Literature DB >> 19744509

Psychosocial predictors of adherence to risk-appropriate cervical cancer screening guidelines: a cross sectional study of women in Ohio Appalachia participating in the Community Awareness Resources and Education (CARE) project.

Electra D Paskett1, John M McLaughlin, Paul L Reiter, Amy M Lehman, Dale A Rhoda, Mira L Katz, Erinn M Hade, Douglas M Post, Mack T Ruffin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We describe factors, in the context of the Social Determinants of Health model, associated with receiving Pap smears within risk-appropriate guidelines (i.e., guidelines that specify screening intervals based upon a woman's individual risk of developing cervical cancer).
METHODS: Completed in June 2006, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of women from 14 health clinics in Ohio Appalachia pertaining to psychosocial, demographic, biological, and health-related factors. A logistic regression model was constructed to predict whether or not a woman was within risk-appropriate cervical cancer screening guidelines.
RESULTS: Of 562 women with a date of last Pap smear, 380 (68%) were within risk-appropriate guidelines. Logistic regression showed that, compared to women with low-level SES, women with middle- and high-level SES had 3.39 [1.85, 6.21] and 3.86 [2.03, 7.34] times the odds, respectively, of being within risk-appropriate guidelines. Odds of being within guidelines increased 1.09 [1.04, 1.15] fold for each decrease of one major life event. Additionally, women that were financially better off or financially worse off than their parents at the same age had lower odds (0.41 [0.23, 0.73] and 0.49 [0.24, 0.98], respectively) of being within guidelines than women who reported their finances were the same as their parents. Results also showed an interaction between marital status and age at first intercourse (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: The results suggest an impact of psychosocial factors on Pap smear testing behaviors, and illustrate the need to examine risk-appropriate interventions to improve screening. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744509      PMCID: PMC2813897          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  25 in total

1.  Factors important in promoting cervical cancer screening among Canadian women: findings from the 1996-97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS).

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider; S A Vik
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women.

Authors:  Usha Sambamoorthi; Donna D McAlpine
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Validation of the Detroit Area Study Discrimination Scale in a community sample of older African American adults: the Pittsburgh healthy heart project.

Authors:  Teletia R Taylor; Thomas W Kamarck; Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2004

4.  Predictors of compliance with recommended cervical cancer screening schedule: a population-based study.

Authors:  E J Simoes; C J Newschaffer; N Hagdrup; F Ali-Abarghoui; X Tao; N Mack; R C Brownson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1999-04

5.  A global measure of perceived stress.

Authors:  S Cohen; T Kamarck; R Mermelstein
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1983-12

6.  Cervical cancer risk as a predictor of Pap smear use in rural North Carolina.

Authors:  Mfon S Cyrus-David; Robert Michielutte; Electra D Paskett; Ralph D'Agostino; David Goff
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Depressive symptom burden as a barrier to screening for breast and cervical cancers.

Authors:  Paul A Pirraglia; Pallabi Sanyal; Daniel E Singer; Timothy G Ferris
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  The role of health insurance on Pap smear and mammography utilization by immigrants living in the United States.

Authors:  Olveen Carrasquillo; Susmita Pati
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Screening mammography and Pap tests among older American women 1996-2000: results from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) and Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD).

Authors:  Truls Ostbye; Gary N Greenberg; Donald H Taylor; Ann Marie M Lee
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Relationships between level of disability and receipt of preventive health services.

Authors:  Marguerite E Diab; Mark V Johnston
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Among US Hispanics/Latinas: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lilli Mann; Kristie L Foley; Amanda E Tanner; Christina J Sun; Scott D Rhodes
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Appalachian women's perspectives on breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Tina M Kruger; Shoshana Bardach; Britteny M Howell
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  Predictors of adherence to follow-up recommendations after an abnormal Pap smear among underserved inner-city women.

Authors:  Suzanne M Miller; Erin K Tagai; Kuang-Yi Wen; Minsun Lee; Siu-Kuen Azor Hui; Deirdre Kurtz; John Scarpato; Enrique Hernandez
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-01-31

4.  Risk factors for smoking in rural women.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Wewers; Pamela J Salsberry; Amy K Ferketich; Karen L Ahijevych; Nancy E Hood; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Inconsistencies between medical records and patient-reported recommendations for follow-up after abnormal Pap tests.

Authors:  Stacey Slone; Carol White; Brent Shelton; Emily Van Meter; Christopher DeSimone; Nancy Schoenberg; Mark Dignan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Effects of an Education Intervention about HPV Self-Testing for Healthcare Providers and Staff.

Authors:  Brynne E Presser; Mira L Katz; Abigail B Shoben; Deborah Moore; Mack T Ruffin; Electra D Paskett; Paul L Reiter
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

8.  Individual, provider, and system risk factors for breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved Black, Latina, and Arab women.

Authors:  Leeanne Roman; Cristian Meghea; Sabrina Ford; Louis Penner; Hiam Hamade; Tamika Estes; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Results of a Multilevel Intervention Trial to Increase Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Uptake among Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michael L Pennell; Cathy M Tatum; Paul L Reiter; Juan Peng; Brittany M Bernardo; Rory C Weier; Morgan S Richardson; Mira L Katz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Oral cancer screening and dental care use among women from Ohio Appalachia.

Authors:  P L Reiter; A G Wee; A Lehman; E D Paskett
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 1.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.