Literature DB >> 19727996

High survival of uncemented proximally porous-coated titanium alloy femoral stems in osteoporotic bone.

John B Meding1, Matthew R Galley, Merrill A Ritter.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Because the initial fixation of an uncemented stem may be compromised in patients with osteoporotic bone (Class C, Dorr et al.), many surgeons prefer a cemented stem in this setting. We therefore determined the survival of an uncemented, proximally porous-coated, straight-stemmed, titanium alloy femoral component in patients with Class C bone when compared with Class A and B bone. We implanted proximally plasma-sprayed, straight-stemmed titanium alloy stems in 1994 patients (2321 hips). Of these, 625 hips (27%), 1569 hips (67%), and 127 hips (6%) were classified as Classes A, B, and C, respectively. Minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 5.9 years; range, 2-19.5 years). We identified no differences in Harris hip scores, pain, radiolucencies, or osteolysis among Classes A, B, and C hips. Stem survival at 5, 10, and 15 years for aseptic loosening (failure) was 100% in all patients with Class A bone; 99+% in all patients with Class B bone; and 100% in all patients with Class C bone. Initial stability and durable fixation can be achieved with the use of this uncemented stem in patients in whom a cemented stem traditionally has been preferred as a result of poor bone quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19727996      PMCID: PMC2806973          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1035-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Minimum ten-year follow-up of a straight-stemmed, plasma-sprayed, titanium-alloy, uncemented femoral component in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  John B Meding; E Michael Keating; Merrill A Ritter; Philip M Faris; Michael E Berend
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Durability of the cemented femoral stem in patients 60 to 80 years old.

Authors:  Vijay J Rasquinha; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years.

Authors:  J C Clohisy; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur.

Authors:  L D Dorr; M C Faugere; A M Mackel; T A Gruen; B Bognar; H H Malluche
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Short-stemmed uncemented femoral component for primary hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Morrey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long-term study of the Taperloc stem.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Kjell S Keisu; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Use of a hydroxyapatite-coated stem in patients with Dorr Type C femoral bone.

Authors:  Stephen J Kelly; Claire E Robbins; Benjamin E Bierbaum; James V Bono; Daniel M Ward
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementless double-tapered total hip arthroplasty in patients 75 years of age and older.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory; Kathie L Dodds; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  [What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].

Authors:  S Gravius; T Randau; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Surgical treatment options in patients with impaired bone quality.

Authors:  Norman A Johanson; Jody Litrenta; Jay M Zampini; Frederic Kleinbart; Haviva M Goldman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nikolaj Winther; Claus Jensen; Morten Petersen; Thomas Lind; Henrik Schrøder; Michael Petersen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion.

Authors:  Katie Spain; Timothy Holt
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-19

5.  Twenty-year followup of an uncemented stem in primary THA.

Authors:  John B Meding; Merrill A Ritter; E Michael Keating; Michael E Berend
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty using S-ROM prosthesis in elder patients with type C and B bone.

Authors:  Zhong-Shou Zhao; Jun-Ying Sun
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-05-16

7.  Stable fixation of short-stem femoral implants in patients 70 years and older.

Authors:  Ronak M Patel; Matthew C Smith; Chase C Woodward; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [Juvenile rheumatoid diseases: Endoprosthetic care of destroyed hip joints].

Authors:  S Rehart; M Henniger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.

Authors:  David W Polly; John Swofford; Peter G Whang; Clay J Frank; John A Glaser; Robert P Limoni; Daniel J Cher; Kathryn D Wine; Jonathan N Sembrano
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.