Literature DB >> 19724217

Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam.

Kata Miháltz1, Illés Kovács, Agnes Takács, Zoltán Z Nagy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the alteration of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic and normal corneas with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera.
METHODS: Pentacam measurements were performed on 41 eyes of 24 patients with keratoconus and 70 eyes of 41 normal subjects. In each eye, keratometric values, central and minimal pachymetry, and anterior and posterior elevation were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the different parameters. Predictors of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation data were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed in the keratoconus group to quantify the validity of critical parameters for keratoconus.
RESULTS: All parameters were significantly different in the keratoconus group compared with the normal control group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed the best predictive accuracy for posterior and anterior elevation (area under the curve, 0.97 and 0.96) followed by minimal and central pachymetry (0.89 and 0.88). The optimal cutoff point for posterior elevation was 15.5 microm for the discrimination of keratoconus corneas from normal. Logistic regression analysis showed best fit to the data for the model completed with the height data of the Pentacam. Confirmatory factor analysis explained a 3-factor model satisfactorily showing minimal pachymetry (-0.99), anterior elevation (0.98), and keratometry (0.95) as the most representative clinical variables of the disease.
CONCLUSION: Posterior and anterior elevation, pachymetric, and keratometric parameters measured by the Pentacam camera can effectively discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas serving as a useful diagnostic tool for disease staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19724217     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819e34de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  44 in total

1.  Correlation of basic indicators with stages of keratoconus assessed by Pentacam tomography.

Authors:  Xian-Li Du; Min Chen; Li-Xin Xie
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Short-term corneal changes with gas-permeable contact lens wear in keratoconus subjects: a comparison of two fitting approaches.

Authors:  Miguel Romero-Jiménez; Jacinto Santodomingo-Rubido; Patricia Flores-Rodríguez; Jose-Manuel González-Méijome
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-09-04

3.  Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Ronald H Silverman; Raksha Urs; Arindam Roychoudhury; Timothy J Archer; Marine Gobbe; Dan Z Reinstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Keratometry with five different techniques: a study of device repeatability and inter-device agreement.

Authors:  Shiva Mehravaran; Soheila Asgari; Sara Bigdeli; Ashkan Shahnazi; Hassan Hashemi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  A statistical approach to classification of keratoconus.

Authors:  Murat Ucar; Hasan Basri Cakmak; Baha Sen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Correlation between visual function and refractive, topographic, pachymetric and aberrometric data in eyes with keratoconus.

Authors:  Neslihan Bayraktar Bilen; Ibrahim F Hepsen; Carlos G Arce
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Anterior pituitary, sex hormones, and keratoconus: Beyond traditional targets.

Authors:  Dimitrios Karamichos; Paulina Escandon; Brenda Vasini; Sarah E Nicholas; Lyly Van; Deanna H Dang; Rebecca L Cunningham; Kamran M Riaz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 19.704

Review 8.  A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuemin Zhang; Saleha Z Munir; Syed A Sami Karim; Wuqaas M Munir
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Evaluation of Intraocular Pressure and Other Biomechanical Parameters to Distinguish between Subclinical Keratoconus and Healthy Corneas.

Authors:  Cristina Peris-Martínez; María Amparo Díez-Ajenjo; María Carmen García-Domene; María Dolores Pinazo-Durán; María José Luque-Cobija; María Ángeles Del Buey-Sayas; Susana Ortí-Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Attenuation of lysyl oxidase and collagen gene expression in keratoconus patient corneal epithelium corresponds to disease severity.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Arunapriya Sathyanarayanamoorthy; Reshma Airody Ramachandra; Vishal Arora; Anuprita Ghosh; Purnima Raman Srivatsa; Natasha Pahuja; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Abhijit Sinha-Roy; Rajiv R Mohan; Arkasubhra Ghosh
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.