Literature DB >> 19757126

Macrofaunal recolonisation following the intertidal placement of fine-grained dredged material.

Stefan George Bolam1, Jon Barry, Michaela Schratzberger, Paul Whomersley, Mike Dearnaley.   

Abstract

Dredged material is increasingly being regarded as a potential resource, and one of its many uses is to create and/or improve intertidal habitats (i.e. beneficial use). However, uncertainties over the longer-term environmental consequences of such schemes have, to date, limited the practice to small-scale applications in UK waters. This paper studies the macrofaunal recolonisation of fine-grained dredged material recharged concurrently at four adjacent recharge areas along the south-east coast of the UK in order to facilitate predictions regarding the recolonisation of comparable schemes and, thereby, to promote effective environmental management. During the 2-year study period, the four recharge areas were distinctly different in terms of their environmental characteristics, primarily wave exposure and bed level. These conditions resulted in different macrofaunal recolonisation rates and community structures. While the low-level, wave-sheltered area experienced rapid recolonisation, the process was delayed until 12 months post-recharge at the relatively wave-exposed areas. Bed level differences resulted in distinctly different communities in wave-sheltered areas but not under wave-exposed conditions. While we are unable to separate the effects of individual environmental variables on recolonisation, these results provide general conclusions as to the importance of environmental conditions on resulting macrofaunal communities.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19757126     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1130-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  5 in total

1.  Selection and prioritisation procedure of hazardous substances for the marine environment within OSPAR/DYNAMEC. Oslo and Paris Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North East Atlantic.

Authors:  Suzanne Wiandt; Heinz-Jochen Poremski
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Development of macrofaunal communities on dredged material used for mudflat enhancement: a comparison of three beneficial use schemes after one year.

Authors:  S G Bolam; P Whomersley
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Macro- and meiofaunal recolonisation of dredged material used for habitat enhancement: temporal patterns in community development.

Authors:  S G Bolam; M Schratzberger; P Whomersley
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  The effects of meiofauna on settling macrofauna: meiofauna may structure macrofaunal communities.

Authors:  Mary C Watzin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Minimizing impacts of maintenance dredged material disposal in the coastal environment: a habitat approach.

Authors:  Stefan G Bolam; Hubert L Rees
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.266

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Burial survival of benthic macrofauna following deposition of simulated dredged material.

Authors:  Stefan George Bolam
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.513

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.