nuo Li; James J Dicarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  What the human brain likes about facial motion.

Authors:  Johannes Schultz; Matthias Brockhaus; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Karin S Pilz
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Invariant object recognition based on extended fragments.

Authors:  Evgeniy Bart; Jay Hegdé
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing.

Authors:  Valérie Goffaux; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.