Literature DB >> 19760338

The study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in CAD (SPARC): design, rationale, and baseline patient characteristics of a prospective, multicenter observational registry comparing PET, SPECT, and CTA for resource utilization and clinical outcomes.

Rory Hachamovitch1, James R Johnson, Mark A Hlatky, Lisa Cantagallo, Barbara H Johnson, Martha Coughlan, Jon Hainer, Jeselle Gierbolini, Marcelo F Di Carli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To design a multicenter study comparing the prognostic value and post-test resource utilization of PET, CT Coronary Angiography (CTA), and SPECT in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Although PET, CTA, and SPECT are widely used, their relative clinical- and cost-effectiveness are undefined.
METHODS: The Study of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Anatomy Imaging Roles in CAD (SPARC) is a prospective, multicenter, observational registry that has enrolled 3019 patients undergoing clinically referred SPECT, PET, and CTA with the goal of comparing posttest resource utilization and comparative prognostic value. Resource utilization assessment will enroll intermediate-high likelihood patients without prior CAD, while prognostic assessment will include both these patients and patients with prior CAD. Secondary analyses include assessments of diagnostic accuracy, cost, and referral to revascularization. Sites recruited into at least two of the three imaging arms. Except for semi-quantitative interpretation, site protocols will be used for all imaging studies and images forwarded to an image repository. Follow-up for catheterization, revascularization, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, all-cause death and medication use changes will be performed at 90-day, 1, and 2 years. Standard statistical methods will be used to risk-adjust results within and between study arms. SPARC will have >85% power (two-sided test, alpha = 0.01) to detect a 5% catheterization rate difference at 90 days between the three arms and >90% power to detect a 2% difference in cardiac death, or nonfatal MI within 2 years of the index test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760338     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9140-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  10 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Evidence, appropriateness, and technology assessment in cardiology: a case study of computed tomography.

Authors:  Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Marcelo F Di Carli; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose.

Authors:  James P Earls; Elise L Berman; Bruce A Urban; Charlene A Curry; Judith L Lane; Robert S Jennings; Colin C McCulloch; Jiang Hsieh; John H Londt
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Bridging the detection gap chasm of risk: where can computed tomography angiography take us?

Authors:  Leslie Shaw; Jagat Narula
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-04

Review 7.  Methods and limitations of assessing new noninvasive tests: Part II: Outcomes-based validation and reliability assessment of noninvasive testing.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Sample size determinants for r X c comparative trials.

Authors:  J M Lachin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Rory Hachamovitch; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-05-27       Impact factor: 29.690

  10 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging: a commentary on the reported results from SPARC.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Economic evaluation of nuclear medicine procedures.

Authors:  Massimo Salvatori; Marco Oradei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Do imaging studies performed in physician offices increase downstream utilization?: an empiric analysis of cardiac stress testing with imaging.

Authors:  Jersey Chen; Reza Fazel; Joseph S Ross; Robert L McNamara; Andrew J Einstein; Mouaz Al-Mallah; Harlan M Krumholz; Brahmajee K Nallamothu
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06

5.  Has anyone been listening? Post-SPECT MPI referral rates to catheterization.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hill; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Lack of association between epicardial fat volume and extent of coronary artery calcification, severity of coronary artery disease, or presence of myocardial perfusion abnormalities in a diverse, symptomatic patient population: results from the CORE320 multicenter study.

Authors:  Yutaka Tanami; Masahiro Jinzaki; Satoru Kishi; Matthew Matheson; Andrea L Vavere; Carlos E Rochitte; Marc Dewey; Marcus Y Chen; Melvin E Clouse; Christopher Cox; Sachio Kuribayashi; Joao A C Lima; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Comparing outcomes and costs following cardiovascular imaging: a SPARC…but further illumination is needed.

Authors:  Todd C Villines; James K Min
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 8.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion and function with PET and PET/CT.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Arkadiusz Sitek; Stephen C Moore; Marcelo Di Carli; Sharmila Dorbala
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  What is the Value of CT Angiography for Patients with Acute Chest Pain?

Authors:  Hector M Medina; Carlos A Rojas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-01

Review 10.  Taking the perfect nuclear image: quality control, acquisition, and processing techniques for cardiac SPECT, PET, and hybrid imaging.

Authors:  James A Case; Timothy M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.