Literature DB >> 28310229

The effects of meiofauna on settling macrofauna: meiofauna may structure macrofaunal communities.

Mary C Watzin1.   

Abstract

When macrofaunal larvae and juveniles recruit into the benthos, they are in the same size catagory as the meiofauna. These small size classes have been consistently ignored in macrofaunal studies despite the increasingly accepted idea that communities are structured not only by interactions between adults, but also by interactions which occurred when the animals were young and in the meiofaunal size catagory. I have tested the effects of turbellarians and other meiofauna on settling macrofaunal larvae and young juveniles in a one-week field experiment. Increased densities of both turbellarians and other meiofauna (tested separately) significantly reduced densities of juvenile spionids and deposit feeders. Syllid abundances increased in high density turbellarian treatments. Nereid polychaete, other predatory polychaete, and bivalve densities showed no significant differences among treatments. By both altering densities and acting selectively on various groups of macrofaunal juveniles, meiofauna may significantly affect the structure of macrofaunal communities.

Year:  1983        PMID: 28310229     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  4 in total

1.  On the importance of marine meiofauna for benthos communities.

Authors:  S A Gerlach
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Food-chain relationships in subtidal silty sand marine sediments and the role of meiofauna in stimulating bacterial productivity.

Authors:  Sebastian A Gerlach
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Field evidence that shrimp predation regulates meiofauna.

Authors:  Susan S Bell; Bruce C Coull
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The mucus-trap hypothesis on feeding of aquatic nematodes and implications for biodegradation and sediment texture.

Authors:  Franz Riemann; Marion Schrage
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Macrofaunal recolonisation following the intertidal placement of fine-grained dredged material.

Authors:  Stefan George Bolam; Jon Barry; Michaela Schratzberger; Paul Whomersley; Mike Dearnaley
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Foraminifera may structure meiobenthic communities.

Authors:  G Thomas Chandler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Spatial heterogeneity of benthic copepods: a comparative aspect on composition, abundance, and correlation.

Authors:  R Jayabarathi; G Padmavati; I Anandavelu
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  The curious and neglected soft-bodied meiofauna: Rouphozoa (Gastrotricha and Platyhelminthes).

Authors:  Maria Balsamo; Tom Artois; Julian P S Smith; M Antonio Todaro; Loretta Guidi; Brian S Leander; Niels W L Van Steenkiste
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.694

5.  Relationships between meiofaunal biodiversity and prokaryotic heterotrophic production in different tropical habitats and oceanic regions.

Authors:  Antonio Pusceddu; Cristina Gambi; Cinzia Corinaldesi; Mariaspina Scopa; Roberto Danovaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biodiversity loss and turnover in alternative states in the Mediterranean Sea: a case study on meiofauna.

Authors:  Silvia Bianchelli; Emanuela Buschi; Roberto Danovaro; Antonio Pusceddu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Impairment of microbial and meiofaunal ecosystem functions linked to algal forest loss.

Authors:  Silvia Bianchelli; Roberto Danovaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.