Literature DB >> 21533972

A novel flexible endoluminal stapling device for use in NOTES colotomy closure: a feasibility study using an ex vivo porcine model.

Mikael Sodergren1, James Clark, John Beardsley, Ted Bryant, Kenneth Horton, Ara Darzi, Julian Teare.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With advances in endoscopic diagnosis of early-stage gastrointestinal pathology, the need to offer minimally invasive treatment is attracting significant interest. It is essential that secure and consistent closure of full-thickness colonic resections and colotomy access be provided in natural orifice translumenal surgery (NOTES). This ex vivo porcine study aimed to evaluate a novel prototype flexible endoscopic stapler device for use in closure of full-thickness colonic defects.
METHODS: A feasibility study using ex vivo porcine colon was undertaken to explore the potential of the prototype stapler to close and seal a colotomy. A standardized linear colotomy was created in 30 colons. The novel flexible endostapler was used to close 20, interrupted hand-sewn sutures to close 5, and a well-validated linear stapler to close 5 of these colotomies. The colons were subsequently subjected to leak pressure testing.
RESULTS: The colotomy closure using the prototype stapler endoluminally required a median time of 280 s. No statistically significant difference in leak pressures between the stapler and the other techniques was described. Although the endostapler without any colotomy was found to have the highest median leak pressures and the interrupted sutures the lowest pressures, no significant difference could be demonstrated (p = 0.52). Furthermore, no significant difference was demonstrated when the closure integrity created by the flexible stapler was compared with that created by the well-validated linear stapler.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the flexible endoscopic stapler is an effective device for the safe closure of a visceral defect, which in this feasibility study was equivalent to other well-established techniques. Further studies will focus on in vivo application of the prototype stapling device in the setting of full-thickness colonic resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21533972     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1703-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Complete endoscopic closure of gastric defects using a full-thickness tissue plicating device.

Authors:  Michael F McGee; Jeffrey M Marks; Judy Jin; Christina Williams; Amitabh Chak; Steve J Schomisch; Jamie Andrews; Shoichi Okada; Jeffrey L Ponsky
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The Queen's closure: a novel technique for closure of endoscopic gastrotomy for natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  L C Hookey; V Khokhotva; B Bielawska; A Samis; D Jalink; D Hurlbut; D Mercer
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  In vitro comparison and evaluation of seven gastric closure modalities for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  R P Voermans; A M Worm; M I van Berge Henegouwen; P Breedveld; W A Bemelman; P Fockens
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer.

Authors:  W Lee; D Lee; S Choi; H Chun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.

Authors:  H Iizuka; S Okamura; Y Onozato; H Ishihara; S Kakizaki; M Mori
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol       Date:  2009-09-16

6.  Endoscopic colotomy closure for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery using a T-fastener prototype in comparison to conventional laparoscopic suture closure.

Authors:  Emanuel Sporn; Sharon L Bachman; Brent W Miedema; Timothy S Loy; Robert Calaluce; Klaus Thaler
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Srinivas R Puli; Yasuo Kakugawa; Takuji Gotoda; Daphne Antillon; Yutaka Saito; Mainor R Antillon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities.

Authors:  M Ryou; D G Fong; R D Pai; D W Rattner; C C Thompson
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  A prospective randomized study with a 5-year minimum follow-up evaluation of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision after neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  G Lezoche; M Baldarelli; Mario Guerrieri; A M Paganini; A De Sanctis; S Bartolacci; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the management of rectal cancer with a focus on early carcinoma.

Authors:  James Clark; Paul Ziprin
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.404

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status.

Authors:  Arthur Schmidt; Benjamin Meier; Karel Caca
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  A novel single-stapling technique for colorectal anastomosis: a pre-ligation single-stapling technique (L-SST) in a porcine model.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takeyama; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Taishi Hata; Yusuke Takahashi; Masahisa Ohtsuka; Ryoji Nonaka; Akira Inoue; Atsushi Naito; Tae Matsumura; Mamoru Uemura; Junichi Nishimura; Ichiro Takemasa; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.