Literature DB >> 15664032

Development of macrofaunal communities on dredged material used for mudflat enhancement: a comparison of three beneficial use schemes after one year.

S G Bolam1, P Whomersley.   

Abstract

In recent years, dredged material has become regarded as a potential resource and used to create and/or improve intertidal habitats ('beneficial use' schemes). This paper presents the results of a sampling programme to investigate the short-term macrofaunal recovery of three beneficial use schemes in south-east England in terms of species and functional diversity. Environmental parameters (sediment redox potential, and water, organic carbon and silt/clay contents) and univariate community attributes (total individuals and species, diversity, evenness and biomass) at the recharge sites had attained reference levels at two schemes while assemblages differed significantly in terms of species composition at all three schemes. While trophic group proportionality had re-established at one scheme, an increased grazer dominance was apparent at another while the proportion of sub-surface deposit feeders decreased at the third. Total individuals and species number of the developing communities were negatively correlated with sediment redox potential at 4 cm and % silt/clay, respectively. The implications of these results for monitoring the recovery of future fine-grained beneficial use schemes are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15664032     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  5 in total

1.  Burial survival of benthic macrofauna following deposition of simulated dredged material.

Authors:  Stefan George Bolam
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  A screening procedure for selecting the most suitable dredged material placement site at the sea. The case of the South Euboean Gulf, Greece.

Authors:  V Kapsimalis; I P Panagiotopoulos; I Hatzianestis; T D Kanellopoulos; C Tsangaris; E Kaberi; H Kontoyiannis; G Rousakis; C Kyriakidou; G A Hatiris
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-06-30       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Macrofaunal recolonisation following the intertidal placement of fine-grained dredged material.

Authors:  Stefan George Bolam; Jon Barry; Michaela Schratzberger; Paul Whomersley; Mike Dearnaley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 4.  Using in situ management to conserve biodiversity under climate change.

Authors:  Owen Greenwood; Hannah L Mossman; Andrew J Suggitt; Robin J Curtis; Ilya M D Maclean
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 6.528

5.  Short-term impact of sediment addition on plants and invertebrates in a southern California salt marsh.

Authors:  Kaelin J McAtee; Karen M Thorne; Christine R Whitcraft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.