Literature DB >> 19746794

Nonlinear regression-based method for pseudoenhancement correction in CT colonography.

Baigalmaa Tsagaan1, Janne Näppi, Hiroyuki Yoshida.   

Abstract

In CT colonography (CTC), orally administered positive-contrast tagging agents are often used for differentiating residual bowel contents from native colonic structures. However, tagged materials can sometimes hyperattenuate observed CT numbers of their adjacent untagged materials. Such pseudoenhancement complicates the differentiation of colonic soft-tissue structures from tagged materials, because pseudoenhanced colonic structures may have CT numbers that are similar to those of tagged materials. The authors developed a nonlinear regression-based (NLRB) method for performing a local image-based pseudoenhancement correction of CTC data. To calibrate the correction parameters, the CT data of an anthropomorphic reference phantom were correlated with those of partially tagged phantoms. The CTC data were registered spatially by use of an adaptive multiresolution method, and untagged and tagged partial-volume soft-tissue surfaces were correlated by use of a virtual tagging scheme. The NLRB method was then optimized to minimize the difference in the CT numbers of soft-tissue regions between the untagged and tagged phantom CTC data by use of the Nelder-Mead downhill simplex method. To validate the method, the CT numbers of untagged regions were compared with those of registered pseudoenhanced phantom regions before and after the correction. The CT numbers were significantly different before performing the correction (p<0.01), whereas, after the correction, the difference between the CT numbers was not significant. The effect of the correction was also tested on the size measurement of polyps that were covered by tagging in phantoms and in clinical cases. In phantom cases, before the correction, the diameters of 12 simulated polyps submerged in tagged fluids that were measured in a soft-tissue CT display were significantly different from those measured in an untagged phantom (p<0.01), whereas after the correction the difference was not significant. In clinical cases, before the correction, the diameters of 29 colonoscopy-confirmed 3-14 mm polyps affected by tagging that were measured in a soft-tissue CT display were significantly different from those measured in a lung CT display (p<0.0001) or in colonoscopy (p<0.05), whereas after the correction the difference was not significant. Finally, the effect of the correction was tested on automated detection of 25 polyps > or =6 mm affected by tagging in 56 clinical CTC cases. The application of the correction increased the detection accuracy from 60% with 5.0 FP detections per patient without correction to 96% with 2.9 FP detections with correction. This improvement in detection accuracy was statistically significant (p<0.05). The results indicate that the proposed NLRB method can yield an accurate pseudoenhancement correction with potentially significant benefits in clinical CTC examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19746794      PMCID: PMC2721763          DOI: 10.1118/1.3147201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  19 in total

1.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty; Kevin S Berbaum
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; Matthew A Barish; J Richard Choi; Abraham H Dachman; Helen M Fenlon; Joseph T Ferrucci; Seth N Glick; Andrea Laghi; Michael Macari; Elizabeth G McFarland; Martina M Morrin; Perry J Pickhardt; Jorge Soto; Judy Yee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Fully automated three-dimensional detection of polyps in fecal-tagging CT colonography.

Authors:  Janne Näppi; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography.

Authors:  Janne Näppi; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity.

Authors:  P Thévenaz; U E Ruttimann; M Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 6.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Polyp size at CT colonography after electronic subtraction cleansing in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

Authors:  Michael E Zalis; James J Perumpillichira; John Y Kim; Chiara Del Frate; Cordula Magee; Peter F Hahn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Computed tomographic colonography: automated tool for polyp measurement delivering on patient risk stratification.

Authors:  Didier Bielen; Ragna Vanslembrouck; Frederik De Keyzer; Hilde Vandenhout; Lutz Guendel; Eric Van Cutsem; Guy Marchal
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers.

Authors:  C Daniel Johnson; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Alicia Y Toledano; Jay P Heiken; Abraham Dachman; Mark D Kuo; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Amy K Hara; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; Judy Yee; Benjamin A Herman; Lawrence J Burgart; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Abraham H Dachman; Hiro Yoshida
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.303

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Improving the accuracy of CTC interpretation: computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Information-Preserving Pseudo-Enhancement Correction for Non-Cathartic Low-Dose Dual-Energy CT Colonography.

Authors:  Janne J Näppi; Rie Tachibana; Daniele Regge; Hiroyuki Yoshida
Journal:  Abdom Imaging (2014)       Date:  2014-09

4.  Electronic cleansing in computed tomography colonography using AT layer identification with integration of gradient directional second derivative and material fraction model.

Authors:  Krisorn Chunhapongpipat; Ratinan Boonklurb; Bundit Chaopathomkul; Sirod Sirisup; Rajalida Lipikorn
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.930

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.