Literature DB >> 19758662

Location of the primary tumor is not an independent predictor of cancer specific mortality in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Hendrik Isbarn1, Claudio Jeldres, Shahrokh F Shariat, Daniel Liberman, Maxine Sun, Giovanni Lughezzani, Hugues Widmer, Philippe Arjane, Daniel Pharand, Margit Fisch, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of renal pelvis vs ureteral upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma tumor location is controversial. We assessed the prognostic significance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma tumor location in a large, population based data set.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our analyses relied on 2,824 patients treated with nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma within 9 SEER registries between 1988 and 2004. Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of tumor location on cancer specific mortality rates. Covariates consisted of age, race, SEER registry, gender, type of surgery (nephroureterectomy with vs without bladder cuff removal), pT stage, pN stage, grade and year of surgery.
RESULTS: Relative to ureteral tumors renal pelvis tumors were of higher stage (T3/T4 disease 38.4% vs 57.9%, p <0.001) and had a higher rate of lymph node metastases (6.0% vs 9.8%, p = 0.003) at nephroureterectomy. The respective 5-year cancer specific mortality-free survival estimates were 81.0% vs 75.5% (p = 0.007). However, after multivariable adjustment tumor location failed to reach independent predictor status of cancer specific mortality (p = 0.8).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the largest cohort in which the impact of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma tumor location on cancer specific mortality was examined. At nephroureterectomy renal pelvis tumors had significantly more advanced T and N stages compared to ureteral tumors. However, after adjustment for stage, grade and other covariates tumor location did not independently predict cancer specific mortality. Thus, the biological behavior of renal pelvis vs ureteral tumors is the same after nephroureterectomy as long as stage, grade, and other patient and tumor characteristics are accounted for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19758662     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

1.  [Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: clinical and pathological criteria and their predictive implications after radical nephroureterectomy].

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Paul Schramek
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  [Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. An update on clinical and pathological prognostic factors].

Authors:  M Rink; M Adam; J Hansen; F K Chun; S A Ahyai; M Remzi; T Schlomm; O Engel; R Heuer; C Eichelberg; M Fisch; R Dahlem; S F Shariat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Comparison of post-operative intravesical recurrence and oncological outcomes after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Lujia Zou; Limin Zhang; Hu Zhang; Haowen Jiang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Risk stratification of metastatic recurrence in invasive upper urinary tract carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy without lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Pierre Colin; Tarek P Ghoneim; Laurent Nison; Thomas Seisen; Eric Lechevallier; Xavier Cathelineau; Adil Ouzzane; Marc Zerbib; Jean-Alexandre Long; Alain Ruffion; Sébastien Crouzet; Olivier Cussenot; Marie Audouin; Jacques Irani; Solène Gardic; Pascal Gres; François Audenet; Mathieu Roumiguié; Antoine Valeri; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 6.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Specific body mass index cut-off value in relation to survival of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Kazumasa Komura; Toshikazu Watsuji; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Molecular profile of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: are pelvicalyceal and ureteral tumors different?

Authors:  Laura-Maria Krabbe; Aditya Bagrodia; Mary E Westerman; Bishoy A Gayed; Ahmed Q Haddad; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Shahrokh F Shariat; Payal Kapur; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 10.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Authors:  Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat; Seth P Lerner; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Michael Rink; Wassim Kassouf; Philippe E Spiess; Yair Lotan; Dingwei Ye; Mario I Fernández; Eiji Kikuchi; Daher C Chade; Marko Babjuk; Arthur P Grollman; George N Thalmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.