Literature DB >> 19743914

Physical ecology of fluid flow sensing in arthropods.

Jérôme Casas1, Olivier Dangles.   

Abstract

Terrestrial and aquatic arthropods sense fluid flow in many behavioral and ecological contexts, using dedicated, highly sensitive mechanosensory hairs, which are often abundant. Strong similarities exist in the biomechanics of flow sensors and in the sensory ecology of insects, arachnids, and crustaceans in their respective fluid environments. We extend these considerations to flow in sand and its implications for flow sensing by arthropods inhabiting this granular medium. Finally, we highlight the need to merge the various findings of studies that have focused on different arthropods in different fluids. This could be achieved using the unique combination, for sensory ecology, of both a workable and well-accepted mathematical model for hair-based flow sensing, both in air and water, and microelectronic mechanical systems microtechnology to tinker with physical models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19743914     DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN: 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  23 in total

1.  Air motion sensing hairs of arthropods detect high frequencies at near-maximal mechanical efficiency.

Authors:  Brice Bathellier; Thomas Steinmann; Friedrich G Barth; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Why do insects have such a high density of flow-sensing hairs? Insights from the hydromechanics of biomimetic MEMS sensors.

Authors:  Jérôme Casas; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The morphological heterogeneity of cricket flow-sensing hairs conveys the complex flow signature of predator attacks.

Authors:  Thomas Steinmann; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Mechanical responses of rat vibrissae to airflow.

Authors:  Yan S W Yu; Matthew M Graff; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Mechanosensory hairs in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) detect weak electric fields.

Authors:  Gregory P Sutton; Dominic Clarke; Erica L Morley; Daniel Robert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Airborne Acoustic Perception by a Jumping Spider.

Authors:  Paul S Shamble; Gil Menda; James R Golden; Eyal I Nitzany; Katherine Walden; Tsevi Beatus; Damian O Elias; Itai Cohen; Ronald N Miles; Ronald R Hoy
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Hydrodynamics affect predator controls through physical and sensory stressors.

Authors:  Jessica L Pruett; Marc J Weissburg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Whisker Vibrations and the Activity of Trigeminal Primary Afferents in Response to Airflow.

Authors:  Yan S W Yu; Nicholas E Bush; Mitra J Z Hartmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Encoding of small-scale air motion dynamics in the cricket, Acheta domesticus.

Authors:  Jonas Mulder-Rosi; John P Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Leakiness and flow capture ratio of insect pectinate antennae.

Authors:  Mourad Jaffar-Bandjee; Thomas Steinmann; Gijs Krijnen; Jérôme Casas
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.