PURPOSE: Development of a radiosensitivity predictive assay is a central goal of radiation oncology. We reasoned a gene expression model could be developed to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity and treatment response in patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiosensitivity (determined by survival fraction at 2 Gy) was modeled as a function of gene expression, tissue of origin, ras status (mut/wt), and p53 status (mut/wt) in 48 human cancer cell lines. Ten genes were identified and used to build a rank-based linear regression algorithm to predict an intrinsic radiosensitivity index (RSI, high index = radioresistance). This model was applied to three independent cohorts treated with concurrent chemoradiation: head-and-neck cancer (HNC, n = 92); rectal cancer (n = 14); and esophageal cancer (n = 12). RESULTS: Predicted RSI was significantly different in responders (R) vs. nonresponders (NR) in the rectal (RSI R vs. NR 0.32 vs. 0.46, p = 0.03), esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.37 vs. 0.50, p = 0.05) and combined rectal/esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.34 vs. 0.48, p = 0.001511) cohorts. Using a threshold RSI of 0.46, the model has a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82%, and positive predictive value of 86%. Finally, we evaluated the model as a prognostic marker in HNC. There was an improved 2-year locoregional control (LRC) in the predicted radiosensitive group (2-year LRC 86% vs. 61%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We validate a robust multigene expression model of intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity in three independent cohorts totaling 118 patients. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a systems biology-based radiosensitivity model is validated in multiple independent clinical datasets.
PURPOSE: Development of a radiosensitivity predictive assay is a central goal of radiation oncology. We reasoned a gene expression model could be developed to predict intrinsic radiosensitivity and treatment response in patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Radiosensitivity (determined by survival fraction at 2 Gy) was modeled as a function of gene expression, tissue of origin, ras status (mut/wt), and p53 status (mut/wt) in 48 humancancer cell lines. Ten genes were identified and used to build a rank-based linear regression algorithm to predict an intrinsic radiosensitivity index (RSI, high index = radioresistance). This model was applied to three independent cohorts treated with concurrent chemoradiation: head-and-neck cancer (HNC, n = 92); rectal cancer (n = 14); and esophageal cancer (n = 12). RESULTS: Predicted RSI was significantly different in responders (R) vs. nonresponders (NR) in the rectal (RSI R vs. NR 0.32 vs. 0.46, p = 0.03), esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.37 vs. 0.50, p = 0.05) and combined rectal/esophageal (RSI R vs. NR 0.34 vs. 0.48, p = 0.001511) cohorts. Using a threshold RSI of 0.46, the model has a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 82%, and positive predictive value of 86%. Finally, we evaluated the model as a prognostic marker in HNC. There was an improved 2-year locoregional control (LRC) in the predicted radiosensitive group (2-year LRC 86% vs. 61%, p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We validate a robust multigene expression model of intrinsic tumor radiosensitivity in three independent cohorts totaling 118 patients. To our knowledge, this is the first time that a systems biology-based radiosensitivity model is validated in multiple independent clinical datasets.
Authors: G I Terzoudi; T Jung; J Hain; J Vrouvas; K Margaritis; C Donta-Bakoyianni; V Makropoulos; P Angelakis; G E Pantelias Journal: Int J Radiat Biol Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 2.694
Authors: J E Staunton; D K Slonim; H A Coller; P Tamayo; M J Angelo; J Park; U Scherf; J K Lee; W O Reinhold; J N Weinstein; J P Mesirov; E S Lander; T R Golub Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-09-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura J van 't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Augustinus A M Hart; Mao Mao; Hans L Peterse; Karin van der Kooy; Matthew J Marton; Anke T Witteveen; George J Schreiber; Ron M Kerkhoven; Chris Roberts; Peter S Linsley; René Bernards; Stephen H Friend Journal: Nature Date: 2002-01-31 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: N A Janjan; C Crane; B W Feig; K Cleary; R Dubrow; S Curley; J N Vauthey; P Lynch; L M Ellis; R Wolff; R Lenzi; J Abbruzzese; R Pazdur; P M Hoff; P Allen; T Brown; J Skibber Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: M J Zelefsky; Z Fuks; M Hunt; H J Lee; D Lombardi; C C Ling; V E Reuter; E S Venkatraman; S A Leibel Journal: J Urol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; William J Fulp; Anders E Berglund; Sarah E Hoffe; Thomas J Dilling; Steven A Eschrich; Ravi Shridhar; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Tobin Strom; Javier F Torres-Roca; Akash Parekh; Arash O Naghavi; Jimmy J Caudell; Daniel E Oliver; Jane L Messina; Nikhil I Khushalani; Jonathan S Zager; Amod Sarnaik; James J Mulé; Andy M Trotti; Steven A Eschrich; Vernon K Sondak; Louis B Harrison Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Melanie Spitzner; Georg Emons; Frank Kramer; Jochen Gaedcke; Margret Rave-Fränk; Jens-Gerd Scharf; Peter Burfeind; Heinz Becker; Tim Beissbarth; B Michael Ghadimi; Thomas Ried; Marian Grade Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Lei Huang; Odile David; Robert J Cabay; Klara Valyi-Nagy; Virgilia Macias; Rong Zhong; Barry Wenig; Lawrence Feldman; Ralph Weichselbaum; Michael T Spiotto Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-12-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tobin Strom; Louis B Harrison; Anna R Giuliano; Michael J Schell; Steven A Eschrich; Anders Berglund; William Fulp; Ram Thapa; Domenico Coppola; Sungjune Kim; Jessica Frakes; John Foekens; James J Mulé; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 9.162