Literature DB >> 19750569

Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Srinivas R Puli1, Yasuo Kakugawa, Takuji Gotoda, Daphne Antillon, Yutaka Saito, Mainor R Antillon.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the proportion of successful complete cure en-bloc resections of large colorectal polyps achieved by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
METHODS: Studies using the EMR technique to resect large colorectal polyps were selected. Successful complete cure en-bloc resection was defined as one piece margin-free polyp resection. Articles were searched for in Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Control Trial Registry, among other sources.
RESULTS: An initial search identified 2620 reference articles, from which 429 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 25 studies (n = 5221) which met the inclusion criteria. All the studies used snares to perform EMR. Pooled proportion of en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 62.85% (95% CI: 51.50-73.52). The pooled proportion for complete cure en-bloc resections using a random effect model was 58.66% (95% CI: 47.14-69.71). With higher patient load (> 200 patients), this complete cure en-bloc resection rate improves from 44.19% (95% CI: 24.31-65.09) to 69.17% (95% CI: 51.11-84.61).
CONCLUSION: EMR is an effective technique for the resection of large colorectal polyps and offers an alternative to surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19750569      PMCID: PMC2744182          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.4273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  29 in total

1.  A new endoscopic mucosal resection procedure using an insulation-tipped electrosurgical knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases.

Authors:  T Gotoda; H Kondo; H Ono; Y Saito; H Yamaguchi; D Saito; T Yokota
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Outcome of endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: review of the Japanese literature.

Authors:  T Kojima; A Parra-Blanco; H Takahashi; R Fujita
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

Authors:  A R Jadad; R A Moore; D Carroll; C Jenkinson; D J Reynolds; D J Gavaghan; H J McQuay
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-02

4.  Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; M Mazumdar
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Endoscopic treatment of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  Massimo Conio; Alan J Cameron; Amitabh Chak; Sabrina Blanchi; Rosangela Filiberti
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Large sessile colonic adenomas: use of argon plasma coagulator to supplement piecemeal snare polypectomy.

Authors:  J Zlatanic; J D Waye; P S Kim; P J Baiocco; G W Gleim
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm.

Authors:  S Tanaka; K Haruma; S Oka; R Takahashi; M Kunihiro; Y Kitadai; M Yoshihara; F Shimamoto; K Chayama
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Effectiveness of glycerol as a submucosal injection for EMR.

Authors:  Toshio Uraoka; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Tetsuya Sumiyoshi; Fabian Emura; Pradeep Bhandari; Takahisa Matsuda; Kuang-I Fu; Daizo Saito
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Endoscopic resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer: is it feasible?

Authors:  Y J Kawamura; Y Sugamata; K Yoshino; Y Abo; S Nara; T Sumita; R Setoyama; Y Kiribuchi; N Kawano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  D P Hurlstone; D S Sanders; S S Cross; I Adam; A J Shorthouse; S Brown; K Drew; A J Lobo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  34 in total

1.  Endoscopic mucosal resection: who and how?

Authors:  Jayan Mannath; Krish Ragunath
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Importance of histological evaluation in endoscopic resection of early colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Nobuaki Yagi; Akio Yanagisawa
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2012-04-15

4.  Recurrence with malignancy after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps with high-grade dysplasia: incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Neal Mehta; Ashraf Abushahin; Meena Sadaps; Mohammad Alomari; John Vargo; Deepa Patil; Rocio Lopez; Matthew Kalady; Conor P Delaney; Emre Gorgun; James Church; Yutaka Saito; Carol A Burke; Amit Bhatt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A novel flexible endoluminal stapling device for use in NOTES colotomy closure: a feasibility study using an ex vivo porcine model.

Authors:  Mikael Sodergren; James Clark; John Beardsley; Ted Bryant; Kenneth Horton; Ara Darzi; Julian Teare
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A new technique of totally laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) for large rectal adenoma.

Authors:  X-M Zhang; Z Wang; H-R Hou; Z-X Zhou
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro conventional/laparoscopic resection].

Authors:  S Rüth; J Spatz; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro-endoscopic removal].

Authors:  A Probst; H Messmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Factors influencing quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ronald V Romero; Sanjiv Mahadeva
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-02-16

10.  Acute appendicitis following endoscopic mucosal resection of cecal adenoma.

Authors:  Yukako Nemoto; Junya Tokuhisa; Nagasato Shimada; Tatsuya Gomi; Iruru Maetani
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.