Literature DB >> 19741542

Recalibration and validation of the SCORE risk chart in the Australian population: the AusSCORE chart.

Lei Chen1, Andrew M Tonkin, Lynelle Moon, Paul Mitchell, Annette Dobson, Graham Giles, Michael Hobbs, Patrick J Phillips, Jonathan E Shaw, David Simmons, Leon A Simons, Anthony P Fitzgerald, Guy De Backer, Dirk De Bacquer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Development of a validated risk prediction model for future cardiovascular disease (CVD) in Australians is a high priority for cardiovascular health strategies.
DESIGN: Recalibration of the SCORE (Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation) risk chart based on Australian national mortality data and average major CVD risk factor levels.
METHODS: Australian national mortality data (2003-2005) were used to estimate 10-year cumulative CVD mortality rates for people aged 40-74 years. Average age-specific and sex-specific levels of systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and prevalence of current smoking were generated from data obtained in eight Australian large-scale population-based surveys undertaken from the late 1980s. The SCORE risk chart was then recalibrated by applying hazard ratios for 10-year CVD mortality obtained in the SCORE project. Discrimination and calibration of the recalibrated model was evaluated and compared with that of the original SCORE and Framingham equations in the Blue Mountains Eye Study in Australia using Harrell's c and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi statistics, respectively.
RESULTS: An Australian risk prediction chart for CVD mortality was derived. Among 1998 Blue Mountains Eye Study participants aged 49-74 years with neither CVD nor diabetes at baseline, the Harrell's c statistics for the Australian risk prediction chart for CVD mortality were 0.76 (95% confidence interval: 0.69-0.84) and 0.71 (confidence interval: 0.62-0.80) in men and women, respectively. The corresponding Hosmer-Lemeshow chi statistics, the measure of calibration, were 2.32 (P = 0.68) and 7.43 (P = 0.11), which were superior to both the SCORE and Framingham equations.
CONCLUSION: This new tool provides a valid and reliable method to predict risk of CVD mortality in the general Australian population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19741542     DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32832cd9cb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN: 1741-8267


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular risk assessment: a global perspective.

Authors:  Dong Zhao; Jing Liu; Wuxiang Xie; Yue Qi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The Next Generation of Clinical Decision Making Tools: Development of a Real-Time Prediction Tool for Outcome of Prostate Biopsy in Response to a Continuously Evolving Prostate Cancer Landscape.

Authors:  Andreas N Strobl; Ian M Thompson; Andrew J Vickers; Donna P Ankerst
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Refitting of the UKPDS 68 risk equations to contemporary routine clinical practice data in the UK.

Authors:  P McEwan; H Bennett; T Ward; K Bergenheim
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Laboratory-based and office-based risk scores and charts to predict 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in 182 countries: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts and health surveys.

Authors:  Peter Ueda; Mark Woodward; Yuan Lu; Kaveh Hajifathalian; Rihab Al-Wotayan; Carlos A Aguilar-Salinas; Alireza Ahmadvand; Fereidoun Azizi; James Bentham; Renata Cifkova; Mariachiara Di Cesare; Louise Eriksen; Farshad Farzadfar; Trevor S Ferguson; Nayu Ikeda; Davood Khalili; Young-Ho Khang; Vera Lanska; Luz León-Muñoz; Dianna J Magliano; Paula Margozzini; Kelias P Msyamboza; Gerald Mutungi; Kyungwon Oh; Sophal Oum; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Rosalba Rojas-Martinez; Gonzalo Valdivia; Rainford Wilks; Jonathan E Shaw; Gretchen A Stevens; Janne S Tolstrup; Bin Zhou; Joshua A Salomon; Majid Ezzati; Goodarz Danaei
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  Independent external validation of cardiovascular disease mortality in women utilising Framingham and SCORE risk models: a mortality follow-up study.

Authors:  Louise Gek Huang Goh; Timothy Alexander Welborn; Satvinder Singh Dhaliwal
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Algorithm for predicting CHD death risk in Turkish adults: conventional factors contribute only moderately in women.

Authors:  Altan Onat; Günay Can; Ayşem Kaya; Muhammed Keskin; Mert I Hayıroğlu; Hüsniye Yüksel
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.596

7.  Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Krzysztof Studziński; Tomasz Tomasik; Janusz Krzyszton; Jacek Jóźwiak; Adam Windak
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Impact of behavioural risk factors on death within 10 years for women and men in their 70s: absolute risk charts.

Authors:  Annette Dobson; Deirdre McLaughlin; Osvaldo Almeida; Wendy Brown; Julie Byles; Leon Flicker; Janni Leung; Derrick Lopez; Kieran McCaul; Graeme J Hankey
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Short-term predictive ability of selected cardiovascular risk prediction models in a rural Bangladeshi population: a case-cohort study.

Authors:  Kaniz Fatema; Bayzidur Rahman; Nicholas Arnold Zwar; Abul Hasnat Milton; Liaquat Ali
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  Re-calibration of coronary risk prediction: an example of the Seven Countries Study.

Authors:  Paolo Emilio Puddu; Paolo Piras; Daan Kromhout; Hanna Tolonen; Anthony Kafatos; Alessandro Menotti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.