Literature DB >> 19732018

Effects of preoperative skin preparation on postoperative wound infection rates: a prospective study of 3 skin preparation protocols.

Brian R Swenson1, Traci L Hedrick, Rosemarie Metzger, Hugo Bonatti, Timothy L Pruett, Robert G Sawyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of different skin preparation solutions on surgical-site infection rates.
DESIGN: Three skin preparations were compared by means of a sequential implementation design. Each agent was adopted as the preferred modality for a 6-month period for all general surgery cases. Period 1 used a povidone-iodine scrub-paint combination (Betadine) with an isopropyl alcohol application between these steps, period 2 used 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep), and period 3 used iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol (DuraPrep). Surgical-site infections were tracked for 30 days as part of ongoing data collection for the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project initiative. The primary outcome was the overall rate of surgical-site infection by 6-month period performed in an intent-to-treat manner.
SETTING: Single large academic medical center. PATIENTS: All adult general surgery patients.
RESULTS: The study comprised 3,209 operations. The lowest infection rate was seen in period 3, with iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol as the preferred preparation method (3.9%, compared with 6.4% for period 1 and 7.1% for period 2; P = .002). In subgroup analysis, no difference in outcomes was seen between patients prepared with povidone-iodine scrub-paint and those prepared with iodine povacrylex in isopropyl alcohol, but patients in both these groups had significantly lower surgical-site infection rates, compared with rates for patients prepared with 2% chlorhexidine and 70% isopropyl alcohol (4.8% vs 8.2%; P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Skin preparation solution is an important factor in the prevention of surgical-site infections. Iodophor-based compounds may be superior to chlorhexidine for this purpose in general surgery patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19732018      PMCID: PMC3371364          DOI: 10.1086/605926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  20 in total

1.  The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs.

Authors:  K B Kirkland; J P Briggs; S L Trivette; W E Wilkinson; D J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections: results from the 1997-1999 INCISO surveillance.

Authors:  P Astagneau; C Rioux; F Golliot; G Brücker
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992-1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index.

Authors:  R P Gaynes; D H Culver; T C Horan; J R Edwards; C Richards; J S Tolson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Bacterial recolonization during foot surgery: a prospective randomized study of toe preparation techniques.

Authors:  R A Brooks; D Hollinghurst; W J Ribbans; M Severn
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Supplemental perioperative oxygen to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection.

Authors:  R Greif; O Akça; E P Horn; A Kurz; D I Sessler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Hospital costs and risk factors associated with complications of the ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Brian R Swenson; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Walter A Koltun
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; David L Veenstra; Benjamin A Lipsky; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solution vs alcohol-based povidone-iodine for central venous catheter care.

Authors:  Olivier Mimoz; Stéphanie Villeminey; Stéphanie Ragot; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; Leila Laksiri; Franck Petitpas; Bertrand Debaene
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-22

9.  A clinical study comparing the skin antisepsis and safety of ChloraPrep, 70% isopropyl alcohol, and 2% aqueous chlorhexidine.

Authors:  John S Hibbard; Gayle K Mulberry; Ann R Brady
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

10.  Comparison of povidone iodine and DuraPrep, an iodophor-in-isopropyl alcohol solution, for skin disinfection prior to epidural catheter insertion in parturients.

Authors:  David J Birnbach; Warner Meadows; Deborah J Stein; Odessa Murray; Daniel M Thys; Emilia M Sordillo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  39 in total

1.  Reducing surgical site infections: a review.

Authors:  David E Reichman; James A Greenberg
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Antimicrobial efficacy of preoperative skin antisepsis and clonal relationship to postantiseptic skin-and-wound flora in patients undergoing clean orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  G Daeschlein; M Napp; F Layer; S von Podewils; H Haase; R Spitzmueller; O Assadian; R Kasch; G Werner; M Jünger; P Hinz; A Ekkernkamp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Baseline measure of alcohol-based skin preparation agents before 2011 National Quality Forum recommendation in a general surgery population.

Authors:  Akkeneel Talsma; Andrzej Galecki; Carol E Chenoweth; Hyogeun Geun; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Kelly Podgorny; Sandra I Berríos-Torres; Dale W Bratzler; E Patchen Dellinger; Linda Greene; Ann-Christine Nyquist; Lisa Saiman; Deborah S Yokoe; Lisa L Maragakis; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 5.  Preoperative skin antiseptics for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery.

Authors:  Jo C Dumville; Emma McFarlane; Peggy Edwards; Allyson Lipp; Alexandra Holmes; Zhenmi Liu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 6.  Prevention and management of prosthetic joint infection in older adults.

Authors:  Emily K Shuman; Preeti N Malani
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infection: which agent is best?

Authors:  Micah L Hemani; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2009

8.  Comparison of the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate versus povidone iodine as preoperative skin preparation for the prevention of surgical site infections in clean-contaminated upper abdominal surgeries.

Authors:  Anirudh Srinivas; Lileswar Kaman; Prithivi Raj; Vikas Gautam; Divya Dahiya; Gurpreet Singh; Rajinder Singh; Bikash Medhi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Current preoperative antisepsis in neurosurgery: an example of the challenges in implementing evidence-based medicine to surgical practice.

Authors:  Sachdev Bobby; Jenkinson Michael D; Patel Hiren; Davies Benjamin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Comparative effectiveness of skin antiseptic agents in reducing surgical site infections: a report from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.

Authors:  Timo W Hakkarainen; E Patchen Dellinger; Heather L Evans; Farhood Farjah; Ellen Farrokhi; Scott R Steele; Richard Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.