Literature DB >> 19720918

Prospective study of determinants and outcomes of deferred treatment or watchful waiting among men with prostate cancer in a nationwide cohort.

William V Shappley1, Stacey A Kenfield, Julie L Kasperzyk, Weiliang Qiu, Meir J Stampfer, Martin G Sanda, June M Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine consequences of deferred treatment (DT) as initial management of prostate cancer (PCa) in a contemporary, prospective cohort of American men diagnosed with PCa. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We evaluated deferred treatment for PCa in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, a prospective study of 51,529 men. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for time to eventual treatment among men who deferred treatment for more than 1 year after diagnosis. HRs for time to metastasis or death as a result of PCa were compared between patients who deferred treatment and those who underwent immediate treatment within 1 year of diagnosis.
RESULTS: From among 3,331 cohort participants diagnosed with PCa from 1986 to 2007, 342 (10.3%) initially deferred treatment. Of these, 174 (51%) remained untreated throughout follow-up (mean 7.7 years); the remainder were treated an average of 3.9 years after diagnosis. Factors associated with progression to treatment among DT patients included younger age, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason score, and higher prostate-specific antigen at diagnosis. We observed similar rates for development of metastases (n = 20 and n = 199; 7.2 v 8.1 per 1,000 person-years; P = .68) and death as a result of PCa (n = 8 and n = 80; 2.4 v 2.6 per 1,000 person-years; P = .99) for DT and immediate treatment, respectively.
CONCLUSION: In this nationwide cohort, more than half the men who opted for DT remained without treatment for 7.7 years after diagnosis. Older men and men with lesser cancer severity at diagnosis were more likely to remain untreated. PCa mortality did not differ between DT and active treatment patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19720918      PMCID: PMC2799054          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  21 in total

1.  High grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma between the ages of 20-69: an autopsy study of 249 cases.

Authors:  W A Sakr; D J Grignon; J D Crissman; L K Heilbrun; B J Cassin; J J Pontes; G P Haas
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Patterns of treatment of patients with prostate cancer initially managed with surveillance: results from The CaPSURE database. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor.

Authors:  T M Koppie; G D Grossfeld; D Miller; J Yu; D Stier; J M Broering; D Lubeck; J M Henning; S C Flanders; P R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas Scherr; Peter W Swindle; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Health outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: results from the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Study.

Authors:  A L Potosky; J Legler; P C Albertsen; J L Stanford; F D Gilliland; A S Hamilton; J W Eley; R A Stephenson; L C Harlan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Conservative management of prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era: the incidence and time course of subsequent therapy.

Authors:  A L Zietman; H Thakral; L Wilson; P Schellhammer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Expectant management of nonpalpable prostate cancer with curative intent: preliminary results.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Patrick C Walsh; Patricia Landis; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Results of conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  G W Chodak; R A Thisted; G S Gerber; J E Johansson; J Adolfsson; G W Jones; G D Chisholm; B Moskovitz; P M Livne; J Warner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-01-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Delayed therapy with curative intent in a contemporary prostate cancer watchful-waiting cohort.

Authors:  M el-Geneidy; M Garzotto; I Panagiotou; Y C Hsieh; M Mori; L Peters; T Klein; T M Beer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  An analysis of men with clinically localized prostate cancer who deferred definitive therapy.

Authors:  Manish I Patel; Dino T DeConcini; Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makato Ohori; Thomas Wheeler; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  P C Albertsen; D G Fryback; B E Storer; T F Kolon; J Fine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Management of low (favourable)-risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Watchful waiting and quality of life among prostate cancer survivors in the Physicians' Health Study.

Authors:  Julie L Kasperzyk; William V Shappley; Stacey A Kenfield; Lorelei A Mucci; Tobias Kurth; Jing Ma; Meir J Stampfer; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of clinicopathologic variables and biomarkers for risk stratification.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Sophie M Bruinsma; Joseph Nicholson; Alberto Briganti; Tom Pickles; Yoshiyuki Kakehi; Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Gleason score 6 adenocarcinoma: should it be labeled as cancer?

Authors:  H Ballentine Carter; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; Bruce J Trock; Robert W Veltri; William G Nelson; Donald S Coffey; Eric A Singer; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer: when is active surveillance appropriate?

Authors:  Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  [PREFERE--open questions].

Authors:  C Schäfer; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Decision Support and Shared Decision Making About Active Surveillance Versus Active Treatment Among Men Diagnosed with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Ronald E Myers; Amy E Leader; Jean Hoffman Censits; Edouard J Trabulsi; Scott W Keith; Anett M Petrich; Anna M Quinn; Robert B Den; Mark D Hurwitz; Costas D Lallas; Sarah E Hegarty; Adam P Dicker; Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Veda N Giri; Hasan Ayaz; Leonard G Gomella
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Quality of life among men with low-risk prostate cancer during the first year following diagnosis: the PREPARE prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Richard M Hoffman; Kimberly M Davis; Tania Lobo; Yingjun Zhou; Amethyst Leimpeter; Jun Shan; Roxanne E Jensen; David S Aaronson; Stephen K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Benchmarks for operative outcomes of robotic and open radical prostatectomy: results from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Martin Sanda; Derek Yecies; Lorelei A Mucci; Meir J Stampfer; Stacey A Kenfield
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Sociodemographic and Clinical Predictors of Switching to Active Treatment among a Large, Ethnically Diverse Cohort of Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer on Observational Management.

Authors:  Scott P Kelly; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Richard M Hoffman; David S Aaronson; Tania Lobo; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpter; Jun Shan; Arnold L Potosky; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.