Literature DB >> 19717599

Facilitated oligomerization of mycobacterial GroEL: evidence for phosphorylation-mediated oligomerization.

C M Santosh Kumar1, Garima Khare, C V Srikanth, Anil K Tyagi, Abhijit A Sardesai, Shekhar C Mande.   

Abstract

The distinctive feature of the GroES-GroEL chaperonin system in mediating protein folding lies in its ability to exist in a tetradecameric state, form a central cavity, and encapsulate the substrate via the GroES lid. However, recombinant GroELs of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are unable to act as effective molecular chaperones when expressed in Escherichia coli. We demonstrate here that the inability of M. tuberculosis GroEL1 to act as a functional chaperone in E. coli can be alleviated by facilitated oligomerization. The results of directed evolution involving random DNA shuffling of the genes encoding M. tuberculosis GroEL homologues followed by selection for functional entities suggested that the loss of chaperoning ability of the recombinant mycobacterial GroEL1 and GroEL2 in E. coli might be due to their inability to form canonical tetradecamers. This was confirmed by the results of domain-swapping experiments that generated M. tuberculosis-E. coli chimeras bearing mutually exchanged equatorial domains, which revealed that E. coli GroEL loses its chaperonin activity due to alteration of its oligomerization capabilities and vice versa for M. tuberculosis GroEL1. Furthermore, studying the oligomerization status of native GroEL1 from cell lysates of M. tuberculosis revealed that it exists in multiple oligomeric forms, including single-ring and double-ring variants. Immunochemical and mass spectrometric studies of the native M. tuberculosis GroEL1 revealed that the tetradecameric form is phosphorylated on serine-393, while the heptameric form is not, indicating that the switch between the single- and double-ring variants is mediated by phosphorylation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19717599      PMCID: PMC2795288          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00652-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  62 in total

1.  On the maximum size of proteins to stay and fold in the cavity of GroEL underneath GroES.

Authors:  C Sakikawa; H Taguchi; Y Makino; M Yoshida
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1999-07-23       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  The lower hydrolysis of ATP by the stress protein GroEL is a major factor responsible for the diminished chaperonin activity at low temperature.

Authors:  J A Mendoza; P Dulin; T Warren
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Assembly of chaperonin complexes.

Authors:  A R Kusmierczyk; J Martin
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.695

4.  Assay of chaperonin-assisted refolding of citrate synthase.

Authors:  N K Steede; S L Temkin; S J Landry
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

5.  GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding requires an intact central cavity.

Authors:  J D Wang; M D Michelitsch; J S Weissman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Splicing by overlap extension by PCR using asymmetric amplification: an improved technique for the generation of hybrid proteins of immunological interest.

Authors:  A N Warrens; M D Jones; R I Lechler
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1997-02-20       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES.

Authors:  J S Weissman; C M Hohl; O Kovalenko; Y Kashi; S Chen; K Braig; H R Saibil; W A Fenton; A L Horwich
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The groES and groEL heat shock gene products of Escherichia coli are essential for bacterial growth at all temperatures.

Authors:  O Fayet; T Ziegelhoffer; C Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding.

Authors:  M J Todd; P V Viitanen; G H Lorimer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  One member of a gro-ESL-like chaperonin multigene family in Bradyrhizobium japonicum is co-regulated with symbiotic nitrogen fixation genes.

Authors:  H M Fischer; M Babst; T Kaspar; G Acuña; F Arigoni; H Hennecke
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  20 in total

1.  Structural and functional conservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL paralogs suggests that GroEL1 Is a chaperonin.

Authors:  Bernhard Sielaff; Ki Seog Lee; Francis T F Tsai
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Distinct features of protein folding by the GroEL system from a psychrophilic bacterium, Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H.

Authors:  Seiji Yamauchi; Yuya Ueda; Mika Matsumoto; Umihiko Inoue; Hidenori Hayashi
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Phosphoproteomic analysis of the Chlamydia caviae elementary body and reticulate body forms.

Authors:  Derek J Fisher; Nancy E Adams; Anthony T Maurelli
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 4.  Bacterial virulence in the moonlight: multitasking bacterial moonlighting proteins are virulence determinants in infectious disease.

Authors:  Brian Henderson; Andrew Martin
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Comparison of the moonlighting actions of the two highly homologous chaperonin 60 proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Ana Cehovin; Anthony R M Coates; Yanmin Hu; Yanira Riffo-Vasquez; Peter Tormay; Catherine Botanch; Frederic Altare; Brian Henderson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 6.  Multiple chaperonins in bacteria--novel functions and non-canonical behaviors.

Authors:  C M Santosh Kumar; Shekhar C Mande; Gaurang Mahajan
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Allosteric differences dictate GroEL complementation of E. coli.

Authors:  Jared Sivinski; Duc Ngo; Christopher J Zerio; Andrew J Ambrose; Edmond R Watson; Lynn K Kaneko; Marius M Kostelic; Mckayla Stevens; Anne-Marie Ray; Yangshin Park; Chunxiang Wu; Michael T Marty; Quyen Q Hoang; Donna D Zhang; Gabriel C Lander; Steven M Johnson; Eli Chapman
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Human resistin, a proinflammatory cytokine, shows chaperone-like activity.

Authors:  Madhuri Suragani; Varma D Aadinarayana; Aleem Basha Pinjari; Karunakar Tanneeru; Lalitha Guruprasad; Sharmistha Banerjee; Saurabh Pandey; Tapan K Chaudhuri; Nasreen Zafar Ehtesham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  GroEL2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Reveals the Importance of Structural Pliability in Chaperonin Function.

Authors:  Neeraja Chilukoti; C M Santosh Kumar; Shekhar C Mande
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Mechanisms involved in the functional divergence of duplicated GroEL chaperonins in Myxococcus xanthus DK1622.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Wen-yan Zhang; Zheng Zhang; Jian Li; Zhi-feng Li; Zai-gao Tan; Tian-tian Zhang; Zhi-hong Wu; Hong Liu; Yue-zhong Li
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.