Literature DB >> 19713069

The landscape of distress in the terminally ill.

Harvey Max Chochinov1, Thomas Hassard, Susan McClement, Thomas Hack, Linda J Kristjanson, Mike Harlos, Shane Sinclair, Alison Murray.   

Abstract

Understanding the complexities of distress and knowing who is most vulnerable is foundational to the provision of quality, palliative end-of-life care. Although prior studies have examined the prevalence of symptom distress among patients nearing death, these studies have tended to largely focus on physical and, to a lesser extent, psychological challenges. The aim of this study was to use the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI), a novel, reliable, and validated measure of end-of-life distress, to describe a broad landscape of distress in patients who are terminally ill. The PDI, a 25-item self-report, was administered to 253 patients receiving palliative care. Each PDI item is rated by patients to indicate the degree to which they experience various kinds of end-of-life distress. Palliative care patients reported an average of 5.74 problems (standard deviation, 5.49; range, 0-24), including physical, psychological, existential, and spiritual challenges. Being an inpatient, being educated, and having a partner were associated with certain kinds of end-of-life problems, particularly existential distress. Spirituality, especially its existential or "sense of meaning and purpose" dimension, was associated with less distress for terminally ill patients. A better appreciation for the nature of distress is a critical step toward a fuller understanding of the challenges facing the terminally ill. A clear articulation of the landscape of distress, including insight regarding those who are most at risk, should pave the way toward more effective, dignity-conserving end-of-life care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19713069     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  26 in total

Review 1.  Respecting the spiritual side of advanced cancer care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Katherine M Piderman; Simon Kung; Sarah M Jenkins; Terin T Euerle; Timothy J Yoder; Gracia M Kwete; Maria I Lapid
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Suffering and euthanasia: a qualitative study of dying cancer patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Marit Karlsson; Anna Milberg; Peter Strang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  A Mindfulness-Based Intervention as a Supportive Care Strategy for Patients with Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Spouses: Results of a Three-Arm Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cohen; Eduardo Bruera; Kathrin Milbury; Yisheng Li; Sania Durrani; Zhongxing Liao; Anne S Tsao; Cindy Carmack
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-08-17

4.  Patient Dignity Question: Feasible, dignity-conserving intervention in a rural hospice.

Authors:  Pamela McDermott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Impact of death and dying on the personal lives and practices of palliative and hospice care professionals.

Authors:  Shane Sinclair
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Social Inequalities in Palliative Care for Cancer Patients in the United States: A Structured Review.

Authors:  Ronit Elk; Tisha M Felder; Ebru Cayir; Cleo A Samuel
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.315

7.  Detrimental social interactions predict loss of dignity among patients with cancer.

Authors:  R Philipp; A Mehnert; C Lehmann; K Oechsle; C Bokemeyer; A Krüll; S Vehling
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  A Comprehensive Approach to the Patient at End of Life: Assessment of Multidimensional Suffering.

Authors:  Amy B Wachholtz; Christina E Fitch; Suzana Makowski; Jennifer Tjia
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Can senior volunteers deliver reminiscence and creative activity interventions? Results of the legacy intervention family enactment randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca S Allen; Grant M Harris; Louis D Burgio; Casey B Azuero; Leslie A Miller; Hae Jung Shin; Morgan K Eichorst; Ellen L Csikai; Jamie DeCoster; Linda L Dunn; Elizabeth Kvale; Patricia Parmelee
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Existential Quality of Life and Associated Factors in Cancer Patients Receiving Palliative Care.

Authors:  Petra Rantanen; Harvey Max Chochinov; Linda L Emanuel; George Handzo; Diana J Wilkie; Yingwei Yao; George Fitchett
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.