Literature DB >> 19728054

Rural-urban differences in colorectal cancer screening capacity in Arizona.

Jose G Benuzillo1, Elizabeth T Jacobs, Richard M Hoffman, Russell I Heigh, Peter Lance, María Elena Martínez.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer can be prevented via screening by the detection and removal of colorectal adenomas. Few data exist on screening capacity by rural/urban areas. Therefore, the aims of this work were to evaluate current colorectal cancer endoscopy screening capacity and to estimate potential volume for rural and urban regions in Arizona. Gastroenterologists and colorectal surgeons practicing in Arizona completed a survey (n = 105) that assessed current colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy screening and estimated future capacity. Resources needed to increase capacity were identified, and differences between rural and urban regions were examined. Responders were more likely to practice in an urban region (89.5%). Physicians reported performing 8,717 endoscopic procedures weekly (8,312 in urban and 405 in rural regions) and the vast majority were colonoscopies (91% in urban and 97% in rural regions). Urban physicians estimated being able to increase their capacity by 35.7% (95% confidence interval 34.7-35.7) whereas rural physicians estimated an increase of 53.1% (95% confidence interval 48.1-58.0). The most commonly cited resource needed to increase capacity was a greater number of physicians in urban regions (52.1%); while the top response in rural areas was appropriate compensation (54.6%). Lastly, 27.3% of rural physicians noted they did not need additional resources to increase their capacity. In conclusion, Arizona has the ability to expand colorectal cancer screening endoscopic capacity; this potential increase was more pronounced in rural as compared to urban regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19728054     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-009-9185-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  25 in total

Review 1.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.

Authors:  S E Kellerman; J Herold
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 2.  Colonoscopy in rural communities: can family physicians perform the procedure with safe and efficacious results?

Authors:  Jeffrey K Edwards; Thomas E Norris
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

3.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Workgroup IV: public education. UICC International Workshop on Facilitating Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Oslo, Norway (29 and 30 June 2002).

Authors:  R Hiatt; J Wardle; S Vernon; J Austoker; L Bistanti; S Fox; R Gnauck; D Iverson; M Mandelson; D Reading; R Smith
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Colonoscopy demand and capacity in New Hampshire.

Authors:  Lynn Butterly; Christopher Olenec; Martha Goodrich; Patricia Carney; Allen Dietrich
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Defining urban and rural areas in U.S. epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Susan A Hall; Jay S Kaufman; Thomas C Ricketts
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

7.  Outpatient colonoscopy by rural family physicians.

Authors:  Robert J Newman; David B Nichols; Doyle M Cummings
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in Texas 1990-1992: a comparison of rural classifications.

Authors:  Sarah Tropman Hawley; Shine Chang; David Risser; Qing Zhang
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Colorectal cancer detection in a rural community. Development of a colonoscopy screening program.

Authors:  Mike Cotterill; Rudy Gasparelli; Erle Kirby
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Vikram Boolchand; Gregory Olds; Joseph Singh; Pankaj Singh; Amitabh Chak; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  5 in total

1.  Physicians' colorectal cancer screening discussion and recommendation patterns.

Authors:  Jane M Zapka; Carrie N Klabunde; Neeraj K Arora; Gigi Yuan; Judith Lee Smith; Sarah C Kobrin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Disparities in endoscopy use for colorectal cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Rena Yadlapati
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Generalized Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Urban-Rural Differences in Social and Behavioral Factors for Colorectal Cancer Screening

Authors:  Ke-Sheng Wang; Xuefeng Liu; Muyiwa Ategbole; Xin Xie; Ying Liu; Chun Xu; Changchun Xie; Zhanxin Sha
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09-27

4.  Potential capacity of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Chisato Hamashima; Rei Goto
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 6.716

5.  Adherence to cancer screening guidelines and predictors of improvement among participants in the Kansas State Employee Wellness Program.

Authors:  Siu-kuen Azor Hui; Kimberly K Engelman; Theresa I Shireman; Edward F Ellerbeck
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 2.830

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.