| Literature DB >> 19756159 |
O Carvajal-Zarrabal1, P M Hayward-Jones, Z Orta-Flores, C Nolasco-Hipólito, D M Barradas-Dermitz, M G Aguilar-Uscanga, M F Pedroza-Hernández.
Abstract
The effect of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Hs) calyx extract on fat absorption-excretion and body weight in rats, was investigated. Rats were fed with either a basal diet (SDC = Control diet) or the same diet supplemented with Hs extracts at 5%, 10% and 15% (SD(5), SD(10) and SD(15)). Only SD(5) did not show significant increases in weight, food consumption and efficiency compared to SD(C). The opposite occurred in SD(15) group which showed a significant decrease for these three parameters. The SD(10) responses were similar to SD(15), with the exception of food consumption. In both SD(C) and SD(5) groups, no body weight loss was observed; however, only in the latter group was there a significantly greater amount of fatty acids found in feces. A collateral effect emerging from the study is that components of Hs extract at the intermediate and greater concentrations used in this experiment could be considered possible antiobesity agents.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19756159 PMCID: PMC2742648 DOI: 10.1155/2009/394592
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Biotechnol ISSN: 1110-7243
Composition of basal and experimental diets. Experimental diets are Basal diet plus Hibiscus sabdariffa ethanol calyx extract (Diet formulated according to AIN-93 G formulation).
| Ingredient | Basal diet (g) |
|---|---|
| Cornstarch | 35.5 |
| Casein | 20.0 |
| Dextrinized cornstarch | 13.2 |
| Sucrose | 10.0 |
| Cellulose | 5.0 |
| Mineral mix AING-93 G | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix AING-93 G | 1.0 |
| L-Cysteine | 0.30 |
| Choline bitartrate | 0.25 |
| Ter-butylhydroquinone | 0.014 |
| Lard | 10.0 |
| Cholesterol | 1.0 |
| Cholic acid | 0.25 |
Growth parameters and fecal weight in rats treated with Hibiscus sabdariffa L. extract, A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means of the studied groups with post hoc Duncan multiple range tests at 5% and 1% for those results where a significant difference was indicated.
| Parameters | Dietary groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (SDC) | SD5 | SD10 | SD15 | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 260 ± 7 | 261 ± 11 | 338 ± 10 | 261 ± 2 |
| Final body weight (g) | 307 ± 9 | 306 ± 11 | 356 ± 11 | 267 ± 4 |
| Body weight gain (g) | 47 ± 7 | 45 ± 5 | 18 ± 4** | 6 ± 2** |
| Food intake (g/d) | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 14.2 ± 0.8 | 13.8 ± 0.6 | 12.1 ± 1.1* |
| Food efficiency (g body weight gain/g food intake) | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.3* | 0.5 ± 0.2** |
| Fecal dry weight (g/d) | 1.25 ± 0.08 | 1.42 ± 0.12* | 0.81 ± 0.05** | 0.75 ± 0.09** |
Statistical differences (*P < .05; **P < .01), when compared with the control group.
Apparent fat absorption and fecal fat excretion in rats fed with H. sabdariffa L. extract, A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means of the studied groups with post hoc Duncan multiple range tests at 5% and 1% for those results where a significant difference was indicated.
| Parameters | Dietary groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control SDC | SD5 | SD10 | SD15 | |
| Fatty acid absorption (%) | 95.1 ± 0.31 | 91.4 ± 1.01** | 93.6 ± 1.83 | 95.2 ± 0.89 |
| Fatty acid excretion ( | ||||
| 14 : 0 | 7 ± 1 | 12 ± 1 | 5 ± 1** | 5 ± 1** |
| 16 : 0 | 20 ± 4 | 396 ± 40** | 140 ± 7* | 89 ± 6* |
| 16 : 1 | 8 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 | 9 ± 1 |
| 18 : 0 | 289 ± 97 | 437 ± 58** | 55 ± 5** | 33 ± 5** |
| 18 : 1 | 8 ± 1 | 62 ± 9** | 17 ± 2* | 14 ± 1* |
| 18 : 2 (n-6) | 9 ± 1 | 18 ± 2** | 18 ± 2** | 18 ± 1** |
Statistical differences (*P < .05; **P < .01), when compared with the control group.