INTRODUCTION: Impulsivity is a central feature of drug addiction and may arise as a result of impaired inhibitory control. The extent to which inhibitory deficits arise as a consequence of drug exposure or relate to pre-existing addiction vulnerability is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared measures of impulsivity in outpatients with alcohol dependence (n = 23) and problem gambling (n = 21), a putative behavioural addiction where direct effects of drug exposure may be minimal. Healthy controls (n = 27) were also tested, in a cross-sectional design. Subjects completed the stop-signal test as a neurocognitive probe of response inhibition, alongside self-report ratings of impulsivity, adult ADHD and OCD. RESULTS: On the stop-signal test, Go reaction time and stop-signal reaction time were significantly slower in the alcohol-dependent group, compared with healthy controls. Healthy controls slowed their responding after successful and failed stop trials. Slowing after failed stop trials was significantly attenuated in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Go reaction time and post-error slowing were correlated with chronicity and severity, respectively, in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Problem gamblers did not differ significantly from controls on the stop-signal test, despite trait elevations in impulsivity ratings. CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control is impaired in alcohol dependence but occurs in the context of psychomotor slowing. In addition, alcohol-dependent individuals failed to show behavioral adjustment following failed stops. These deficits may represent direct effects of chronic alcohol administration on fronto-striatal circuitry.
INTRODUCTION: Impulsivity is a central feature of drug addiction and may arise as a result of impaired inhibitory control. The extent to which inhibitory deficits arise as a consequence of drug exposure or relate to pre-existing addiction vulnerability is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compared measures of impulsivity in outpatients with alcohol dependence (n = 23) and problem gambling (n = 21), a putative behavioural addiction where direct effects of drug exposure may be minimal. Healthy controls (n = 27) were also tested, in a cross-sectional design. Subjects completed the stop-signal test as a neurocognitive probe of response inhibition, alongside self-report ratings of impulsivity, adult ADHD and OCD. RESULTS: On the stop-signal test, Go reaction time and stop-signal reaction time were significantly slower in the alcohol-dependent group, compared with healthy controls. Healthy controls slowed their responding after successful and failed stop trials. Slowing after failed stop trials was significantly attenuated in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Go reaction time and post-error slowing were correlated with chronicity and severity, respectively, in the alcohol-dependent subjects. Problem gamblers did not differ significantly from controls on the stop-signal test, despite trait elevations in impulsivity ratings. CONCLUSION: Inhibitory control is impaired in alcohol dependence but occurs in the context of psychomotor slowing. In addition, alcohol-dependent individuals failed to show behavioral adjustment following failed stops. These deficits may represent direct effects of chronic alcohol administration on fronto-striatal circuitry.
Authors: Kelsie T Forbush; Martha Shaw; Margarita A Graeber; Lauren Hovick; Vanessa J Meyer; David J Moser; John Bayless; David Watson; Donald W Black Journal: CNS Spectr Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.790
Authors: R Rodriguez-Jimenez; C Avila; M A Jimenez-Arriero; G Ponce; R Monasor; M Jimenez; M Aragües; J Hoenicka; G Rubio; T Palomo Journal: J Gambl Stud Date: 2006-12
Authors: K Richard Ridderinkhof; Yolande de Vlugt; Aldo Bramlage; Marcus Spaan; Martin Elton; Jan Snel; Guido P H Band Journal: Science Date: 2002-11-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Martin Zack; Tracy M Woodford; Anne M Tremblay; Lindsay Steinberg; Laurie A Zawertailo; Usoa E Busto Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-03-24 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Maartje Luijten; Marise W J Machielsen; Dick J Veltman; Robert Hester; Lieuwe de Haan; Ingmar H A Franken Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.186
Authors: Jason M Sharbanee; Werner G K Stritzke; M Effin Jamalludin; Reinout W Wiers Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: L Joos; A E Goudriaan; L Schmaal; N A J De Witte; W Van den Brink; B G C Sabbe; G Dom Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 4.530