Literature DB >> 19759041

Comparative antibacterial effects of daptomycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Karen E Bowker1, Alan R Noel, Alasdair P MacGowan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the antibacterial effects (ABEs) of the free (f) drugs daptomycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA), using high and low inocula in a pharmacokinetic in vitro model. To determine the daptomycin fAUC/MIC ratio for a static effect and 3 log reduction in viable count and relate this target to the clinical breakpoint.
METHODS: Five clinical MRSA isolates held at Southmead Hospital were used (SMH 15841, SMH 40289, SMH 40275, SMH 33922 and SMH 33024) together with a VRSA isolate (SMH 19898); inocula of 10(6) and 10(8) cfu/mL were used. Daptomycin (6 mg/kg once daily), vancomycin (1 g twice daily) and teicoplanin (400 mg once daily) regimens were simulated. ABEs were measured using the 24 h area-under-the-bacterial kill curve (AUBKC) and log change in viable count at 24 h (Delta24). For daptomycin, dose escalation was used to determine the relationship between ABE and AUC/MIC.
RESULTS: Daptomycin was bactericidal against the MRSA strains. Daptomycin and vancomycin were active against the VRSA strain; teicoplanin had a static effect. The higher inoculum reduced the ABEs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that daptomycin had a superior ABE to teicoplanin and vancomycin. Daptomycin fAUC/MIC was related to AUBKC and Delta24; the fAUC/MIC ratios for a static effect and 1 log and 3 log drop were 37.2 +/- 16.5, 40.6 +/- 17.8 and 49.8 +/- 19.2, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: These data define the fAUC/MIC sizes for daptomycin for bacteriostatic and bactericidal ABEs and indicate that a 6 mg/kg dose of daptomycin is superior to vancomycin and teicoplanin against MRSA and VRSA strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19759041     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkp289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

1.  In vitro activities of daptomycin-, vancomycin-, and teicoplanin-loaded polymethylmethacrylate against methicillin-susceptible, methicillin-resistant, and vancomycin-intermediate strains of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yuhan Chang; Wen-Chien Chen; Pang-Hsin Hsieh; Dave W Chen; Mel S Lee; Hsin-Nung Shih; Steve W N Ueng
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Pharmacodynamics of telavancin studied in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model of infection.

Authors:  Alasdair P MacGowan; Alan R Noel; Sharon Tomaselli; Heather C Elliott; Karen E Bowker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Suppression of Emergence of Resistance in Pathogenic Bacteria: Keeping Our Powder Dry, Part 1.

Authors:  G L Drusano; Arnold Louie; Alasdair MacGowan; William Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Preferential emergence of reduced vancomycin susceptibility in health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates during continuous-infusion vancomycin therapy in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Sheryl Zelenitsky; Noha Alkurdi; Zhanni Weber; Robert Ariano; George Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to determine optimal administration of daptomycin in patients receiving standardized thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

Authors:  Nimish Patel; Katie Cardone; Darren W Grabe; Shari Meola; Christopher Hoy; Harold Manley; George L Drusano; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Evaluation of standard- and high-dose daptomycin versus linezolid against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Authors:  Ashley D Hall; Molly E Steed; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous daptomycin during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Katie E Cardone; Thomas P Lodise; Nimish Patel; Christopher D Hoy; Shari Meola; Harold J Manley; George L Drusano; Darren W Grabe
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Mao Hagihara; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of nemonoxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro infection model.

Authors:  Wang Liang; Yuan-cheng Chen; Yu-ran Cao; Xiao-fang Liu; Jun Huang; Jia-li Hu; Miao Zhao; Qing-lan Guo; Shu-jing Zhang; Xiao-jie Wu; De-mei Zhu; Ying-yuan Zhang; Jing Zhang
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a pooled sample of patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jill M Butterfield; Bruce A Mueller; Nimish Patel; Katie E Cardone; Darren W Grabe; Noha N Salama; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.