Literature DB >> 19711087

Response of the hammerhead shark olfactory epithelium to amino acid stimuli.

Timothy C Tricas1, Stephen M Kajiura, Adam P Summers.   

Abstract

Sharks and rays are highly sensitive to chemical stimuli in their natural environment but several hypotheses predict that hammerhead sharks, with their expanded head and enlarged olfactory epithelium, have particularly acute olfactory systems. We used the electro-olfactogram (EOG) technique to compare the relative response of the scalloped hammerhead shark (Sphyrna lewini) olfactory epithelium to 20 proteinogenic amino acids and determine the sensitivity for 6 amino acids. At micromolar concentrations, cysteine evoked the greatest EOG response which was approximately twice as large as that of alanine. The weakest response was obtained for proline followed by aspartic acid and isoleucine. The olfactory epithelium showed adaptation to sequential stimulation, and recovery was related to the inter-stimulus time period. Estimated EOG response thresholds were in the sub-nanomolar range for both alanine (9.2 x 10(-11) M) and cysteine (8.4 x 10(-10) M) and in the micromolar range for proline and serine. These thresholds from 10(-10) to 10(-6) M for the scalloped hammerhead shark are comparable or lower than those reported for other teleost and elasmobranch species. Future work should focus on binary and more complex compounds to test for competition and cross-adaptation for different classes of peripheral receptors, and their responses to molecules found in biologically relevant stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19711087     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-009-0470-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  4 in total

1.  ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAMS OF SHARKS.

Authors:  P W GILBERT; E S HODGSON; R F MATHEWSON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Olfactory morphology of carcharhinid and sphyrnid sharks: does the cephalofoil confer a sensory advantage?

Authors:  Stephen M Kajiura; Jesica B Forni; Adam P Summers
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.804

3.  The underwater electro-olfactogram: a tool for the study of the sense of smell of marine fishes.

Authors:  W L Silver; J Caprio; J F Blackwell; D Tucker
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1976-09-15

4.  Klinotaxis and rheotaxis in orientation of sharks toward chemical stimuli.

Authors:  R F Mathewson; E S Hodgson
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1972-05-01
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Signaling by sensory receptors.

Authors:  David Julius; Jeremy Nathans
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 10.005

2.  Olfactory sensitivity to amino acids in the blackspot sea bream (Pagellus bogaraveo): a comparison between olfactory receptor recording techniques in seawater.

Authors:  Peter C Hubbard; Eduardo N Barata; Rodrigo O A Ozório; Luisa M P Valente; Adelino V M Canário
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  The Chemical Sensitivity and Electrical Activity of Individual Olfactory Sensory Neurons to a Range of Sex Pheromones and Food Odors in the Goldfish.

Authors:  Koji Sato; Peter W Sorensen
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Microstructure of the Bonnethead Shark (Sphyrna tiburo) Olfactory Rosette.

Authors:  Lauren E Simonitis; Christopher D Marshall
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Molecular dynamics simulations of water/mucus partition coefficients for feeding stimulants in fish and the implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Alex D Rygg; Adri C T van Duin; Brent A Craven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Deepwater Horizon Crude Oil Water Accommodated Fraction on Olfactory Function in the Atlantic Stingray, Hypanus sabinus.

Authors:  Eloise J Cave; Stephen M Kajiura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.