Literature DB >> 11586206

Conservative management of prostate cancer in the prostate specific antigen era: the incidence and time course of subsequent therapy.

A L Zietman1, H Thakral, L Wilson, P Schellhammer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The long natural history of early stage prostate cancer is well recognized and a conservative approach to the treatment of elderly men is often encouraged. We assessed the ability of patients and physicians to adhere to a policy of watchful waiting in the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all 199 men with stages T1-2 prostate cancer and PSA less than 20 ng./ml. who in our practice elected watchful waiting. Median followup in the population overall was 3.4 years. We performed Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis of overall and disease specific survival, and most pertinent survival free from therapy. A questionnaire was administered to record the attitude of patients who ultimately proceeded to treatment to determine how therapy was triggered.
RESULTS: Median patient age was 71 years and median PSA was 6.6 ng./ml. The tumor was impalpable in 52% of patients, Gleason sum was 6 or less in 80% and 11% used some form of herbal remedy or nutritional supplementation. Of the 37 men who died during observation, including 35 of co-morbid illness, only 6 underwent treatment. Overall survival at 5 and 7 years was 77% and 63% but disease specific survival was 98% and 98%, respectively. A total of 64 patients underwent treatment and actuarial freedom from treatment was 56% at 5 years, including 51% and 73% in those younger and older than 75 years at diagnosis. The likelihood of being alive and free from treatment was 43% at 5 years and 26% at 7. Of the 63 men treated 48 (76%) underwent radical therapy (brachytherapy in 17, external beam radiotherapy in 29 and prostatectomy in 2), while only 24% received androgen deprivation. The median PSA increase from diagnosis to treatment in treated patients was 2.9 ng./ml., and it was 0.9 ng./ml. from diagnosis to the last followup in those not treated. Of the treated patients 81% believed that the physician had initiated therapy due to a PSA increase or a nodule. However, physicians recorded having advocated treatment in only 24% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: When patients do not die of co-morbid illness, they are likely to proceed to therapy well within the first decade after diagnosis (57% by 5 years and 74% by 7). Therapy was usually definitive (radical) and triggered by slight, inevitable PSA increases. The patient perception was that the physicians initiated therapy in response to increasing PSA. However, the physicians more often perceived that treatment was initiated by patients. Therefore, watchful waiting in the PSA era often represents radical therapy delayed by a few years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11586206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  Selective detection of histologically aggressive prostate cancer: an Early Detection Research Network Prediction model to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies with validation in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Simpa Salami; Meredith M Regan; Donna P Ankerst; John T Wei; Mark A Rubin; Ian M Thompson; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Quality of life in men undergoing active surveillance for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Bergman; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-12

3.  Watchful waiting for localized prostate cancer in the PSA era: what have been the triggers for intervention?

Authors:  John J Coen; Adam S Feldman; Matthew R Smith; Anthony L Zietman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  [Active surveillance for prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Graefen; S Ahyai; R Heuer; G Salomon; T Schlomm; H Isbarn; L Budäus; H Heinzer; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Prospective study of determinants and outcomes of deferred treatment or watchful waiting among men with prostate cancer in a nationwide cohort.

Authors:  William V Shappley; Stacey A Kenfield; Julie L Kasperzyk; Weiliang Qiu; Meir J Stampfer; Martin G Sanda; June M Chan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Continuing controversy over monitoring men with localized prostate cancer: a systematic review of programs in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; David Gunnell; Freddie Hamdy; David Neal; Athene Lane; Jenny Donovan
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Screening for prostate cancer: the debate continues.

Authors:  Marc R Matrana; Bradley Atkinson
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2013-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.