Literature DB >> 15798037

Outpatient colonoscopy by rural family physicians.

Robert J Newman1, David B Nichols, Doyle M Cummings.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Five percent of family physicians offer colonoscopy services, either in the office or the hospital, often in rural areas that have no gastroenterologist. Two previous large series have shown the quality and safety of colonoscopy performed by family physicians. The purpose of this study was to verify these findings in an outpatient setting, as well as to obtain patient satisfaction data.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 731 colonoscopies performed between 1996 and 2001 in a rural Virginia family practice. These data included patients' age and sex, indications for the procedure, drug dosages for sedation, cecal intubation rates, pathologic findings, complications, and referral correlation findings compared with the original examination. A patient satisfaction survey was done.
RESULTS: The adenoma detection rate was 27.2% for men and 21.4% for women older than age 50 years. Six adenocarcinomas and 5 large (>2 cm) villous adenomas were detected, and the patients were referred for definitive surgical resection. A total of 29 patients (4%) were referred: 10 to colorectal surgery and 19 to gastroenterology for resection of large polyps. Correlation of findings at referral with the initial examination was excellent. Cecal intubation rates increased from 89.5% from 1996-1998 to 94.6% from 1999-2001. Minor sedation complications occurred in 5 cases (<1%), and patients responded to supportive care. A high degree of satisfaction was reported by patients, with a mean satisfaction score of 8.8 on a scale from 1 to 10.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy can be performed safely and competently by properly trained family physicians in an outpatient setting with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15798037      PMCID: PMC1466847          DOI: 10.1370/afm.268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  17 in total

1.  Feasibility of colonoscopy screening: discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation.

Authors:  D K Rex; D A Lieberman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John H Bond; Sidney Winawer; Theodore R Levin; Randall W Burt; David A Johnson; Lynne M Kirk; Scott Litlin; David A Lieberman; Jerome D Waye; James Church; John B Marshall; Robert H Riddell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 3.  Training and competence in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  M L Freeman
Journal:  Rev Gastroenterol Disord       Date:  2001

4.  Colonoscopy experience at a family practice residency: a comparison to gastroenterology and general surgery services.

Authors:  M B Harper; J B Pope; E J Mayeaux; T J Davis; A Myers; A Lirette
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 5.  Will virtual reality simulators end the credentialing arms race in gastrointestinal endoscopy or the need for family physician faculty with endoscopic skills?

Authors:  W M Rodney
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec

6.  Advancing from flexible sigmoidoscopy to colonoscopy in rural family practice.

Authors:  K W Carr; J M Worthington; W M Rodney; S Gentry; A Sellers; J Sizemore
Journal:  Tenn Med       Date:  1998-01

7.  Colonoscopy by a family physician: a 9-year experience of 1048 procedures.

Authors:  W Hopper; K A Kyker; W M Rodney
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  Colonoscopy performed by a family physician. A case series of 751 procedures.

Authors:  R P Pierzchajlo; R J Ackermann; R L Vogel
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 0.493

9.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.

Authors:  D K Rex; C S Cutler; G T Lemmel; E Y Rahmani; D W Clark; D J Helper; G A Lehman; D G Mark
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.

Authors:  Peter B Cotton; Patrick Connor; Daniel McGee; Paul Jowell; Nick Nickl; Steve Schutz; Joseph Leung; John Lee; Eric Libby
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  7 in total

1.  Who Performs Colonoscopy? Workforce Trends Over Space and Time.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Michele J Josey; Lee R Mobley; Davidson O Nicholas; Donna B Jeffe; Cassie Odahowski; Janice C Probst; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Improving colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Lynn Happel
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Outcomes of 1949 endoscopic procedures: performed by a Canadian rural family physician.

Authors:  Michael Kolber; Olga Szafran; Juhee Suwal; Mark Diaz
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Screening colonoscopies by primary care physicians: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Bruce LeClair; Mark Smolkin; Kathy Davies; Andria Thomas; Marcia L Taylor; Scott Strayer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Rural-urban differences in colorectal cancer screening capacity in Arizona.

Authors:  Jose G Benuzillo; Elizabeth T Jacobs; Richard M Hoffman; Russell I Heigh; Peter Lance; María Elena Martínez
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-12

7.  Prospective Study of the Quality of Colonoscopies Performed by Primary Care Physicians: The Alberta Primary Care Endoscopy (APC-Endo) Study.

Authors:  Michael R Kolber; Clarence K W Wong; Richard N Fedorak; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.