BACKGROUND: The dynamics of raltegravir-resistant variants and their impact on virologic response in 23 HIV-1-infected patients, who started a salvage raltegravir-containing regimen, were investigated. METHODS: Integrase population sequencing and Ultra-Deep-454 Pyrosequencing (UDPS) were performed on plasma samples at baseline and at raltegravir failure. All integrase mutations detected at a frequency ≥1% were considered to be reliable for the UDPS analyses. Phylogenetic and phenotypic resistance analyses were also performed. RESULTS: At baseline, primary resistance mutations were not detected by both population and UDPS genotypic assays; few secondary mutations (T97A-V151I-G163R) were rarely detected and did not show any statistically association either with virologic response at 24-weeks or with the development of resistant variants at failure. At UDPS, not all resistant variants appearing early during treatment evolved as major populations during failure; only specific resistance pathways (Y143R-Q148H/R-N155H) associated with an increased rate of fitness and phenotypic resistance were selected. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to raltegravir in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive patients remains today a rare event, which might be changed by future extensive use of such drugs. In our study, pathways of resistance at failure were not predicted by baseline mutations, suggesting that evolution plus stochastic selection plays a major role in the appearance of integrase-resistance mutations, whereas fitness and resistance are dominant factors acting for the late selection of resistant quasispecies.
BACKGROUND: The dynamics of raltegravir-resistant variants and their impact on virologic response in 23 HIV-1-infectedpatients, who started a salvage raltegravir-containing regimen, were investigated. METHODS: Integrase population sequencing and Ultra-Deep-454 Pyrosequencing (UDPS) were performed on plasma samples at baseline and at raltegravir failure. All integrase mutations detected at a frequency ≥1% were considered to be reliable for the UDPS analyses. Phylogenetic and phenotypic resistance analyses were also performed. RESULTS: At baseline, primary resistance mutations were not detected by both population and UDPS genotypic assays; few secondary mutations (T97A-V151I-G163R) were rarely detected and did not show any statistically association either with virologic response at 24-weeks or with the development of resistant variants at failure. At UDPS, not all resistant variants appearing early during treatment evolved as major populations during failure; only specific resistance pathways (Y143R-Q148H/R-N155H) associated with an increased rate of fitness and phenotypic resistance were selected. CONCLUSIONS: Resistance to raltegravir in integrase strand transfer inhibitor-naive patients remains today a rare event, which might be changed by future extensive use of such drugs. In our study, pathways of resistance at failure were not predicted by baseline mutations, suggesting that evolution plus stochastic selection plays a major role in the appearance of integrase-resistance mutations, whereas fitness and resistance are dominant factors acting for the late selection of resistant quasispecies.
Authors: Anna Maria Geretti; Zoe V Fox; Clare L Booth; Colette J Smith; Andrew N Phillips; Margaret Johnson; Jin-Fen Li; Walid Heneine; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Ina Vandenbroucke; Herwig Van Marck; Wendy Mostmans; Veerle Van Eygen; Evelien Rondelez; Kim Thys; Kurt Van Baelen; Katrien Fransen; Dolores Vaira; Kabamba Kabeya; Stephane De Wit; Eric Florence; Michel Moutschen; Linos Vandekerckhove; Chris Verhofstede; Lieven J Stuyver Journal: AIDS Res Ther Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Max Lataillade; Jennifer Chiarella; Rong Yang; Steven Schnittman; Victoria Wirtz; Jonathan Uy; Daniel Seekins; Mark Krystal; Marco Mancini; Donnie McGrath; Birgitte Simen; Michael Egholm; Michael Kozal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Martin Markowitz; Bach-Yen Nguyen; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Fernando Mendo; Winai Ratanasuwan; Colin Kovacs; Guillermo Prada; Javier O Morales-Ramirez; Clyde S Crumpacker; Robin D Isaacs; Lucinda R Gilde; Hong Wan; Michael D Miller; Larissa A Wenning; Hedy Teppler Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Poornima Parameswaran; Roxana Jalili; Li Tao; Shadi Shokralla; Baback Gharizadeh; Mostafa Ronaghi; Andrew Z Fire Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2007-10-11 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Annemarie M Wensing; Vincent Calvez; Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein; Charlotte Charpentier; Huldrych F Günthard; Roger Paredes; Robert W Shafer; Douglas D Richman Journal: Top Antivir Med Date: 2019-09
Authors: Gustavo H Kijak; Eric Sanders-Buell; Elizabeth A Harbolick; Phuc Pham; Agnes L Chenine; Leigh Anne Eller; Kathleen Rono; Merlin L Robb; Nelson L Michael; Jerome H Kim; Sodsai Tovanabutra Journal: J Virol Methods Date: 2014-05-04 Impact factor: 2.014
Authors: Kwok-Hung Chan; Kelvin K W To; Betsy W K Chan; Clara P Y Li; Susan S Chiu; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Pak-Leung Ho Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 5.948