Literature DB >> 19755281

Randomised comparison of Nobori, biolimus A9-eluting coronary stent with a Taxus(R), paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent in patients with stenosis in native coronary arteries: the Nobori 1 trial.

Bernard Chevalier1, Patrick W Serruys, Sigmund Silber, Eulogio Garcia, Harry Suryapranata, Karl Hauptmann, William Wijns, Gerhard Schuler, Farzin Fath-Ordoubadi, Stephen Worthley, Leif Thuesen, Ian Meredith, Marco Bressers, Hirofumi Nagai, Dragica Paunovic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We studied the Nobori coronary stent coated with a bioabsorbable polymer and the anti-proliferative agent Biolimus A9 which may reduce neointimal formation. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions in up to two native coronary arteries, in 29 centres across Europe, Asia and Australia were randomly (2:1) assigned to receive the Biolimus A9 eluting stent Nobori (85 patients) or paclitaxel eluting stent Taxus(R) (35 patients). The two groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The primary end point of non-inferiority for in-stent late loss of Nobori stent versus Taxus(R) stent, at 9 months, was reached with the values of 0.15+/-0.27 mm with Nobori stent and 0.32+/-0.33 mm with Taxus(R) stent (p=0.006). Neointimal volume obstruction was 2.2+/-6.0% and 8.9+/-9.2% for Nobori and Taxus(R) stent respectively (p=0.017). The rates of death, myocardial infarction and any target vessel revascularisation at 9 months were 0%, 4.7%, and 7.1% respectively for Nobori stent, and 0%, 8.6% and 14.3% respectively for Taxus(R) stent. Clinically-driven target lesion revascularisation rate was 0% for Nobori stent and 2.9% for Taxus(R) stent. Stent thrombosis rates at 9 months were 0% in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In this trial the Nobori Biolimus A9 eluting stent proved to be safe and effective in reducing neointimal proliferation. The long term safety remains to be confirmed during the extended follow-up period of 5 years.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19755281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  10 in total

1.  Drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ma; Tim Wu; Michael P Robich; Xingwei Wang; Hao Wu; Bryan Buchholz; Stephen McCarthy
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  A clinical evaluation of the ProNOVA XR polymer-free sirolimus eluting coronary stent system in the treatment of patients with de novo coronary artery lesions (EURONOVA XR I study).

Authors:  Jacek Legutko; Wojciech Zasada; Grzegorz L Kałuża; Grzegorz Heba; Lukasz Rzeszutko; Jacek Jakala; Jacek Dragan; Artur Klecha; Dawid Giszterowicz; Wojciech Dobrowolski; Lukasz Partyka; Swaminathan Jayaraman; Dariusz Dudek
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-07-21

3.  Differences of side branch jailing between left main-left anterior descending artery stenting and left main-left circumflex artery stenting with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent.

Authors:  Fumiaki Nakao; Takayuki Okamura; Takeshi Suetomi; Jutaro Yamada; Takeshi Nakamura; Tooru Ueda; Takamasa Oda; Masashi Kanemoto; Yasuhiro Ikeda; Takashi Fujii; Masafumi Yano
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  The pharmacokinetics of Biolimus A9 after elution from the Nobori stent in patients with coronary artery disease: the NOBORI PK study.

Authors:  Miodrag Ostojic; Dragan Sagic; Robert Jung; Yan-Ling Zhang; Milan Nedeljkovic; Ljupco Mangovski; Sinisa Stojkovic; Dragan Debeljacki; Mirko Colic; Branko Beleslin; Bratislav Milosavljevic; Dejan Orlic; Dragan Topic; Nevena Karanovic; Dragica Paunovic; Uwe Christians
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison of the safety and efficacy of biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianfeng Lv; Yazhou Wu; Xingmei Zhang; Tao Jing; Li Zhang; Shifei Tong; Zhiyuan Song; Mingli Wang; Gang Wang; Luxiang Chi
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Clinical performance of biodegradable versus permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Q I Wang; Y U Zhou; Tong Qiao; Min Zhou
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Current State of Bioabsorbable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents.

Authors:  Abhilash Akinapelli; Jack P Chen; Kristine Roy; Joseph Donnelly; Keith Dawkins; Barbara Huibregtse; Dongming Hou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2017

Review 8.  The Use of Bioactive Polymers for Intervention and Tissue Engineering: The New Frontier for Cardiovascular Therapy.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Antonio Nenna; Domenico Larobina; Giorgia Martuscelli; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Massimo Chello; Luigi Ambrosio
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.329

9.  Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Kenneth Tandjung; Bimmer Claessen; Felicita Andreotti; Mariusz Kowalewski; David E Kandzari; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Laura Mauri; Ian T Meredith; Aloke V Finn; Hyo-Soo Kim; Jacek Kubica; Harry Suryapranata; Toni Mustahsani Aprami; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Clemens von Birgelen; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-06

Review 10.  Efficacy and safety of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yicong Ye; Hongzhi Xie; Yong Zeng; Xiliang Zhao; Zhuang Tian; Shuyang Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.