Literature DB >> 19761294

Integration of vision and haptics during tool use.

Chie Takahashi1, Jörn Diedrichsen, Simon J Watt.   

Abstract

When integrating signals from vision and haptics the brain must solve a "correspondence problem" so that it only combines information referring to the same object. An invariant spatial rule could be used when grasping with the hand: here the two signals should only be integrated when the estimate of hand and object position coincide. Tools complicate this relationship, however, because visual information about the object, and the location of the hand, are separated spatially. We show that when a simple tool is used to estimate size, the brain integrates visual and haptic information in a near-optimal fashion, even with a large spatial offset between the signals. Moreover, we show that an offset between the tool-tip and the object results in similar reductions in cross-modal integration as when the felt and seen positions of an object are offset in normal grasping. This suggests that during tool use the haptic signal is treated as coming from the tool-tip, not the hand. The brain therefore appears to combine visual and haptic information, not based on the spatial proximity of sensory stimuli, but based on the proximity of the distal causes of stimuli, taking into account the dynamics and geometry of tools.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19761294     DOI: 10.1167/9.6.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  17 in total

Review 1.  Principles of sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Daniel M Wolpert; Jörn Diedrichsen; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.

Authors:  Stefan Ladwig; Christine Sutter; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Causal inference accounts for heading perception in the presence of object motion.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Hyeshin Park; Michael Jansen; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Perceptual attraction in tool use: evidence for a reliability-based weighting mechanism.

Authors:  Nienke B Debats; Marc O Ernst; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Vision adds to haptics when dyads perform a whole-body joint balance task.

Authors:  Eric Eils; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Leonie Sieverding; Marc H E de Lussanet; Karen Zentgraf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual-haptic cue integration with spatial and temporal disparity during pointing movements.

Authors:  Sascha Serwe; Konrad P Körding; Julia Trommershäuser
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.

Authors:  Joshua D Bell; Kristen L Macuga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-23

9.  On the relevance of task instructions for the influence of action on perception.

Authors:  Wladimir Kirsch
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.157

10.  Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Alissa R Stover; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.