| Literature DB >> 19715579 |
Evelina Mocci1, Maria P Concas, Manuela Fanciulli, Nicola Pirastu, Mauro Adamo, Valentina Cabras, Cristina Fraumene, Ivana Persico, Alessandro Sassu, Andrea Picciau, Dionigio A Prodi, Donatella Serra, Ginevra Biino, Mario Pirastu, Andrea Angius.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A multiplicity of study designs such as gene candidate analysis, genome wide search (GWS) and, recently, whole genome association studies have been employed for the identification of the genetic components of essential hypertension (EH). Several genome-wide linkage studies of EH and blood pressure-related phenotypes demonstrate that there is no single locus with a major effect while several genomic regions likely to contain EH-susceptibility loci were validated by multiple studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19715579 PMCID: PMC2741446 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-10-81
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Genet ISSN: 1471-2350 Impact factor: 2.103
Figure 1The entire pedigree with 2,246 members, including 99 hypertensive patients, from the Talana population. Men are represented with squares and women with circles. Affected individuals are represented in black. To simplify, unaffected relatives of the patients included in the analyses are not shown. This pedigree was drawn using Pedfiddler v. 0.5.
Figure 2Distribution of genome-wide maximum simulated LOD scores in each of 1,000 replicate using the STRs markers.
Clinical characteristics of the studied population.
| Males | 92.81 ± 8.12 | 146.60 ± 13.50 | 56.92 ± 17.50 | 163.25 ± 5.26 | 78.20 ± 8.07 | 29.38 ± 3.06 | 196.50 ± 38.53 | 55.10 ± 9.84 | 116.52 ± 31.48 | 124.40 ± 37.58 | 69.23% |
| Females | 88.91 ± 10.17 | 151.38 ± 15.22 | 58.38 ± 13.05 | 150.13 ± 5.16 | 63.83 ± 9.80 | 28.34 ± 4.17 | 206.42 ± 29.74 | 60.5 ± 13.55 | 122.71 ± 29.29 | 116.02 ± 49.06 | 59.52% |
| 90.38 ± 9.58 | 149.59 ± 14.68 | 57.86 ± 14.73 | 155.05 ± 8.22 | 69.22 ± 11.51 | 28.73 ± 3.80 | 203.00 ± 33.045 | 58.63 ± 12.57 | 120.57 ± 29.93 | 118.91 ± 45.27 | 63.23% | |
| Males | 80.56 ± 9.14 | 137.97 ± 15.38 | 63.94 ± 17.28 | 160.76 ± 6.20 | 69.73 ± 11.47 | 26.92 ± 3.84 | 190.05 ± 45.89 | 46.94 ± 11.55 | 122.49 ± 39.31 | 103.11 ± 41.48 | - |
| Females | 80.45 ± 6.99 | 131.95 ± 15.64 | 56.35 ± 14.70 | 149.15 ± 5.48 | 57.70 ± 11.17 | 25.74 ± 4.95 | 203.79 ± 33.62 | 64.55 ± 14.31 | 120.13 ± 31.72 | 95.51 ± 38.59 | - |
| 80.51 ± 8.05 | 134.91 ± 15.68 | 60.03 ± 16.30 | 154.49 ± 8.21 | 63.24 ± 12.34 | 26.33 ± 4.99 | 199.90 ± 37.61 | 59.56 ± 15.68 | 120.80 ± 33.71 | 97.66 ± 39.23 | - | |
| 79.87 ± 13.07 | 131.28 ± 21.01 | 51.87 ± 18.52 | 155.78 ± 9.56 | 65.60 ± 14.46 | 26.95 ± 5.03 | 194.31 ± 34.45 | 58.39 ± 12.67 | 114.53 ± 29.81 | 106.92 ± 58.51 | - | |
All columns contain Mean values and Standard Deviations for each variable.
§DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; §S SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; # Age, Age at examination; ## BMI, Body Mass Index; * Tot Chol, Total Cholesterol, ** Treatment, % taking antihypertensive medications for at least one year; *** Analyzed subjects >18 years.
Summary of results in both genome wide scans using 902 autosomal microsatellites and 16.300 biallelic markers.
| D1S468 | 3.6–9.5 | |||||
| D2S2981 | 155.7–180.8 | rs9287822 | 157.08–167.62 | |||
| D3S2432 | 27.9–49.4 | rs10490772 | 43.07–54.91 | 1.45 | ||
| D6S1006 | 12.96–14.06 | |||||
| D6S1017 | 41.7–50.7 | rs4715134 | 48.77–50.04 | 1.12 | ||
| D6S462 | 90.98 | |||||
| D8S560 | 17.9–21.6 | |||||
| D10S597 | 111.2–119.1 | |||||
| D11S1998 | 114.7–123.1 | rs7949154 | 112.8–126.6 | |||
| D12S374 | 3.5–13.5 | |||||
| D13S1807 | 41.5–54.0 | rs7333137 | 44.9–70.4 | |||
| D14S742 | 19.9–21.7 | |||||
| D15S131 | 64.3–72 | |||||
| D17S2195 | 70.2–73.4 | |||||
| D18S970 | 33.1–51.5 | |||||
| D19S586 | 8–12.5 | |||||
| D19S418 | 58.4–62.3 | rs11672983 | 58.89–61.11 | 1.6 | ||
Significant values are in boldface with asterisk (*), suggestive in boldface.
Figure 3Multipoint LOD scores for all autosomal chromosomes. Each panel shows the chromosome number with the length in megabases (Mb) in abscissa and the LOD scores in ordinate (microsatellites-dotted line; SNPs-solid line).
Figure 4Multipoint LOD scores for each chromosome that showed the most significant results. Each panel shows the chromosome number with the length in megabases (Mb) in abscissa and the LOD scores in ordinate (microsatellites-dotted line; SNPs-solid line).