Literature DB >> 19725698

Increased microstructural variability is associated with decreased structural strength but with increased measures of structural ductility in human vertebrae.

Janardhan Yerramshetty1, Do-Gyoon Kim, Yener N Yeni.   

Abstract

The lack of accuracy in the prediction of vertebral fracture risk from average density measurements, all external factors being equal, may not just be because bone mineral density (BMD) is less than a perfect surrogate for bone strength but also because strength alone may not be sufficient to fully characterize the structural failure of a vertebra. Apart from bone quantity, the regional variation of cancellous architecture would have a role in governing the mechanical properties of vertebrae. In this study, we estimated various microstructural parameters of the vertebral cancellous centrum based on stereological analysis. An earlier study indicated that within-vertebra variability, measured as the coefficient of variation (COV) of bone volume fraction (BV/TV) or as COV of finite element-estimated apparent modulus (E(FE)) correlated well with vertebral strength. Therefore, as an extension to our earlier study, we investigated (i) whether the relationships of vertebral strength found with COV of BV/TV and COV of E(FE) could be extended to the COV of other microstructural parameters and microcomputed tomography-estimated BMD and (ii) whether COV of microstructural parameters were associated with structural ductility measures. COV-based measures were more strongly associated with vertebral strength and ductility measures than average microstructural measures. Moreover, our results support a hypothesis that decreased microstructural variability, while associated with increased strength, may result in decreased structural toughness and ductility. The current findings suggest that variability-based measures could provide an improvement, as a supplement to clinical BMD, in screening for fracture risk through an improved prediction of bone strength and ductility. Further understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying microstructural variability may help develop new treatment strategies for improved structural ductility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19725698      PMCID: PMC3725960          DOI: 10.1115/1.3148473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  32 in total

1.  Bone stiffness predicts strength similarly for human vertebral cancellous bone in compression and for cortical bone in tension.

Authors:  D P Fyhrie; D Vashishth
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Altered tissue properties induce changes in cancellous bone architecture in aging and diseases.

Authors:  J C van der Linden; J S Day; J A N Verhaar; H Weinans
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The dependence between the strength and stiffness of cancellous and cortical bone tissue for tension and compression: extension of a unifying principle.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; X Neil Dong; David P Fyhrie; Clifford M Les
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.300

5.  Static and fatigue failure properties of thoracic and lumbar vertebral bodies and their relation to regional density.

Authors:  D A McCubbrey; D D Cody; E L Peterson; J L Kuhn; M J Flynn; S A Goldstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Prediction of vertebral body compressive fracture using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R J McBroom; W C Hayes; W T Edwards; R P Goldberg; A A White
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Mechanical property distributions in the cancellous bone of the human proximal femur.

Authors:  T D Brown; A B Ferguson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1980-06

8.  Correlations between vertebral regional bone mineral density (rBMD) and whole bone fracture load.

Authors:  D D Cody; S A Goldstein; M J Flynn; E B Brown
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Estimation of vertebral body strength by dual photon absorptiometry in elderly individuals: comparison between measurements of total vertebral and vertebral body bone mineral.

Authors:  G Ortoft; L Mosekilde; C Hasling; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent "error" loads.

Authors:  J Homminga; B Van-Rietbergen; E M Lochmüller; H Weinans; F Eckstein; R Huiskes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  8 in total

1.  The effect of intravertebral heterogeneity in microstructure on vertebral strength and failure patterns.

Authors:  A I Hussein; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Variability of trabecular microstructure is age-, gender-, race- and anatomic site-dependent and affects stiffness and stress distribution properties of human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Matthew J Zinno; Janardhan S Yerramshetty; Roger Zauel; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 3.  Biomechanics of vertebral fractures and the vertebral fracture cascade.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Heterogeneity of bone mineral density and fatigue failure of human vertebrae.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Laila M Poisson; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  The intravertebral distribution of bone density: correspondence to intervertebral disc health and implications for vertebral strength.

Authors:  A I Hussein; T M Jackman; S R Morgan; G D Barest; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Differences in Trabecular Microarchitecture and Simplified Boundary Conditions Limit the Accuracy of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Models of Vertebral Failure.

Authors:  Amira I Hussein; Daniel T Louzeiro; Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Heterogeneity and Spatial Distribution of Intravertebral Trabecular Bone Mineral Density in the Lumbar Spine Is Associated With Prevalent Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Alexander Adams; Douglas P Kiel; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Trabecular Architecture and Mechanical Heterogeneity Effects on Vertebral Body Strength.

Authors:  Joshua D Auger; Neilesh Frings; Yuanqiao Wu; Andre Gutierrez Marty; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 5.096

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.