| Literature DB >> 18234125 |
Carlos Villacorta1, Damià Jaume, Pedro Oromí, Carlos Juan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The amphipod crustacean Palmorchestia hypogaea occurs only in La Palma (Canary Islands) and is one of the few terrestrial amphipods in the world that have adapted to a strictly troglobitic life in volcanic cave habitats. A surface-dwelling closely related species (Palmorchestia epigaea) lives in the humid laurel forest on the same island. Previous studies have suggested that an ancestral littoral Orchestia species colonized the humid forests of La Palma and that subsequent drought episodes in the Canaries reduced the distribution of P. epigaea favouring the colonization of lava tubes through an adaptive shift. This was followed by dispersal via the hypogean crevicular system.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18234125 PMCID: PMC2246103 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biol ISSN: 1741-7007 Impact factor: 7.431
List of samples. List of examined species, sampling sites an their geographical positions, population codes (for La Palma localities of P. epigaea and P. hypogaea), numbers of individuals and the mtDNA haplotypes found. Haplotype diversities and their standard deviations are also shown. Tenerife, La Gomera, Gran Canaria, Fuerteventura and Lanzarote are islands of the Canarian archipelago.
| Cueva Honda de Gallegos | 28° 49' 43" N | GA | 8 | 8 | 9.81 ± 0.80 | |
| Cueva de Palmeros de Aguatavara | 28° 43' 59" N | AG | 10 | 5 | 8.44 ± 0.80 | |
| Cueva del Arenal | 28° 40' 56" N | AR | 6 | 4 | 8.00 ± 1.72 | |
| Cueva de la Machacadora | 28° 30' 30" N | MA | 13 | 12 | 9.87 ± 0.35 | |
| Cueva de los Palmeros | 28° 30' 27" N | PA | 8 | 7 | 9.29 ± 0.84 | |
| Cueva del Ratón | 28° 27' 46" N | RA | 6 | 6 | 8.00 ± 1.72 | |
| Cueva de la Buraca | 28° 47' 29" N | BU | 2 | 1 | N/A | |
| Juan Adalid | 28° 50' 21" N | JA | 8 | 7 | 9.47 ± 2.00 | |
| Andén Verde | 28° 49' 51" N | AV | 5 | 1 | N/A | |
| Barranco de los Franceses | 28° 48' 54" N | FR | 6 | 6 | 9.52 ± 0.96 | |
| Cubo de la Galga | 28° 45' 47" N | CG | 12 | 10 | 8.94 ± 0.78 | |
| Barranco de la Galga | 28° 46' 02" N | BG | 5 | 1 | N/A | |
| Zapata (Tenerife) | 28° 31' 56" N | 10 | 8 | 7.56 ± 1.30 | ||
| Teselinde (La Gomera) | 28° 11' 45" N | 3 | 3 | 1.00 ± 2.72 | ||
| Andén Verde (Gran Canaria) | 28° 02' 03" N | 2 | 2 | 1.00 ± 5.00 | ||
| Ajuí – Madre del Agua (Fuerteventura) | 28° 24' 04" N | 1 | 1 | N/A | ||
| Famara (Lanzarote) | 29° 12' 48" N | 10 | 7 | 8.00 ± 1.72 | ||
| La Laguna (Tenerife) | 28° 28' 31" N | 3 | 1 | NA |
Figure 1Satellite photograph of the island of La Palma (obtained from NASA World Wind) with sampling sites for . Codes correspond to the localities indicated in Table 1.
Figure 2mtDNA phylogenetic tree obtained by Bayesian inference analysis under a GTR + G + I model. Base frequencies A = 0.3266, C = 0.2140, G = 0.0992, T = 0.3604; rate matrix A-C = 0.5706, A-G = 7.2807, A-T = 0.3662, C-G = 0.8075, C-T = 3.8068, G-T = 1.0000; gamma shape parameter G = 0.8533; proportion of invariant sites = 0.3085. Values above nodes correspond to posterior probability values greater than 0.85. The nodes numbered were used for age dating using a relaxed clock. Phylogenetic relationships among Palmorchestia populations are shown in detail in Figure 3. The arrow indicates the node that was used as calibration point for the estimations of divergence time.
Figure 3mtDNA phylogenetic relationships obtained by Bayesian inference analysis for the . Values above nodes correspond to posterior probability values greater than 0.85. Branch colour coding in the tree shows parsimonious character optimization for habitat (blue, epigean; red, hypogean) assuming irreversibility. Bars to the right indicate the statistical parsimony mtDNA network membership, with blue bars corresponding to networks of pure P. epigaea haplotypes, red bars to networks of P. hypogaea haplotypes and the blue-red to the networks including haplotypes from both P. epigaea and P. hypogaea populations. The numbered nodes were used for age dating using a relaxed clock.
Estimation of coalescence times. Bayesian analysis and parameter estimation using a non-correlated relaxed molecular clock and dating of major clades in the trees of Figures 2 and 3 assuming a Yule tree prior and alternative coalescent population growth models. Mean and 95% HPD values are indicated in millions of years.
| Tree root | 9.86 (6.92–13.10) | 14.19 (5.44–23.99) | 14.61 (6.63–23.48) |
| Node 1 | 7.16 (5.30–9.24) | 7.88 (4.31–11.79) | 8.30 (5.2–12.09) |
| Node 2 | 4.96 (3.47–6.54) | 5.30 (2.49–8.21) | 5.84 (3.18–9.13) |
| Node 3 | 6.82 (4.65–9.10) | 6.23 (3.22–10.10) | 6.85 (3.79–10.71) |
| Node 4 | 4.31 (2.95–5.83) | 4.17 (1.89–6.64) | 4.77 (2.27–7.46) |
| Node 5 | 2.35 (1.56–3.18) | 1.99 (0.77–3.40) | 2.20 (0.88–3.54) |
| Node 6 | 1.04 (0.69–1.39) | 0.94 (0.46–1.43) | 0.89 (0.43–1.36) |
| Node 7 | 0.33 (0.21–0.47) | 0.36 (0.17–0.58) | 0.32 (0.16–0.51) |
| 0.12 (0.06–0.19) | 0.11 (0.04–0.20) | 0.10 (0.04–0.17) | |
| 0.09 (0.04–0.16) | 0.09 (0.03–0.16) | 0.08 (0.03–0.15) | |
| 0.02 (0.00–0.06) | 0.02 (0.00–0.06) | 0.01 (0.00–0.04) | |
| 0.08 (0.02–0.14) | 0.07 (0.02–0.15) | 0.07 (0.02–0.13) | |
| 0.27 (0.17–0.38) | 0.28 (0.13–0.46) | 0.25 (0.12–0.40) | |
| 0.18 (0.09–0.29) | 0.18 (0.06–0.34) | 0.17 (0.05–0.31) | |
| 0.11 (0.05–0.18) | 0.11 (0.04–0.21) | 0.10 (0.03–0.18) | |
| 0.22 (0.10–0.34) | 0.23 (0.08–0.42) | 0.21 (0.07–0.36) | |
| 0.29 (0.15–0.43) | 0.31 (0.12–0.54) | 0.28 (0.12–0.48) | |
| Tree log-normal likelihood | -6193.1 (-6192.6; -6175.3) | -6163.9 (-6181.3; -6146.4) | -6165.4 (-6184.6; -6148.4) |
| Mean substitution rate (% per million years) | 4.34 (3.18–5.54) | 4.83 (2.72–7.22) | 4.68 (2.91–6.73) |
AMOVA analyses. Regional structure of Palmorchestia populations when localities are grouped based on geography or habitat (surface or cave). Fixation indices ΦST (within populations), ΦSC (among populations within groups), ΦCT (among groups of populations in the species) and the significance levels of ΦCT are shown.
| Geography [JA, AV, FR, GA, CG, BG, GA] [AG] [AR] [MA] [PA] [RA] | |||
| Within populations | 0.556 | 8.90 | <0.01 |
| Among populations within groups | 0.799 | 11.14 | <0.01 |
| Among groups | 0.799 | 79.96 | <0.01 |
| Habitat surface/subterranean [JA, AV, FR, CG, BG] [GA, BU, AG, AR, MA, PA, RA] | |||
| Within populations | 0.902 | 9.75 | <0.01 |
| Among populations within groups | 0.889 | 78.22 | <0.01 |
| Among groups | 0.120 | 12.03 | Not significant |
Figure 4Statistical parsimony network obtained with TCS for the composite surface/subterranean northern clade. Each connecting line represents a single mutational step between any two given haplotypes. Dotted lines represent alternative ambiguous connections (loops). Black circles represent haplotypes not sampled (either extinct or not found in our sample), with the size of the circle of sampled haplotypes scaled approximately to the number of individuals possessing that haplotype. The nested design is represented by increasing levels of nested boxes, labelling the nesting level with the first number and particular clades at this level with the second one. Blue haplotypes correspond to P. epigaea (locality codes as in Table 1 and Figure 1) and red haplotypes correspond to P. hypogaea.
GeoDis analyses. Nested contingency results for clades with genetic and geographical variation within the northern network based on 10,000 permutations (CRE, contiguous range expansion; PGRE-F, past gradual range expansion followed by fragmentation).
| 3.5 | 9.00 | 0.1075 | No significance | N/A |
| 4.1 | 28.00 | 0.0000 | 1-19-2-11-12-NO | CRE |
| 4.2 | 20.91 | 0.0002 | 1-2-11-12-13-21-NO | PGRE-F |
| 5.1 | 39.00 | 0.0000 | No significance | N/A |