Literature DB >> 16572441

Comparison of etanercept and methotrexate, alone and combined, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: two-year clinical and radiographic results from the TEMPO study, a double-blind, randomized trial.

Désirée van der Heijde1, Lars Klareskog, Vicente Rodriguez-Valverde, Catalin Codreanu, Horatiu Bolosiu, Jose Melo-Gomes, Jesus Tornero-Molina, Joseph Wajdula, Ronald Pedersen, Saeed Fatenejad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, including radiographic changes, and safety of etanercept and methotrexate (MTX), used in combination and alone, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in whom previous treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug other than MTX had failed.
METHODS: Patients with RA were treated with etanercept (25 mg subcutaneously twice weekly), oral MTX (up to 20 mg weekly), or combination therapy with etanercept plus MTX through a second year, in a double-blinded manner. Clinical response was assessed using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and the Disease Activity Score (DAS), in a modified intent-to-treat analysis with the last observation carried forward (LOCF) and in a population of completers. Radiographs of the hands, wrists, and forefeet were scored for erosions and joint space narrowing at annual intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 503 of 686 patients continued into year 2 of the study. During the 2 years, significantly fewer patients receiving combination therapy withdrew from the study (29% of the combination therapy group, 39% of the etanercept group, and 48% of the MTX group). Both the LOCF and the completer analyses yielded similar results. The ACR 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses and the remission rates (based on a DAS of <1.6) were significantly higher with combination therapy than with either monotherapy (P<0.01). Similarly, improvement in disability (based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire) was greater with combination therapy (P<0.01). The combination therapy group showed significantly less radiographic progression than did either group receiving monotherapy (P<0.05); moreover, radiographic progression was significantly lower in the etanercept group compared with the MTX group (P<0.05). For the second consecutive year, overall disease progression in the combination therapy group was negative, with the 95% confidence interval less than zero. Adverse events were similar in the 3 treatment groups.
CONCLUSION: Etanercept in combination with MTX reduced disease activity, slowed radiographic progression, and improved function more effectively than did either monotherapy over a 2-year period. No increase in toxicity was associated with combination treatment with etanercept plus MTX.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16572441     DOI: 10.1002/art.21655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  157 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases with biologic agents: opportunities and risks for the elderly.

Authors:  Alejandro Diaz-Borjon; Cornelia M Weyand; Jörg J Goronzy
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 4.032

2.  Injection-site burning and stinging in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using injectable biologics.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Coburn Hobar; Kevin Hansbrough
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 2.580

3.  Cost-effectiveness modeling of abatacept versus other biologic agents in DMARDS and anti-TNF inadequate responders for the management of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anthony Russell; Ariel Beresniak; Louis Bessette; Boulos Haraoui; Proton Rahman; Carter Thorne; Ross Maclean; Danielle Dupont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Trials in rheumatoid arthritis: choosing the right outcome measure when minimal disease is achievable.

Authors:  David T Felson; Bin Zhang; Jeffrey N Siegel
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Matrix Metalloproteinases-3 Baseline Serum Levels in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients without Initial Radiographic Changes: A Two-Year Ultrasonographic Study.

Authors:  Slavica Z Prodanovic; Goran Radunovic; Dragan Babic; Biljana Ristic; Mirjana Sefik-Bukilica; Maja Zlatanovic; Katarina Simic-Pasalic; Srdjan Seric; Nada Vujasinovic-Stupar; Janko Samardzic; Nemanja Damjanov
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 6.  Leveling the field in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologic therapies: equal access for equal efficacy.

Authors:  Anthony S Russell; Wojtek P Olszynski; K S Davison; Cheryl Koehn; Boulos Haraoui
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Golimumab.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Pappas; Joan M Bathon; Delphine Hanicq; Uma Yasothan; Peter Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  Inhibition of periarticular bone loss is associated with clinical remission and ACR70-Response in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Anica Nussbaum; Diane M Renz; Christian Jung; Peter Oelzner; Ansgar Malich; Gunter Wolf; Joachim Böttcher
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29

10.  Folate metabolic pathway single nucleotide polymorphisms: a predictive pharmacogenetic marker of methotrexate response in Indian (Asian) patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yogita Ghodke-Puranik; Amrutesh S Puranik; Pooja Shintre; Kalpana Joshi; Bhushan Patwardhan; Jatinder Lamba; Timothy B Niewold; Arvind Chopra
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.