Literature DB >> 17142421

Contribution of articular surface geometry to ankle stabilization.

Yuki Tochigi1, M James Rudert, Charles L Saltzman, Annunziato Amendola, Thomas D Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Passive ankle stability under weight-bearing conditions has been found to depend substantially on the role of the articular surface geometry. In the present study, it was hypothesized that, in the ankle under axial loading, contact-stress changes in response to alterations of external load involve reproducible and specific patterns to maintain ankle stability.
METHODS: Six cadaver ankles with the peri-ankle ligaments intact were tested. Each specimen, held at several predetermined ankle positions under a primary one-body-weight axial force, was subjected to an additional secondary load. The secondary load-specifically, anterior/posterior shear force, inversion/eversion torque, or internal/external rotation torque-was applied independently, while motion associated with the two other secondary loading directions was unconstrained. Contact stress in the tibiotalar articulation was monitored by a real-time contact-stress sensor. Site-specific stress changes solely due to secondary loading at each load/position were identified by subtraction of the corresponding axial-force-only baseline distribution. The role of these stress changes in ankle stabilization was studied for each specimen by analyzing the data with a computer model of ankle geometry.
RESULTS: In the cadaver experiment, anterior and posterior shear forces caused reproducible positive changes in articular contact stresses on the anterior and posterior regions, respectively. Similar changes with version torques occurred on the medial and lateral regions. Positive changes with internal/external rotation torques occurred at two diagonal locations: anterolateral and posteromedial, or anteromedial and posterolateral. In the model analysis, these stress-change patterns were found to be effective in ankle stabilization, and the levels of contribution by the articular surface were calculated as accounting for approximately 70% of anterior/posterior stability, 50% of version stability, and 30% of internal/external rotation stability.
CONCLUSIONS: The documented changes in contact stress illustrate the major role of articular geometry in passive ankle stabilization. The levels of contribution by the articular surface that we calculated are consistent with those reported in the literature. These findings support the conceptual mechanism of ankle stabilization by redistribution of articular contact stress.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17142421     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  18 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Lateral ligament repair and reconstruction restore neither contact mechanics of the ankle joint nor motion patterns of the hindfoot.

Authors:  Victor R Prisk; Carl W Imhauser; Padhraig F O'Loughlin; John G Kennedy
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Compliance-dependent load allocation between sensing versus non-sensing portions of a sheet-array contact stress sensor.

Authors:  Jordan M Hartmann; M James Rudert; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas E Baer; Curtis M Goreham-Voss; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

Review 4.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  A new sensor for measurement of dynamic contact stress in the hip.

Authors:  M J Rudert; B J Ellis; C R Henak; N J Stroud; D R Pederson; J A Weiss; T D Brown
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  How Do Hindfoot Fusions Affect Ankle Biomechanics: A Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Ian D Hutchinson; Josh R Baxter; Susannah Gilbert; MaCalus V Hogan; Jeff Ling; Stuart M Saunders; Hongsheng Wang; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: A distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches.

Authors:  Michelle L Delco; John G Kennedy; Lawrence J Bonassar; Lisa A Fortier
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Effect of implantation accuracy on ankle contact mechanics with a metallic focal resurfacing implant.

Authors:  Donald D Anderson; Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Tanawat Vaseenon; Thomas D Brown; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of chronic contact stress exposure after intraarticular fracture of the tibial plafond.

Authors:  Wendy Li; Donald D Anderson; Jane K Goldsworthy; J Lawrence Marsh; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Correlation of dynamic cartilage contact stress aberrations with severity of instability in ankle incongruity.

Authors:  Yuki Tochigi; M James Rudert; Todd O McKinley; Douglas R Pedersen; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.