Literature DB >> 19728118

Loss of hip bone mineral density over time is associated with spine and hip fracture incidence in osteoporotic postmenopausal women.

Olivier Bruyere1, Alfredo Roces Varela, Silvio Adami, Johann Detilleux, Véronique Rabenda, Mickael Hiligsmann, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

The objective of the study assess the relationship between bone mineral density (BMD) loss over time and fracture incidence in postmenopausal women. This is a posthoc analysis that includes women from the placebo group of two large randomized controlled trials having assessed the efficacy of a new anti-osteoporotic drug. BMD was assessed every 6 months during 3 years at the lumbar spine, the femoral neck and the total proximal femur. Vertebral fractures were assessed using a semiquantitative method. Hip fractures were based on written documentation. All patients received calcium and vitamin D. In the present study that included 1,775 patients (with complete data at baseline and after 3 years), the logistic regression analysis, adjusted for covariates, showed that 3-year change in lumbar BMD was not statistically associated with the new vertebral fractures after 3 years. However, femoral neck and total proximal femur BMD changes was statistically correlated with the incidence of new vertebral fractures (P < 0.001). When considering change in BMD after the first year of follow-up, a decrease in total proximal femur BMD was statistically associated with an increase in the incidence of new vertebral fractures during the last 2 years of follow-up (P = 0.048). The 3-year change in femoral neck and total proximal BMD was statistically correlated with the incidence of hip and fragility fracture after 3 years (all P < 0.001). In this elderly osteoporotic population receiving calcium and vitamin D, a decrease in hip BMD after 1 or 3 year of follow-up, is associated with an increased risk of fracture incidence. However, spine BMD changes do not influence vertebral fracture incidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728118     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9381-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  30 in total

1.  Trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone mineral density, and vertebral fractures in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Legrand; D Chappard; C Pascaretti; M Duquenne; S Krebs; V Rohmer; M F Basle; M Audran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Teresa A Hillier; Katie L Stone; Doug C Bauer; Joanne H Rizzo; Kathryn L Pedula; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Marc C Hochberg; Steve R Cummings
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-01-22

3.  Change in lumbar spine BMD and vertebral fracture risk reduction in teriparatide-treated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Peiqi Chen; Paul D Miller; Pierre D Delmas; Derek A Misurski; John H Krege
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy.

Authors:  Somnath Sarkar; Bruce H Mitlak; Mayme Wong; John L Stock; Dennis M Black; Kristine D Harper
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Changes in bone density and turnover explain the reductions in incidence of nonvertebral fractures that occur during treatment with antiresorptive agents.

Authors:  Marc C Hochberg; Susan Greenspan; Richard D Wasnich; Paul Miller; Desmond E Thompson; Philip D Ross
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Low bone mass and fast rate of bone loss at menopause: equal risk factors for future fracture: a 15-year follow-up study.

Authors:  B J Riis; M A Hansen; A M Jensen; K Overgaard; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Association between change in BMD and fragility fracture in women and men.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; David A Hanley; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; David Goltzman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Shanghai Changfeng Study: a community-based prospective cohort study of chronic diseases among middle-aged and elderly: objectives and design.

Authors:  Xin Gao; Albert Hofman; Yu Hu; Huandong Lin; Chouwen Zhu; Johannes Jeekel; Xuejuan Jin; Jiyao Wang; Jian Gao; Yiqing Yin; Naiqing Zhao
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Change in hip bone mineral density and risk of subsequent fractures in older men.

Authors:  Peggy M Cawthon; Susan K Ewing; Dawn C Mackey; Howard A Fink; Steven R Cummings; Kristine E Ensrud; Marcia L Stefanick; Doug C Bauer; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Can Hip Fracture Prediction in Women be Estimated beyond Bone Mineral Density Measurement Alone?

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Tineke van Geel; Joop van den Bergh
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 4.  Current and future treatment options in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Linda Brewer; David Williams; Alan Moore
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  New studies, technology, and the progress of epidemiology.

Authors:  Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  The Generation R Study: design and cohort update 2010.

Authors:  Vincent W V Jaddoe; Cock M van Duijn; Albert J van der Heijden; Johan P Mackenbach; Henriëtte A Moll; Eric A P Steegers; Henning Tiemeier; Andre G Uitterlinden; Frank C Verhulst; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 7.  Non-pharmacological management of osteoporosis: a consensus of the Belgian Bone Club.

Authors:  J-J Body; P Bergmann; S Boonen; Y Boutsen; O Bruyere; J-P Devogelaer; S Goemaere; N Hollevoet; J-M Kaufman; K Milisen; S Rozenberg; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  The Rotterdam Study: 2012 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; M Arfan Ikram; Harry L A Janssen; Caroline C W Klaver; Ernst J Kuipers; Tamar E C Nijsten; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Jacqueline C M Witteman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 8.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.