Literature DB >> 19716940

Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate versus risedronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.

Mickaël Hiligsmann1, Olivier Bruyère, Jean-Yves Reginster.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated Markov microsimulation model with a Belgian payer's perspective estimated the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a 3-year strontium ranelate treatment compared with no treatment and with the bisphosphonate risedronate. Data on the effect of both treatments on fracture risk were taken from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Analyses were performed for postmenopausal women aged 75 and 80 years, either with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (i.e. bone mineral density T-score <or=-2.5 SD) or with prevalent vertebral fractures (PVF). Parameter uncertainty was evaluated using both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS: Strontium ranelate was dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) versus risedronate for women with osteoporosis aged over 75 years and for women with PVF aged 80 years. The cost per QALY gained of strontium ranelate compared with risedronate at 75 years of age was euro 11,435 for women with PVF. When compared with no treatment, the costs per QALY gained of strontium ranelate were euro 15,588 and euro 7,708 at 75 and 80 years of age for women with osteoporosis; the equivalent values were euro 16,518 and euro 6,015 for women with PVF. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that strontium ranelate was generally more cost-effective than risedronate, in the range of 60% in all cases.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that strontium ranelate is a cost-effective strategy, in a Belgian setting, for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged over 75 years. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19716940     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.08.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

1.  Strontium Ranelate: Long-Term Efficacy against Vertebral, Nonvertebral and Hip Fractures in Patients with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Reginster; Mickaël Hiligsmann; Olivier Bruyere
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 2.  Strontium ranelate: a review of its use in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks; Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A systematic review of models used in cost-effectiveness analyses of preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  L Si; T M Winzenberg; A J Palmer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Silvia M Evers; Wafa Ben Sedrine; John A Kanis; Bram Ramaekers; Jean-Yves Reginster; Stuart Silverman; Caroline E Wyers; Annelies Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost effectiveness of denosumab compared with oral bisphosphonates in the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporotic women in Belgium.

Authors:  Mickaël Hiligsmann; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Strontium substitution for calcium in lithogenesis.

Authors:  Sarah D Blaschko; Thomas Chi; Joe Miller; Lawrence Flechner; Sirine Fakra; Pankaj Kapahi; Arnold Kahn; Marshall L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  The position of strontium ranelate in today's management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J-Y Reginster; M-L Brandi; J Cannata-Andía; C Cooper; B Cortet; J-M Feron; H Genant; S Palacios; J D Ringe; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal.

Authors:  Md Azharuddin; Mohammad Adil; Rashid Ali Khan; Pinaki Ghosh; Prem Kapur; Manju Sharma
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 9.  Health technology assessment in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Mickael Hiligsmann; John A Kanis; Juliet Compston; Cyrus Cooper; Bruno Flamion; Pierre Bergmann; Jean-Jacques Body; Steven Boonen; Olivier Bruyere; Jean-Pierre Devogelaer; Stefan Goemaere; Jean-Marc Kaufman; Serge Rozenberg; Jean-Yves Reginster
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the treatment of male osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Hiligsmann; W Ben Sedrine; O Bruyère; J-Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.