OBJECTIVES: K103N, the most common nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant mutation in patients with transmitted resistance and in patients receiving a failing NNRTI-containing regimen, is fully susceptible to the new NNRTI, etravirine. Therefore, we sought to determine how often NNRTI-resistant mutations other than K103N occur as minority variants in plasma samples for which standard genotypic resistance testing detects K103N alone. METHODS: We performed ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS; 454 Life Sciences a Roche Company, Branford, CT) of plasma virus samples from 13 treatment-naive and 20 NNRTI-experienced patients in whom standard genotypic resistance testing revealed K103N but no other major NNRTI-resistance mutations. RESULTS: Samples from 0 of 13 treatment-naive patients vs. 7 of 20 patients failing an NNRTI-containing regimen had minority variants with major etravirine-associated NNRTI-resistant mutations (P = 0.03, Fisher exact test): Y181C (7.0%), Y181C (3.6%) + G190A (3.2%), L100I (14%), L100I (32%) + 190A (5.4%), K101E (3.8%) + G190A (4.9%), K101E (4.0%) + G190S (4.8%), and G190S (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naive patients, UDPS did not detect additional major NNRTI-resistant mutations suggesting that etravirine may be effective in patients with transmitted K103N. In NNRTI-experienced patients, UDPS often detected additional major NNRTI-resistant mutations suggesting that etravirine may not be fully active in patients with acquired K103N.
OBJECTIVES:K103N, the most common nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-resistant mutation in patients with transmitted resistance and in patients receiving a failing NNRTI-containing regimen, is fully susceptible to the new NNRTI, etravirine. Therefore, we sought to determine how often NNRTI-resistant mutations other than K103N occur as minority variants in plasma samples for which standard genotypic resistance testing detects K103N alone. METHODS: We performed ultradeep pyrosequencing (UDPS; 454 Life Sciences a Roche Company, Branford, CT) of plasma virus samples from 13 treatment-naive and 20 NNRTI-experienced patients in whom standard genotypic resistance testing revealed K103N but no other major NNRTI-resistance mutations. RESULTS: Samples from 0 of 13 treatment-naive patients vs. 7 of 20 patients failing an NNRTI-containing regimen had minority variants with major etravirine-associated NNRTI-resistant mutations (P = 0.03, Fisher exact test): Y181C (7.0%), Y181C (3.6%) + G190A (3.2%), L100I (14%), L100I (32%) + 190A (5.4%), K101E (3.8%) + G190A (4.9%), K101E (4.0%) + G190S (4.8%), and G190S (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naive patients, UDPS did not detect additional major NNRTI-resistant mutations suggesting that etravirine may be effective in patients with transmitted K103N. In NNRTI-experienced patients, UDPS often detected additional major NNRTI-resistant mutations suggesting that etravirine may not be fully active in patients with acquired K103N.
Authors: N S Shulman; A R Zolopa; D J Passaro; U Murlidharan; D M Israelski; C L Brosgart; M D Miller; S Van Doren; R W Shafer; D A Katzenstein Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2000-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jose L Casado; Ana Moreno; Kurt Hertogs; Fernando Dronda; Santiago Moreno Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2002-07-20 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: L T Bacheler; E D Anton; P Kudish; D Baker; J Bunville; K Krakowski; L Bolling; M Aujay; X V Wang; D Ellis; M F Becker; A L Lasut; H J George; D R Spalding; G Hollis; K Abremski Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: S H Eshleman; G Becker-Pergola; M Deseyve; L A Guay; M Mracna; T Fleming; S Cunningham; P Musoke; F Mmiro; J B Jackson Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2001-08-13 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: L Bacheler; S Jeffrey; G Hanna; R D'Aquila; L Wallace; K Logue; B Cordova; K Hertogs; B Larder; R Buckery; D Baker; K Gallagher; H Scarnati; R Tritch; C Rizzo Journal: J Virol Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: R W Shafer; K Hertogs; A R Zolopa; A Warford; S Bloor; B J Betts; T C Merigan; R Harrigan; B A Larder Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: S H Eshleman; M Mracna; L A Guay; M Deseyve; S Cunningham; M Mirochnick; P Musoke; T Fleming; M Glenn Fowler; L M Mofenson; F Mmiro; J B Jackson Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-10-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Sara Gianella; Wayne Delport; Mary E Pacold; Jason A Young; Jun Yong Choi; Susan J Little; Douglas D Richman; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Davey M Smith Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Benjamin J Burwitz; Zachary Ende; Benjamin Sudolcan; Matthew R Reynolds; Justin M Greene; Benjamin N Bimber; Jorge R Almeida; Monica Kurniawan; Vanessa Venturi; Emma Gostick; Roger W Wiseman; Daniel C Douek; David A Price; David H O'Connor Journal: J Virol Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Cassandra B Jabara; Corbin D Jones; Jeffrey Roach; Jeffrey A Anderson; Ronald Swanstrom Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eugene L Asahchop; Mark A Wainberg; Richard D Sloan; Cécile L Tremblay Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Paul Hughes; Wenjie Deng; Scott C Olson; Robert W Coombs; Michael H Chung; Lisa M Frenkel Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Malaya K Sahoo; Martina I Lefterova; Fumiko Yamamoto; Jesse J Waggoner; Sunwen Chou; Susan P Holmes; Matthew W Anderson; Benjamin A Pinsky Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-08-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Charlotte Hedskog; Mattias Mild; Johanna Jernberg; Ellen Sherwood; Göran Bratt; Thomas Leitner; Joakim Lundeberg; Björn Andersson; Jan Albert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240