PURPOSE: The study purpose was to prospectively determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver using same-day biopsy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine potential living liver donors underwent unenhanced and portal-phase contrast-enhanced hepatic CT and subsequent liver biopsy on the same day. Attenuation difference between the liver and the spleen on unenhanced (( pre ) L-S) and contrast-enhanced (( post ) L-S) images and blood-subtracted hepatic attenuation on contrast-enhanced images (( post ) L-B), calculated by [L - 0.3 x (0.75 x P + 0.25 x A)]/0.7 where L, P and A represent the attenuation of the liver, main portal vein and abdominal aorta, respectively, were obtained. The accuracy of these indices in diagnosing fatty liver according to various threshold levels, 5%-30% histological steatosis in increments of 5%, was compared using ROC analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for ( pre ) L-S, ( post ) L-S and ( post ) L-B was 0.663-0.918, 0.712-0.847 and 0.821-0.923, respectively, depending on the threshold levels of hepatic steatosis. The accuracy of ( pre ) L-S and ( post ) L-S did not differ (P >or= 0.054), despite a trend towards a lower accuracy with ( post ) L-S. ( post ) L-B yielded higher accuracy than ( pre ) L-S at threshold levels of 5% and 10% (P <or= 0.002) and similar accuracy to ( pre ) L-S at the other threshold levels (P >or= 0.144). CONCLUSION: Portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT has a similar, or even greater, accuracy than unenhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver.
PURPOSE: The study purpose was to prospectively determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver using same-day biopsy as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine potential living liver donors underwent unenhanced and portal-phase contrast-enhanced hepatic CT and subsequent liver biopsy on the same day. Attenuation difference between the liver and the spleen on unenhanced (( pre ) L-S) and contrast-enhanced (( post ) L-S) images and blood-subtracted hepatic attenuation on contrast-enhanced images (( post ) L-B), calculated by [L - 0.3 x (0.75 x P + 0.25 x A)]/0.7 where L, P and A represent the attenuation of the liver, main portal vein and abdominal aorta, respectively, were obtained. The accuracy of these indices in diagnosing fatty liver according to various threshold levels, 5%-30% histological steatosis in increments of 5%, was compared using ROC analysis. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve for ( pre ) L-S, ( post ) L-S and ( post ) L-B was 0.663-0.918, 0.712-0.847 and 0.821-0.923, respectively, depending on the threshold levels of hepatic steatosis. The accuracy of ( pre ) L-S and ( post ) L-S did not differ (P >or= 0.054), despite a trend towards a lower accuracy with ( post ) L-S. ( post ) L-B yielded higher accuracy than ( pre ) L-S at threshold levels of 5% and 10% (P <or= 0.002) and similar accuracy to ( pre ) L-S at the other threshold levels (P >or= 0.144). CONCLUSION: Portal-phase contrast-enhanced CT has a similar, or even greater, accuracy than unenhanced CT in diagnosing fatty liver.
Authors: Sang Won Lee; Seong Ho Park; Kyoung Won Kim; Eugene K Choi; Yong Moon Shin; Pyo Nyun Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Eun Sil Yu; Shin Hwang; Sung-Gyu Lee Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: David A Kooby; Yuman Fong; Arief Suriawinata; Mithat Gonen; Peter J Allen; David S Klimstra; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael D'Angelica; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Seong Ho Park; Luke Hahn; Sung-Gyu Lee; Kyongtae T Bae; Eun Sil Yu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-12-04 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Yingzhen N Zhang; Kathryn J Fowler; Gavin Hamilton; Jennifer Y Cui; Ethan Z Sy; Michelle Balanay; Jonathan C Hooker; Nikolaus Szeverenyi; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Alberto A Perez; Meghan G Lubner; Daniel C Elton; Ronald M Summers Journal: Radiographics Date: 2021 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.333