| Literature DB >> 19723340 |
Ting-Chun Weng1, Chien-Chang Shen, Yung-Tsung Chiu, Yun-Lian Lin, Cheng-Deng Kuo, Yi-Tsau Huang.
Abstract
Activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) plays a crucial role in liver fibrogenesis. armepavine (Arm, C19H23O3N), an active compound from Nelumbo nucifera, has been shown to exert immunosuppressive effects on T lymphocytes and on lupus nephritic mice. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Arm could exert anti-hepatic fibrogenic effects in vitro and in vivo. A cell line of rat HSCs (HSC-T6) was stimulated with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to evaluate the inhibitory effects of Arm. An in vivo therapeutic study was conducted in bile duct-ligated (BDL) rats. BDL rats were given Arm (3 or 10 mg/kg) by gavage twice daily for 3 weeks starting from the onset of BDL. Liver sections were taken for fibrosis scoring, immuno-fluorescence staining and quantitative real-time mRNA measurements. In vitro, Arm (1-10 microM) concentration-dependently attenuated TNF-alpha- and LPS-stimulated alpha-SMA protein expression and AP-1 activation by HSC-T6 cells without adverse cytotoxicity. Arm also suppressed TNF-alpha-induced collagen collagen deposition, NFkappaB activation and MAPK (p38, ERK1/2, and JNK) phosphorylations. In vivo, Arm treatment significantly reduced plasma AST and ALT levels, hepatic alpha-SMA expression and collagen contents, and fibrosis scores of BDL rats as compared with vehicle treatment. Moreover, Arm attenuated the mRNA expression levels of col 1alpha2, TGF-beta1, TIMP-1, ICAM-1, iNOS, and IL-6 genes, but up-regulated metallothionein genes. Our study results showed that Arm exerted both in vitro and in vivo antifibrotic effects in rats, possibly through anti-NF-kappaB activation pathways.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19723340 PMCID: PMC2741443 DOI: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-78
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomed Sci ISSN: 1021-7770 Impact factor: 8.410
Figure 1(a) Effects of armepavine on collagen deposition by HSC-T6 cells after TNF-α stimulation for 24 hrs. Collagen deposition by HSC-T6 cells was quantified by Sircol collagen assay (n = 3). *p < 0.05 for TNF-α alone vs. Control; #p < 0.05 for TNF-α + armepavine vs. TNF-α alone. (b) Armepavine reduced the protein expression of α-SMA induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 1 μg/ml) in HSC-T6 cells for 24 hrs. Representative results from three independent experiments are shown here, with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) as a positive control. *p < 0.05 for LPS alone vs. Control; #p < 0.05 for LPS + armepavine or NAC vs. LPS alone.
Figure 2(a) Effects of armepavine on TNF-α-induced IκBα phosphorylation in the cytoplasmic extract and translocation of NFκB in the nuclear extract of HSC-T6 cells for 6 hrs, with PCNA and α-tubulin as internal controls. (b) Effects of armepavine on TNF-α-induced NFκB transcriptional activity using luciferase reporter gene assay in HSC-T6 cells for 6 hrs, with . Representative results from three independent experiments are shown here *p < 0.05 for TNF-α alone vs. Control; #p < 0.05 for TNF-α + armepavine or NAC vs. TNF-α alone.
Figure 3(a) Effects of armepavine on TNF-α-induced ERK1/2, p38 and JNK 1/2 phosphorylation levels in HSC-T6 cells. HSC-T6 cells were treated with TNF-α for 0-120 minutes. Representative results from three independent experiments are shown here. #p < 0.05 for phosphorylation of JNK 1/2 induced by TNF-α + armepavine vs. TNF-α alone at the same time point; †p < 0.05 for phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 induced by TNF-α + armepavine vs. TNF-α alone at the same time point; *p < 0.05 for phosphorylation of p38 induced by TNF-α + armepavine vs. TNF-α alone at the same time point. (b) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis for the expressions of . Representative results from three independent experiments are shown here, with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) as a positive control. *p < 0.05 for TNF-α alone vs. Control; #p < 0.05 for TNF-α + (S)-armepavine or NAC vs. TNF-α alone.
General profiles in sham-operated (SO) and bile-duct-ligated (BDL) rats receiving armepavine (Arm), silymarin (sil) or vehicle (0.7% CMC) treatment.
| BW (g) | 386 ± 22 | 302 ± 21* | 335 ± 17.8*,# | 333 ± 16.1*,# | 345 ± 22.0*,# |
| LW (g) | 19.5 ± 0.8 | 29.2 ± 0.4* | 27.4 ± 0.1*,# | 27.5 ± 1.1*,# | 26.3 ± 0.3*,# |
| ALT (U/L) | 76 ± 5.0 | 756 ± 19* | 545 ± 10*,# | 536 ± 4 *,# | 434 ± 11*,# |
| AST (U/L) | 43 ± 2 | 168 ± 21* | 128 ± 8*,# | 127 ± 10*,# | 73 ± 9*,## |
| Collagen | 3.42 ± 0.59 | 6.63 ± 0.31* | 5.36 ± 0.12*,# | 6.18 ± 0.16* | 4.38 ± 0.33*,# |
| α-SMA/α-tubulin ratio (%) | 100 ± 1 | 182 ± 8* | 150 ± 3*,# | 173 ± 8* | 141 ± 12*,# |
| Fibrosis score | 0 ± 0 | 2.42 ± 0.20* | 1.42 ± 0.20*,# | 1.85 ± 0.14*,# | 1.28 ± 0.18*,## |
| Necrosis score | 0 ± 0 | 1.17 ± 0.31** | 0.29 ± 0.18*,## | 0.38 ± 0.18*,# | 0.50 ± 0.22*,# |
Note: BDL, bile-duct ligated; BW, body weight; LW, liver weight; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate transaminase; collagen content (mg/g liver dry mass); protein expression of -SMA (expressed as -SMA/-tubulin ratio) in the cytoplasmic extract of liver tissues in Western blot analysis, with sham-operated group set as 100%; fibrosis and necrosis scores. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of rats in each group is 6. *p < 0.05 vs. sham operated group; **p < 0.01 vs. sham operated group; #p < 0.05 vs. BDL group; ##p < 0.01 vs. BDL group.
Figure 4Histological examination of liver sections in control and bile-duct-ligated (BDL) rats. Representative liver sections were obtained from sham-operated rats (a), BDL rats receiving vehicle (b), BDL rats receiving 50 mg/kg silymarin (c), BDL rats receiving 3-mg/kg armepavine (d), and BDL rats receiving 10-mg/kg armepavine (e). Sections were stained with Sirius red. Scale bar = 200 m.
Quantitative real-time PCR analysis for the mRNA expressions in sham-operated (SO) and bile-duct-ligated (BDL) rats receiving armepavine (Arm), silymarin (sil) or vehicle (0.7% CMC) treatment
| 1.00 ± 0.44 | 12.5 ± 0.2* | 7.31 ± 0.11*,# | 7.45 ± 0.08*,# | 5.09 ± 0.23*,# | |
| 1.00 ± 0.81 | 21.5 ± 0.2* | 13.1 ± 0.9*,# | 14.5 ± 0.8*,# | 7.09 ± 1.72*,# | |
| 1.01 ± 0.84 | 28.0 ± 2.6* | 4.93 ± 1.88*,# | 4.36 ± 1.70*,# | 3.87 ± 1.59*,# | |
| 1.00 ± 0.20 | 22.5 ± 0.5* | 12.2 ± 0.1*,# | 15.5 ± 0.2*,# | 7.03 ± 0.35*,# | |
| 1.00 ± 0.08 | 7.53 ± 0.17* | 5.31 ± 0.09*,# | 6.45 ± 0.08*,# | 3.09 ± 0.31*,# | |
| 1.00 ± 0.10 | 31.5 ± 0.3* | 11.3 ± 0.1*,# | 10.5 ± 0.1*,# | 4.09 ± 0.17*,# | |
| 1.00 ± 0.10 | 0.34 ± 0.06* | 0.56 ± 0.08*,# | 0.37 ± 0.10* | 0.57 ± 0.05*,# |
Note: Quantitative real-time PCR analysis for the expressions of procollagen I (col 12), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), intercellular adhension molecule-I (ICAM-1), iNOS, interleukin (IL)-6 and metallothionein genes in sham-operated rats and BDL rats receiving saline, Arm (3 and 10 mg/kg) or silymarin (50 mg/kg). Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. The number of rats in each group is 6. *p < 0.05 vs. sham operated group; #p < 0.05 vs. BDL group.