Literature DB >> 19730910

Effect-related monitoring: estrogen-like substances in groundwater.

Bertram Kuch1, Frieder Kern, Jörg W Metzger, Karl Theo von der Trenck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND, AIM, AND SCOPE: Concentration monitoring as a basis for risk assessment is a valid approach only if there is an unambiguous relation between concentration and effect. In many cases, no such unambiguous relation exists, since various substances can exert the same effect with differing potencies. If some or all of these substances contributing to a biological effect are unknown, effect-related monitoring becomes indispensable. Endocrine-disrupting substances in water bodies, including the groundwater, are a prominent example of such a case. The aim of the investigations described here was to detect hormonally active substances in the groundwater downstream of obsolete landfills by using the E-screen assay and to possibly assign the biological effect to individual chemical compounds by means of instrumental analyses carried out in parallel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Grab samples of the groundwater were collected downstream from abandoned landfills and prepared by liquid/liquid extraction. The total estrogenic activity in these samples was determined in vitro by applying the E-screen assay. The human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) used in the E-screen proliferate in response to the presence of estrogenically active compounds. Expressed in concentration units of the reference substance 17beta-estradiol (E2), the test system allows the quantification of estrogenicity with a limit of detection (LOD) in the range of 0.1 ng/L. Aliquots of the samples were screened using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) in order to quantify known estrogenically active substances and to identify unknown compounds. Estrogen-positive samples were extracted at different pH values, split into acidic, neutral, and basic fractions and analyzed by GC/MS, searching for individual components that display estrogenic activity. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Estrogenic activity exceeding the LOD and the provisional benchmark of 0.5 ng E2/L was found at three out of seven abandoned waste disposal sites tested. The low concentrations of known xenoestrogens such as bisphenol-A, nonylphenols, or phthalic acid esters determined by GC/MS, however, were not sufficient to explain the detected activity. Neither natural nor synthetic hormones have caused the activity because these chemical structures are readily degradable and cannot persist in abandoned landfills for decades. The highest activity in the E-screen assay was found in the acidic fractions. Hydroxypolychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), hydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and hetero-PAHs, as well as alkylphenols could be identified as further compounds with possible hormonal activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Estrogenically active substances may occur in the groundwater below obsolete landfills, especially those that contain PCBs or waste from gasworks. These substances are not part of analytical programs routinely applied to contaminated sites and may therefore escape detection and assessment. Analyses using the E-screen assay and GC/MS in parallel have shown that the total estrogenic activity found in groundwater samples is to be ascribed to a multitude of individual compounds, some of which cannot be quantified due to lack of standard substances or assessed due to lack of a standardized procedure for determination of their estrogenic potency. By comparison with provisional guide values for estradiol (0.5 ng/L) and ethynylestradiol (0.3 ng/L), the damaging potential of the total estrogenic activity in groundwater samples can in fact be assessed, but specific remediation measures are impossible unless the hormonal activity can be attributed to individual chemical substances. RECOMMENDATIONS AND OUTLOOK: On the one hand, further analyses of samples taken from possible pollution sources should be conducted in order to characterize the extent of groundwater pollution with xenoestrogens. On the other hand, the most potent individual compounds should be identified according to their estrogenic potency. To this end, bioassay-directed fractionation and structure elucidation should be carried out with concentrated samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19730910     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-009-0234-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  29 in total

1.  Assessment of PCB estrogenicity in a human breast cancer cell line.

Authors:  J F Gierthy; K F Arcaro; M Floyd
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 2.  [Assessment of hydroxylated metabolites of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated dibenzofurans as potential estrogens by yeast two-hybrid system].

Authors:  H Kuroki; S Yonekura; S Sakoda; K Fujino; H Nakaoka; H Aramaki; N Koga; J Nishikawa; T Nishihara
Journal:  Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi       Date:  2001-05

3.  Identification of hydroxylated PCB metabolites and other phenolic halogenated pollutants in human blood plasma.

Authors:  L Hovander; T Malmberg; M Athanasiadou; I Athanassiadis; S Rahm; A Bergman; E Klasson Wehler
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Relative potencies of individual polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to induce dioxinlike and estrogenic responses in three cell lines.

Authors:  D L Villeneuve; J S Khim; K Kannan; J P Giesy
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.119

5.  Estimating the effects of 17alpha-ethinylestradiol on populations of the fathead minnow Pimephales promelas: are conventional toxicological endpoints adequate?

Authors:  Eric P M Grist; N Claire Wells; Paul Whitehouse; Geoff Brighty; Mark Crane
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening.

Authors:  P Skehan; R Storeng; D Scudiero; A Monks; J McMahon; D Vistica; J T Warren; H Bokesch; S Kenney; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  [Effect of 5 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on estrogen receptor binding in rats].

Authors:  Jianjun Yang; Muquan Yin
Journal:  Wei Sheng Yan Jiu       Date:  2002-06

8.  Collapse of a fish population after exposure to a synthetic estrogen.

Authors:  Karen A Kidd; Paul J Blanchfield; Kenneth H Mills; Vince P Palace; Robert E Evans; James M Lazorchak; Robert W Flick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  In vitro estrogenicity of polybrominated diphenyl ethers, hydroxylated PDBEs, and polybrominated bisphenol A compounds.

Authors:  I A Meerts; R J Letcher; S Hoving; G Marsh; A Bergman; J G Lemmen; B van der Burg; A Brouwer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The E-SCREEN assay as a tool to identify estrogens: an update on estrogenic environmental pollutants.

Authors:  A M Soto; C Sonnenschein; K L Chung; M F Fernandez; N Olea; F O Serrano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect directed analysis and mixture effects of estrogenic compounds in a sediment of the river Elbe.

Authors:  Sebastian Schmitt; Georg Reifferscheid; Evelyn Claus; Michael Schlüsener; Sebastian Buchinger
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Bioluminescence inhibition assay for the detection of hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Krystal Teasley Hamorsky; C Mark Ensor; Emre Dikici; Patrizia Pasini; Leonidas Bachas; Sylvia Daunert
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Hydroxylated polychlorinated biphenyls in the environment: sources, fate, and toxicities.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Tehrani; Benoit Van Aken
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Interconversion between methoxylated, hydroxylated and sulfated metabolites of PCB 3 in whole poplar plants.

Authors:  Yanlin Li; Christian M Bako; Panithi Saktrakulkla; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; Keri C Hornbuckle; Jerald L Schnoor
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Evaluation of estrogenic, antiestrogenic and genotoxic activity of nemorosone, the major compound found in brown Cuban propolis.

Authors:  Mariana S Camargo; Aline M Prieto; Flavia A Resende; Paula K Boldrin; Cassia R P Cardoso; Mariana F Fernández; José Manuel Molina-Molina; Nicolás Olea; Wagner Vilegas; Osmany Cuesta-Rubio; Eliana A Varanda
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.659

Review 6.  Advances in mass spectrometry-based post-column bioaffinity profiling of mixtures.

Authors:  Jeroen Kool; Martin Giera; Hubertus Irth; Wilfried M A Niessen
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for dibutyl phthalate in liquor.

Authors:  Hua Kuang; Liqiang Liu; Liguang Xu; Wei Ma; Lingling Guo; Libing Wang; Chuanlai Xu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Evaluation of estrogenic potential of flavonoids using a recombinant yeast strain and MCF7/BUS cell proliferation assay.

Authors:  Flávia A Resende; Ana Paula S de Oliveira; Mariana S de Camargo; Wagner Vilegas; Eliana A Varanda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.