Literature DB >> 19760318

Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer patients.

Naoto Fukuda1, Yasuyuki Sugiyama, Akira Midorikawa, Hiroyuki Mushiake.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node metastasis is considered one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer. However, the optimal system for accurate staging of lymph node metastasis for patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. This study was designed to investigate the prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR), which is calculated by dividing the number of metastatic lymph nodes by the total number of nodes harvested from patients with gastric cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 186 consecutive patients diagnosed with gastric cancer who underwent curative gastrectomy at our hospital. The lymph node status was classified according to three systems:the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) system; the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) system; and an MLR-based system (MLR0: 0, MLR1: 0.01-0.19, MLR2: >or=0.2). The influence of the MLR on patient survival was determined using univariate Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the generalized Wilcoxon test, and analysis with the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of the patients with MLR0, MLR1, and MLR2 was 88.6%, 59.4%, and 13.4%, respectively. In addition to the MLR, the UICC/AJCC N category,JGCA n category, tumor stage (pT category), and tumor diameter significantly influenced the 5-year survival rate, as determined by univariate analysis. Multivariate analyses revealed that of the three factors used to stage lymph node involvement, MLR was the most significant prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS: The MLR is an important and easy-to-assess prognostic factor that should be considered for staging lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19760318     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0205-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  21 in total

1.  The superiority of ratio-based lymph node staging in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Kentaro Inoue; Yasushi Nakane; Hitoshi Iiyama; Mutsuya Sato; Tatsuya Kanbara; Koji Nakai; Syunichiro Okumura; Keigo Yamamichi; Koshiro Hioki
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Ratio of metastatic lymph nodes: impact on staging and survival of gastric cancer.

Authors:  R Persiani; S Rausei; A Biondi; S Boccia; F Cananzi; D D'Ugo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Metastatic/resected lymph nodes ratio-based classification in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Halil Ozgüç; Yalçin Sönmez; Omer Yerci
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.

Authors:  K Fujii; H Isozaki; K Okajima; E Nomura; M Niki; S Sako; N Izumi; H Mabuchi; K Nishiguchi; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  The National Cancer Data Base Report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy: Fifth Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the "different disease" hypothesis.

Authors:  S A Hundahl; J L Phillips; H R Menck
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience.

Authors:  Donato Nitti; Alberto Marchet; Matteo Olivieri; Alessandro Ambrosi; Roberto Mencarelli; Claudio Belluco; Mario Lise
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Adachi; T Kamakura; M Mori; H Baba; Y Maehara; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Lymph node counts in the upper abdomen: anatomical basis for lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  P K Wagner; A Ramaswamy; J Rüschoff; P Schmitz-Moormann; M Rothmund
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Prognostic significance of the ratio between metastatic and dissected lymph nodes (n ratio) in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Saito; Yoji Fukumoto; Tomohiro Osaki; Yoshinori Yamada; Kenji Fukuda; Shigeru Tatebe; Shunichi Tsujitani; Masahide Ikeguchi
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Effect of lymph node micrometastases on prognosis of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Ze-Yu Wu; Jing-Hua Li; Wen-Hua Zhan; Yu-Long He; Jin Wan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  19 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio on gastric cancer after curative distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Chang-Ming Huang; Jian-Xian Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Bi-Juan Lin; Jia-Bin Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Moving from lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer to biological markers.

Authors:  E Fatourou; D Ziogas; G Baltogiannis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prognostic impact of lymph node retrieval and ratio in gastric cancer: a U.S. single center experience.

Authors:  Joyce Wong; Shams Rahman; Nadia Saeed; Hui-Yi Lin; Khaldoun Almhanna; Ravi Shridhar; Sarah Hoffe; Kenneth L Meredith
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Accuracy of multidetector-row CT in diagnosing lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takuro Saito; Yukinori Kurokawa; Shuji Takiguchi; Yasuhiro Miyazaki; Tsuyoshi Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Hiroshi Miyata; Kiyokazu Nakajima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Prognostic significance of lymph node ratio in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexandra Fochtmann; Georg Haymerle; Rainer Kunstfeld; Johannes Pammer; Matthaeus Ch Grasl; Boban M Erovic
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  A long non-coding RNA signature to improve prognosis prediction of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Zhu; Xianglong Tian; Chenyang Yu; Chaoqin Shen; Tingting Yan; Jie Hong; Zheng Wang; Jing-Yuan Fang; Haoyan Chen
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Inverse association between visceral obesity and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Se Woo Park; Hang Lak Lee; Yong Won Ju; Dae Won Jun; Oh Young Lee; Dong Soo Han; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi; Joon Soo Hahm
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Hypoxia, tumour-associated macrophages, microvessel density, VEGF and matrix metalloproteinases in human gastric cancer: interaction and impact on survival.

Authors:  Sergej Osinsky; Larissa Bubnovskaya; Irina Ganusevich; Antonina Kovelskaya; Lilya Gumenyuk; Gennadij Olijnichenko; Sergej Merentsev
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Which method is more suitable for advanced gastric cancer with enlarged lymph nodes, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy or open gastrectomy?

Authors:  Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Ratio between negative and positive lymph nodes is suitable for evaluation the prognosis of gastric cancer patients with positive node metastasis.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Dan Sun; Yuan Pan; Li Zhang; Rupeng Zhang; Dianchang Wang; Xishan Hao; Han Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.