Literature DB >> 21282429

Use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles to determine optimal administration of daptomycin in patients receiving standardized thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

Nimish Patel1, Katie Cardone, Darren W Grabe, Shari Meola, Christopher Hoy, Harold Manley, George L Drusano, Thomas P Lodise.   

Abstract

This study identified optimal daptomycin dosing for patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis (HD). Twelve adult patients on HD received daptomycin at 6 mg/kg of body weight intravenously (i.v.) one time; plasma and dialysate samples were collected over 3 days. A 2-compartment model with separate HD and non-HD clearance terms was fit to the data. A series of 9,999-subject Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) was performed to identify HD dosing schemes providing efficacy and toxicity profiles comparable to those obtained for MCS employing the daptomycin population pharmacokinetic (PK) model derived from patients in the Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia-infective endocarditis (SAB-IE) study. For efficacy, we selected the HD dosing scheme which generated an area-under-the-curve (AUC) exposure profile comparable to that for the SAB-IE population model. For toxicity, we selected HD dosing schemes that minimized trough concentrations of ≥ 24.3 mg/liter. Separate HD dosing schemes were developed for each FDA-approved regimen and for two weekly interdialytic periods (48 and 72 h). Administration of the same parent daptomycin dose intra-HD and post-HD resulted in AUC, maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), and C(min) values most comparable to those for SAB-IE simulations for the 48-hour interdialytic period. In contrast, all candidate HD dosing schemes provided AUC(48-72) values that were at least 50% lower than the SAB-IE AUC(48-72) values. Increasing the parent dose by 50% provided more comparable AUC(48-72) values while maintaining acceptable C(min) values. Administration of the daptomycin parent dose intra-HD or post-HD was optimal for the 48-h interdialytic period. For the 72-h interdialytic period, clinicians should consider increasing the dose by 50% to achieve more comparable AUC(48-72) values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282429      PMCID: PMC3067175          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01224-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  14 in total

1.  National surveillance of dialysis associated diseases in the United States, 1995.

Authors:  J I Tokars; E R Miller; M J Alter; M J Arduino
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

2.  Daptomycin versus standard therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Vance G Fowler; Helen W Boucher; G Ralph Corey; Elias Abrutyn; Adolf W Karchmer; Mark E Rupp; Donald P Levine; Henry F Chambers; Francis P Tally; Gloria A Vigliani; Christopher H Cabell; Arthur Stanley Link; Ignace DeMeyer; Scott G Filler; Marcus Zervos; Paul Cook; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Jack M Bernstein; Connie Savor Price; Graeme N Forrest; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Marcelo Gareca; Susan J Rehm; Hans Reinhardt Brodt; Alan Tice; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Daptomycin exposure and the probability of elevations in the creatine phosphokinase level: data from a randomized trial of patients with bacteremia and endocarditis.

Authors:  Sujata M Bhavnani; Christopher M Rubino; Paul G Ambrose; George L Drusano
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin in a murine thigh model of Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  A Louie; P Kaw; W Liu; N Jumbe; M H Miller; G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Mortality caused by sepsis in patients with end-stage renal disease compared with the general population.

Authors:  M J Sarnak; B L Jaber
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Once-daily dosing in dogs optimizes daptomycin safety.

Authors:  F B Oleson; C L Berman; J B Kirkpatrick; K S Regan; J J Lai; F P Tally
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  New national surveillance system for hemodialysis-associated infections: initial results.

Authors:  Jerome I Tokars; Elaine R Miller; Gary Stein
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Pharmacodynamic profile of daptomycin against Enterococcus species and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model.

Authors:  Prachi K Dandekar; Pamela R Tessier; Peter Williams; Charlie H Nightingale; David P Nicolau
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-08-13       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Intradialytic administration of daptomycin in end stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Noha N Salama; Jonathan H Segal; Mariann D Churchwell; Jignesh H Patel; Lihong Gao; Michael Heung; Bruce A Mueller
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  In vivo pharmacodynamic activity of daptomycin.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; David Andes; W A Craig
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  7 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in a patient with severe renal failure not receiving dialysis.

Authors:  Sandrine Marchand; Maider Lauda; Gwenael Le Moal; Patrice Gobin; William Couet; France Roblot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics in Adolescents Undergoing Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis: A Case Series With Pharmacokinetic Modeling.

Authors:  Sin Yin Lim; Teresa Lewis; Sukyung Woo; Martin Turman; David W A Bourne; Michael E Burton; Pornpimol Rianthavorn
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections in the intensive care unit: a review.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; John P Kirby; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Daptomycin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in a pooled sample of patients receiving thrice-weekly hemodialysis.

Authors:  Jill M Butterfield; Bruce A Mueller; Nimish Patel; Katie E Cardone; Darren W Grabe; Noha N Salama; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  High-Dose Daptomycin and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Timothy W Jones; Ah Hyun Jun; Jessica L Michal; William J Olney
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 6.  Post-Dialysis Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy in Patients Receiving Intermittent High-Flux Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Christo Cimino; Yvonne Burnett; Nikunj Vyas; Anne H Norris
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.431

7.  Population pharmacokinetics of daptomycin in adult patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoying Xu; Dmytro Khadzhynov; Harm Peters; Ricardo L Chaves; Kamal Hamed; Micha Levi; Natascia Corti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 4.335

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.