| Literature DB >> 19732434 |
Carole Kerdelhué1, Lorenzo Zane, Mauro Simonato, Paola Salvato, Jérôme Rousselet, Alain Roques, Andrea Battisti.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quaternary climatic oscillations had dramatic effects on species evolution. In northern latitudes, populations had to survive the coldest periods in refugial areas and recurrently colonized northern regions during interglacials. Such a history usually results in a loss of genetic diversity. Populations that did not experience glaciations, in contrast, probably maintained most of their ancestral genetic diversity. These characteristics dramatically affected the present-day distribution of genetic diversity and may influence the ability of species to cope with the current global changes. We conducted a range-wide study of mitochondrial genetic diversity in the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pityocampa/T. wilkinsoni complex, Notodontidae), a forest pest occurring around the Mediterranean Basin and in southern Europe. This species is responding to the current climate change by rapid natural range expansion and can also be accidentally transported by humans. Our aim was to assess if Quaternary climatic oscillations had a different effect across the species' range and to determine if genetic footprints of contemporary processes can be identified in areas of recent introduction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19732434 PMCID: PMC2753568 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Ranges of the pine processionary moths indicating the occurrence of native . Thaumetopoea pityocampa, solid line; Thaumetopoea wilkinsoni, dashed line; A = Pinus pinea, B = P. brutia, H = P. halepensis, M = P. mugo, N = P. nigra, P = P. pinaster, S = P. sylvestris. Each letter refers to a land unit where the indicated pine species is dominant but not necessarily exclusive. Other pine species may occur in the same area. Thaumetopoea distribution was drawn from: Anonymous (1977) Pest: Thaumetopoea pityocampa (Schiff.) (Lep., Notodontidae) (Pine processionary moth). Distribution Maps of Pests, CAB, 366, 1-2. and Pinus distribution from: Richardson DM (1998) Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Figure 2Bayesian consensus tree for all Mediterranean . Bayesian supports over 0.5 are given. The arrows show the estimated age of the most recent common ancestors (in million years) of the deeper supported nodes. Age estimates and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals are given in Tables 1 & 2.
Age estimates of phylogenetic tree nodes and 95% confidence intervals.
| 7.450 | 5.776 - 9.271 | |
| 6.742 | 4.892 - 8.613 | |
| 2.348 | 1.631 - 3.124 | |
| 1.772 | 0.921 - 2.725 | |
| 3.146 | 2.104 - 4.298 | |
| 1.364 | 0.766- 2.025 | |
| 5.332 | 3.688 - 7.067 | |
| 1.846 | 1.210 - 2.545 | |
| 1.259 | 0.742 - 1.060 |
Estimations were performed by analysing all the haplotypes and assuming a Yule prior. The node codes are given in Figure 2.
Figure 3Geographical distribution of mitochondrial haplotypes of the . A. Geographical mapping of haplotypes in the sampled populations. Circles are proportional to the number of individuals analyzed in each population and colors refer to the major clades identified in network analyses. Codes of populations are given in Additional file 1. B. Haplotype network of the 'pityocampa' clade. Each line in the network represents a single mutational change. Empty circles indicate intermediate, missing haplotypes. C. Haplotype network of the 'Eastern North Africa' clade. D. Haplotype network of the 'wilkinsoni' clade.
Estimates of tMRCAs of the most recent nodes (main sub-clades) and 95% confidence intervals.
| 0.090 | 0.028 - 0.172 | Exponential* | |
| 0.091 | 0.005 - 0.201 | Constant | |
| 0.130 | 0.011 - 0.290 | Constant | |
| 0.532 | 0.194 - 0.905 | Constant | |
| --** | Constant | ||
| 0.171 | 0.026 - 0.355 | Constant | |
| 0.326 | 0.092 - 0.601 | Constant | |
| --** | Constant | ||
| 0.332 | 0.114 - 0.608 | Constant | |
| 0.417 | 0.148 - 0.711 | Constant | |
| 0.151 | 0.021 - 0.313 | Constant | |
| 0.381 | 0.116 - 0.688 | Constant | |
Estimates were obtained by assuming a coalescent prior of constant size or exponential growth and by including all the sequences of each given sub-clade. Names are the same as in Figure 2.
* Results based on an exponential prior are reported because the rate of exponential growth (g) was significantly higher than 0 for this group.
** MCMC did not converge due to small sample size (N = 10 and 6 for Corsica and Libya, respectively)
Indices of genetic diversity per identified sub-clade, Tajima's D and Fu's Fs statistics
| Corsica | 10 | 0.36 | 0.06% | 0.01 NS | 0.42 NS |
| South Algeria - South Morocco | 13 | 0.73 | 0.15% | - 0.14 NS | - 0.69 NS |
| North Morocco | 24 | 0.55 | 0.69% | 2.35 NS | 7.22 NS |
| Iberian Peninsula | 61 | 0.60 | 0.12% | 0.18 NS | 0.10 NS |
| Rest of Europe | 358 | 0.44 | 0.11% | - 1.82 ** | - 15.82 ** |
| North Algeria | 12 | 0.79 | 0.19% | - 0.54 NS | - 1.61 NS |
| Tunisia | 30 | 0.62 | 0.30% | 0.10 NS | 1.04 NS |
| Libya | 6 | - | - | - | - |
| Crete | 21 | 0.55 | 0.52% | 2.03 NS | 5.26 NS |
| Cyprus | 19 | 0.72 | 0.15% | -0.60 NS | - 1.42 NS |
| North & West Turkey | 45 | 0.68 | 0.20% | - 0.93 NS | - 0.56 NS |
| East Turkey, Lebanon, Israel | 133 | 0.51 | 0.35% | - 0.10 NS | 0.44 NS |
N: # individuals; Hd: gene diversity; π: nucleotide diversity per site. NS: non significant; **: p < 0.001. The names of the sub-clades are the same as in Figure 2.